Suppr超能文献

手术学员和外科医生对 283 段腹腔镜胆囊切除术视频中关键安全视野的手术质量评估。

Surgical quality assessment of critical view of safety in 283 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos by surgical residents and surgeons.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3609-3614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10873-0. Epub 2024 May 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical quality assessment has improved the efficacy and efficiency of surgical training and has the potential to optimize the surgical learning curve. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the critical view of safety (CVS) can be assessed with a 6-point competency assessment tool (CAT), a task commonly performed by experienced surgeons. The aim of this study is to determine the capability of surgical residents to perform this assessment.

METHODS

Both surgeons and surgical residents assessed unedited LC videos using a 6-point CVS, a CAT, using an online video assessment platform. The CAT consists of the following three criteria: 1. clearance of hepatocystic triangle, 2. cystic plate, and 3. two structures connect to the gallbladder, with a maximum of 2 points available for each criterion. A higher score indicates superior surgical performance. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the inter-rater reliability between surgeons and surgical residents.

RESULTS

In total, 283 LC videos were assessed by 19 surgeons and 31 surgical residents. The overall ICC for all criteria was 0.628. Specifically, the ICC scores were 0.504 for criterion 1, 0.639 for criterion 2, and 0.719 for the criterion involving the two structures connected to the gallbladder. Consequently, only the criterion regarding clearance of the hepatocystic triangle exhibited fair agreement, whereas the other two criteria, as well as the overall scores, demonstrated good agreement. In 71% of cases, both surgeons and surgical residents scored a total score either ranging from 0 to 4 or from 5 to 6.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the gold standard, i.e., the surgeons' assessments, surgical residents are equally skilled at assessing critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos. By incorporating video-based assessments of surgical procedures into their training, residents could potentially enhance their learning pace, which may result in better clinical outcomes.

摘要

简介

手术质量评估提高了手术培训的效果和效率,并有潜力优化手术学习曲线。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中,可以使用 6 点能力评估工具(CAT)评估关键安全视图(CVS),这是一项经验丰富的外科医生通常执行的任务。本研究旨在确定外科住院医师执行此评估的能力。

方法

外科医生和外科住院医师均使用在线视频评估平台,使用 6 点 CVS 和 CAT 评估未经编辑的 LC 视频。CAT 由以下三个标准组成:1. 肝胆囊三角间隙清晰,2. 胆囊板,3. 两个结构连接到胆囊,每个标准最多可获得 2 分。得分越高表示手术表现越好。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估外科医生和外科住院医师之间的评分者间可靠性。

结果

共 19 名外科医生和 31 名外科住院医师评估了 283 个 LC 视频。所有标准的总体 ICC 为 0.628。具体而言,标准 1 的 ICC 评分为 0.504,标准 2 的 ICC 评分为 0.639,涉及与胆囊相连的两个结构的标准 ICC 评分为 0.719。因此,仅清除肝胆囊三角的标准显示出公平的一致性,而其他两个标准以及总体评分则显示出良好的一致性。在 71%的情况下,外科医生和外科住院医师对总评分的评估结果均为 0 至 4 分或 5 至 6 分。

结论

与金标准(即外科医生的评估)相比,外科住院医师在评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)视频中的关键安全视图(CVS)方面同样熟练。通过将手术程序的视频评估纳入其培训中,住院医师可以提高学习速度,从而可能带来更好的临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbf/11219398/83af41c8205a/464_2024_10873_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验