• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析英国生育诊所网站上关于延时成像信息指南的依从情况。

Analysing adherence to guidelines for time-lapse imaging information on UK fertility clinic websites.

机构信息

Department of People and Organisation, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Department of Social Sciences and Economics, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Hum Fertil (Camb). 2024 Dec;27(1):2346595. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2346595. Epub 2024 May 20.

DOI:10.1080/14647273.2024.2346595
PMID:38769878
Abstract

This study aims to systematically analyze the provision of information on Time-lapse Imaging (TLI) by UK fertility clinic websites. We conducted an analysis of 106 clinic websites that offer fertility treatment to self-funded patients. The analysis aimed to examine whether these clinics offer TLI, the associated cost for patients, and the clarity and quality of the provided information. Out of the 106 websites analysed, 71 (67%) claimed to offer TLI. Among these websites, 25 (35.2%) mentioned charging patients between £300 and £850, 25 (35.8%) claimed not to charge patients, and 21 (29.6%) did not provide any cost information for TLI. Furthermore, 64 (90.1%) websites made claims or implied that TLI leads to improved clinical outcomes by enhancing embryo selection. Notably, 34 (47.9%) websites did not mention or provide any links to the HFEA rating system. It is crucial to provide patients with clear and accurate information to enable them to make fully informed decisions about TLI, particularly when they are responsible for the associated costs. The findings of this study raise concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information available on fertility clinic websites, which are typically the primary source of information for patients.

摘要

本研究旨在系统分析英国生育诊所网站提供的延时成像(TLI)信息。我们对 106 家向自费患者提供生育治疗的诊所网站进行了分析。该分析旨在检查这些诊所是否提供 TLI、患者的相关费用,以及提供信息的清晰度和质量。在分析的 106 个网站中,有 71 个(67%)声称提供 TLI。在这些网站中,有 25 个(35.2%)提到向患者收取 300 英镑至 850 英镑之间的费用,有 25 个(35.8%)声称不向患者收取费用,有 21 个(29.6%)没有提供 TLI 的任何费用信息。此外,有 64 个(90.1%)网站声称或暗示 TLI 通过增强胚胎选择来改善临床结果。值得注意的是,有 34 个(47.9%)网站没有提到或提供任何与 HFEA 评级系统相关的链接。向患者提供清晰准确的信息至关重要,以使他们能够充分了解 TLI 的情况,特别是当他们需要承担相关费用时。本研究的结果引发了对生育诊所网站上信息的可靠性和准确性的关注,这些网站通常是患者获取信息的主要来源。

相似文献

1
Analysing adherence to guidelines for time-lapse imaging information on UK fertility clinic websites.分析英国生育诊所网站上关于延时成像信息指南的依从情况。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2024 Dec;27(1):2346595. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2346595. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites.生育诊所网站上三种试管婴儿附加服务的流行程度、推广情况和定价。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Nov;41(5):801-806. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
"Add-Ons" for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Do Patients Get Honest Information from Fertility Clinics' Websites?辅助生殖技术的“附加服务”:患者能否从生育诊所的网站获得真实信息?
Reprod Sci. 2021 Dec;28(12):3466-3472. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00601-7. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Reporting assisted reproductive technology success rates on Australian and New Zealand fertility clinic websites.澳大利亚和新西兰生育诊所网站上辅助生殖技术成功率的报告
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;60(1):135-140. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13126.
5
Claims for fertility interventions: a systematic assessment of statements on UK fertility centre websites.生育干预的声明:对英国生育中心网站上声明的系统评估。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 27;6(11):e013940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013940.
6
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology advertising guidelines: How are member clinics doing?辅助生殖技术学会广告指南:会员诊所有何表现?
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics?社会辅助生殖技术协会成员生育诊所网站提供的社会卵子冷冻保存信息的质量如何?
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
8
Low E-visibility of embryologists on fertility clinic websites: a web-based cross-sectional study.胚胎学家在生育诊所网站上的低可见度:一项基于网络的横断面研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Nov;40(11):2619-2626. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02938-1. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
9
Infertility information on the World Wide Web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK.万维网上的不孕不育信息:英国互联网上不孕不育信息质量的横断面调查。
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jul;23(7):1520-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den072. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
10
The quality of information about elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) on Australian fertility clinic websites.澳大利亚生育诊所网站中关于选择性卵母细胞冷冻保存(EOC)信息的质量。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;60(4):605-609. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13174. Epub 2020 Jul 9.