Sandefur Benjamin J, Shappell Eric F, Campbell Ronna L, Brown Calvin A, Driver Brian E, Carlson Jestin N, Mullan Aidan F, Park Yoon Soo, Tekian Ara
Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester Minnesota USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mass General Brigham Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2024 May 16;8(3):e10992. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10992. eCollection 2024 Jun.
This needs assessment aimed to improve understanding of flexible endoscopic intubation training and practice in emergency medicine (EM), providing insights to educators and practice leaders seeking to improve education and practices.
We conducted a multicenter, mixed-methods needs assessment of emergency physicians (EPs) incorporating focus groups and a survey. Focus groups comprised community EPs, academic EPs, and resident EPs. We analyzed focus group transcripts using grounded theory, qualitatively describing EM endoscopic intubation. The qualitative analysis shaped our survey instrument, which we deployed in cross-sectional fashion. We report survey data with descriptive statistics.
Focus groups with 13 EPs identified three themes: indications for use of endoscopic intubation, factors impacting a physician's decision to endoscopically intubate, and attaining and maintaining endoscopic intubation competency. Of 257 surveyed EPs (33% response rate), 79% had received endoscopic intubation training during residency, though 82% had performed this procedure 10 or fewer times in their career. Despite 97% acknowledging the necessity of competency, only 23% felt highly confident in their ability to perform endoscopic intubation. Participants (93%) reported scarce opportunities to perform the procedure and identified factors believed to facilitate competency acquisition and maintenance, including opportunities to perform endoscopic intubation in practice (98%), local champions (93%), and performing nasopharyngoscopy (87%).
While most EPs acknowledged the importance of competency in endoscopic intubation, they reported scarce procedural opportunities and commonly expressed low confidence. Further research is needed on this topic, and we propose avenues to enhance education and practices related to endoscopic intubation. These include development of robust procedural curricula, support of local champions, and incorporating nasopharyngoscopy into EM practice.
本次需求评估旨在增进对急诊医学(EM)中柔性内镜插管培训与实践的理解,为寻求改进教育与实践的教育工作者和实践领导者提供见解。
我们对急诊医师(EP)进行了一项多中心、混合方法的需求评估,包括焦点小组讨论和一项调查。焦点小组由社区急诊医师、学术急诊医师和住院医师组成。我们运用扎根理论分析焦点小组讨论记录,对急诊医学内镜插管进行定性描述。定性分析形成了我们的调查问卷,我们以横断面方式进行调查。我们用描述性统计报告调查数据。
与13名急诊医师进行的焦点小组讨论确定了三个主题:内镜插管的使用指征、影响医师决定进行内镜插管的因素以及获得并维持内镜插管能力。在257名接受调查的急诊医师中(回复率为33%),79%在住院期间接受过内镜插管培训,不过82%在其职业生涯中执行该操作的次数为10次或更少。尽管97%的人承认能力的必要性,但只有23%的人对自己进行内镜插管的能力非常有信心。参与者(93%)报告称进行该操作的机会很少,并确定了被认为有助于获得和维持能力的因素,包括在实践中进行内镜插管的机会(98%)、当地的支持者(93%)以及进行鼻咽镜检查(87%)。
虽然大多数急诊医师承认内镜插管能力的重要性,但他们报告称操作机会很少,并且普遍信心不足。需要对这一主题进行进一步研究,我们提出了加强与内镜插管相关的教育和实践的途径。这些途径包括制定完善的操作课程、支持当地的支持者以及将鼻咽镜检查纳入急诊医学实践。