Suppr超能文献

对新型冠状病毒肺炎机械通气患者持续输注氯胺酮

Continuous Infusion of Ketamine in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with SARS-CoV-2.

作者信息

Phan Brian, Agyemang Afua, Klein Walter, Thapamagar Suman B

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Res Pract. 2024 May 10;2024:7765932. doi: 10.1155/2024/7765932. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Widespread drug shortages led to higher utilization of ketamine in our intensive care unit, especially among patients with SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of continuous infusion of ketamine on vasopressor requirements in patients with SARS-CoV-2.

METHOD

This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study comparing mechanically ventilated (MV), adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 receiving either propofol or ketamine for at least 72 hours.

RESULTS

84 patients (mean age of 61-year-old, 68% male) were analyzed. 31 patients received ketamine, and 53 patients received propofol. Mean vasopressor doses were not significantly different between ketamine and propofol groups at prespecified timepoints. However, mean arterial pressures (MAP) were higher in the ketamine group at 24 h, 48 h, and 96 h postsedative initiation. The median opioid infusion requirements were 3 vs. 12.5 mg/hr ( < 0.0001) for ketamine and propofol groups, respectively. Comparing to propofol, C-reactive protein (CRP) values were significantly lower in the ketamine group at 24 h (7.53 vs. 15.9 mg/dL, =0.03), 48 h (5.23 vs. 14.1 mg/dL, =0.0083), and 72 h (6.4 vs. 12.1 mg/dL, =0.0085).

CONCLUSION

In patients with SARS-CoV-2 on MV, there was no difference in the vasopressor requirement in patients receiving ketamine compared to propofol. Nevertheless, the use of ketamine was associated with higher MAP, reductions in CRP in select timepoints, and overall lower opioid requirements.

摘要

背景

广泛的药物短缺导致我们重症监护病房中氯胺酮的使用增加,尤其是在感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的患者中。

目的

评估持续输注氯胺酮对SARS-CoV-2患者血管活性药物需求的影响。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,比较接受丙泊酚或氯胺酮治疗至少72小时的机械通气成年SARS-CoV-2患者。

结果

分析了84例患者(平均年龄61岁,68%为男性)。31例患者接受氯胺酮治疗,53例患者接受丙泊酚治疗。在预定时间点,氯胺酮组和丙泊酚组的平均血管活性药物剂量无显著差异。然而,在镇静开始后24小时、48小时和96小时,氯胺酮组的平均动脉压(MAP)较高。氯胺酮组和丙泊酚组的阿片类药物输注需求中位数分别为3 vs. 12.5mg/小时(<0.0001)。与丙泊酚相比,氯胺酮组在24小时(7.53 vs. 15.9mg/dL,P=0.03)、48小时(5.23 vs. 14.1mg/dL,P=0.0083)和72小时(6.4 vs. 12.1mg/dL,P=0.0085)时C反应蛋白(CRP)值显著较低。

结论

在接受机械通气的SARS-CoV-2患者中,与丙泊酚相比,接受氯胺酮治疗的患者血管活性药物需求无差异。然而,氯胺酮的使用与较高的MAP、特定时间点CRP的降低以及总体较低的阿片类药物需求相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5e3/11101250/bdc5b3528180/CCRP2024-7765932.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验