Department of Oncology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China.
J Tradit Chin Med. 2024 Jun;44(3):581-585. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20240402.005.
To assess the efficacy and safety of Neiguan (PC6) acupoint acustimulation in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), especially for patients with guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) due to personal reasons METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2021, 373 patients suffered from solid malignancy were recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Complete response (no emesis and no rescue medication use) rate during the overall phase (0-120 h of each chemo-cycle) was the primary assessment of CINV control. The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire was investigated among these patients as a secondary 'quality of life' objective to assess the impact of CINV on patients' daily life by recording score of nausea and vomiting.
With acustimulation of Neiguan (PC6) acupuncture point through a portable, noninvasive and user-friendly device, in terms of complete response rate and scores in nausea/vomiting by FLIE questionnaire, patients achieve a better outcome in highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) induced CINV, especially GICP subgroup. Meanwhile, analysis also demonstrated this tendency existed in other patients with HEC/GCCP (guideline consistent CINV prophylaxis) and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy, although the difference was not significant.
Considering advantages of Neiguan (PC6) acustimulation such as noninvasive, covered by medical insurance and few side effects, we believe it would be an ideal auxiliary tool in CINV control, especially in patients who receive highly emetogenic chemo-protocol and are reluctant to GCCP for economic reasons.
评估内关(PC6)穴位电刺激预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的疗效和安全性,特别是对于因个人原因而不符合指南的 CINV 预防(GICP)的患者。
2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,根据纳入标准共招募了 373 名患有实体恶性肿瘤的患者。整个阶段(每个化疗周期的 0-120 小时)的完全缓解(无呕吐且无解救药物使用)率是 CINV 控制的主要评估指标。功能性生活指数-呕吐(FLIE)问卷用于评估这些患者的“生活质量”,通过记录恶心和呕吐的评分,评估 CINV 对患者日常生活的影响。
使用便携式、非侵入性且易于使用的设备对内关(PC6)穴位进行电刺激,在完全缓解率和 FLIE 问卷中恶心/呕吐评分方面,患者在高致吐性化疗(HEC)引起的 CINV 中取得了更好的效果,尤其是 GICP 亚组。同时,分析还表明,在其他接受 HEC/GCCP(指南一致的 CINV 预防)和中度致吐性化疗的患者中也存在这种趋势,尽管差异不显著。
考虑到内关(PC6)电刺激的优势,如非侵入性、医疗保险覆盖和很少有副作用,我们认为它将是 CINV 控制的理想辅助工具,特别是对于接受高致吐性化疗方案且因经济原因不愿意接受 GCCP 的患者。