Simon Laura, Terhorst Yannik, Cohrdes Caroline, Pryss Rüdiger, Steinmetz Lisa, Elhai Jon D, Baumeister Harald
Institute of Psychology and Education, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, Ulm, Germany.
Mental Health Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute Berlin, Nordufer 20, Berlin, Germany.
Sleep Med X. 2024 May 4;7:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.sleepx.2024.100114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Digital phenotyping can be an innovative and unobtrusive way to improve the detection of insomnia. This study explores the correlations between smartphone usage features (SUF) and insomnia symptoms and their predictive value for detecting insomnia symptoms.
In an observational study of a German convenience sample, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and smartphone usage data (e.g., time the screen was active, longest time the screen was inactive in the night) for the previous 7 days were obtained. SUF (e.g., min, mean) were calculated from the smartphone usage data. Correlation analyses between the ISI and SUF were conducted. For the specification of the machine learning models (ML), 80 % of the data was allocated to training, 20 % to testing, and five-fold cross-validation was used. Six algorithms (support vector machine, XGBoost, Random Forest, k-Nearest-Neighbor, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regressions) were specified to predict ISI scores ≥15.
752 participants (51.1 % female, mean ISI = 10.23, mean age = 41.92) were included in the analyses. Small correlations between some of the SUF and insomnia symptoms were found. In the ML models, sensitivity was low, ranging from 0.05 to 0.27 in the testing subsample. Random Forest and Naive Bayes were the best-performing algorithms. Yet, their AUCs (0.57, 0.58 respectively) in the testing subsample indicated a low discrimination capacity.
Given the small magnitude of the correlations and low discrimination capacity of the ML models, SUFs, as measured in this study, do not appear to be sufficient for detecting insomnia symptoms. Further research is necessary to explore whether examining intra-individual variations and subpopulations or employing alternative smartphone sensors yields more promising outcomes.
数字表型分析可能是一种创新且不引人注意的改善失眠检测的方法。本研究探讨了智能手机使用特征(SUF)与失眠症状之间的相关性及其对检测失眠症状的预测价值。
在一项对德国便利样本的观察性研究中,获取了过去7天的失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和智能手机使用数据(例如屏幕活跃时间、夜间屏幕最长不活跃时间)。从智能手机使用数据中计算出SUF(例如最小值、平均值)。对ISI和SUF进行了相关性分析。为了确定机器学习模型(ML),将80%的数据分配用于训练,20%用于测试,并使用了五折交叉验证。指定了六种算法(支持向量机、XGBoost、随机森林、k近邻、朴素贝叶斯和逻辑回归)来预测ISI评分≥15。
752名参与者(51.1%为女性,平均ISI = 10.23,平均年龄 = 41.92)纳入分析。发现一些SUF与失眠症状之间存在小的相关性。在ML模型中,测试子样本中的敏感性较低,范围为0.05至0.27。随机森林和朴素贝叶斯是表现最佳的算法。然而,它们在测试子样本中的AUC(分别为0.57、0.58)表明区分能力较低。
鉴于相关性较小且ML模型的区分能力较低,本研究中测量的SUF似乎不足以检测失眠症状。有必要进一步研究,以探索检查个体内部变化和亚人群或采用替代智能手机传感器是否会产生更有前景的结果。