需要紧急医疗服务响应的室内外伤害性跌倒的临床创伤严重程度。
Clinical Trauma Severity of Indoor and Outdoor Injurious Falls Requiring Emergency Medical Service Response.
作者信息
Burford Kathryn G, Itzkowitz Nicole G, Crowe Remle P, Wang Henry E, Lo Alexander X, Rundle Andrew G
机构信息
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.
ESO Solutions LLC.
出版信息
Res Sq. 2024 May 7:rs.3.rs-4202941. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4202941/v1.
BACKGROUND
Injurious falls represent a significant public health burden. Research and polices have primarily focused on falls occurring indoors despite evidence that outdoor falls account for 47-58% of all falls requiring some medical attention. This study compared the clinical trauma severity of indoor versus outdoor injurious falls requiring Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response.
METHODS
Using the 2019 National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) dataset, we identified the location of patients injured from falls that required EMS response. We classified injury severity using 1) the Revised Trauma Score for Triage (T-RTS): ≤ 11 indicated the need for transport to a Trauma Center; 2) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): ≤8 and 9-12 indicated moderate and severe neurologic injury; and 3) patient clinical acuity by EMS: Dead, Critical, Emergent, Low.
RESULTS
Of 1,854,909 encounters for patients with injurious falls, the vast majority occurred indoors (=1,596,860) compared to outdoors (=152,994). The proportions of patients with moderate or severe GCS scores, were comparable between those with indoor falls (3.0%) and with outdoor falls on streets or sidewalks (3.8%), T-RTS scores indicating need for transport to a Trauma Center (5.2% vs 5.9%) and EMS acuity rated as Emergent or Critical (27.7% vs 27.1%).Injurious falls were more severe among male patients compared to females: and males injured by falling on streets or sidewalks had higher percentages for moderate or severe GCS scores (4.8% vs 3.6%) and T-RTS scores indicating the need for transport to a Trauma Center (7.3% vs 6.5%) compared to indoor falls. Young and middle-aged patients whose injurious falls occurred on streets or sidewalks were more likely to have a T-RTS score indicating the need for Trauma Center care compared to indoor falls among this subgroup. Yet older patients injured by falling indoors were more likely to have a T-RTS score indicating the need for Trauma Center than older patients who fell on streets or sidewalks.
CONCLUSIONS
There was a similar proportion of patients with severe injurious falls that occurred indoors and on streets or sidewalks. These findings suggest the need to determine outdoor environmental risks for outdoor falls to support location-specific interventions.
背景
伤害性跌倒给公共卫生带来了沉重负担。尽管有证据表明,需要医疗救治的所有跌倒事件中,47%-58%发生在户外,但研究和政策主要集中在室内发生的跌倒事件上。本研究比较了需要紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应的室内与室外伤害性跌倒的临床创伤严重程度。
方法
利用2019年国家紧急医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS)数据集,我们确定了需要EMS响应的跌倒受伤患者的位置。我们使用以下方法对损伤严重程度进行分类:1)分诊修订创伤评分(T-RTS):≤11表示需要转运至创伤中心;2)格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS):≤8以及9-12分别表示中度和重度神经损伤;3)EMS评估的患者临床急症程度:死亡、危急、紧急、轻症。
结果
在1854909例伤害性跌倒患者中,绝大多数发生在室内(=1596860例),而室外为(=152994例)。中度或重度GCS评分患者的比例,在室内跌倒患者(3.0%)与街道或人行道上的室外跌倒患者(3.8%)之间相当,T-RTS评分表明需要转运至创伤中心的比例(5.2%对5.9%)以及EMS急症程度评为紧急或危急的比例(27.7%对27.1%)。与女性相比,男性的伤害性跌倒更严重:在街道或人行道上跌倒受伤的男性,中度或重度GCS评分(4.8%对3.6%)以及T-RTS评分表明需要转运至创伤中心的比例(7.3%对6.5%)高于室内跌倒的男性。与该亚组中的室内跌倒相比,在街道或人行道上发生伤害性跌倒的中青年患者更有可能有T-RTS评分表明需要创伤中心治疗。然而,与在街道或人行道上跌倒的老年患者相比,在室内跌倒受伤的老年患者更有可能有T-RTS评分表明需要创伤中心治疗。
结论
在室内以及街道或人行道上发生的严重伤害性跌倒患者比例相似。这些发现表明,有必要确定户外跌倒的户外环境风险,以支持针对特定地点的干预措施。