• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已故供体肾分配中的巨细胞病毒匹配:来自美国国家模拟模型的结果

Cytomegalovirus Matching in Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: Results From a U.S. National Simulation Model.

作者信息

Sandikçi Burhaneddin, Ulukuş M Yasin, Ergün Mehmet Ali, Tanriöver Bekir

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Division of Nephrology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

出版信息

Transplant Direct. 2024 May 17;10(6):e1622. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001622. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001622
PMID:38769987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11104729/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects >60% of adults and can pose an independent risk factor for allograft loss and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a nationwide implementation of CMV seromatching (donor/recipient: D-/R- and D+/R+) in the U.S. deceased donor kidney allocation system (KAS).

METHODS

Adult candidates on the U.S. kidney-only transplant waiting list and deceased donor kidneys offered to the U.S. transplant centers were considered. A discrete-event simulation model, simulating the pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2018, was used to compare the performances of currently employed KAS-250 policy (without CMV matching) to various simulated CMV matching policies parameterized by calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold. Outcomes included CMV serodistribution, waiting time, access to transplantation among various groups, transplant rate, graft survival, kidney discard rate, and antigen-mismatch distribution, stratified by CMV serostatus.

RESULTS

CMV matching policy with a calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold of 50% (namely, the policy) strikes a better balance between benefits and drawbacks of CMV matching. Compared with KAS-250, reduced CMV high-risk (D+/R-) transplants (6.1% versus 18.1%) and increased CMV low-risk (D-/R-) transplants (27.2% versus 13.1%); increased transplant rate for CMV R- patients (11.54 versus 12.57) but decreased for R+ patients (10.68 versus 10.48), yielding an increase in aggregate (11.09 versus 10.94); and reduced mean time to transplantation (by 6 wk); and reduced kidney discard rate (25.7% versus 26.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the feasibility and potential advantages of a nationwide CMV seromatching policy in kidney transplantation.

摘要

背景

巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染了超过60%的成年人,并且可能成为实体器官移植受者移植器官丧失和死亡的独立危险因素。本研究的目的是评估在美国已故供体肾脏分配系统(KAS)中全国范围内实施CMV血清学匹配(供体/受体:D-/R-和D+/R+)的影响。

方法

考虑了美国仅肾脏移植等待名单上的成年候选者以及提供给美国移植中心的已故供体肾脏。使用离散事件模拟模型,模拟2015年1月1日至2018年1月1日的COVID-19大流行前时期,以比较当前采用的KAS-250政策(无CMV匹配)与由计算得出的群体反应性抗体例外阈值参数化的各种模拟CMV匹配政策的性能。结果包括CMV血清分布、等待时间、不同群体之间的移植机会、移植率、移植物存活率、肾脏丢弃率以及抗原错配分布,按CMV血清状态分层。

结果

计算得出的群体反应性抗体例外阈值为50%的CMV匹配政策(即 政策)在CMV匹配的利弊之间取得了更好的平衡。与KAS-250相比, 减少了CMV高风险(D+/R-)移植(6.1%对18.1%),增加了CMV低风险(D-/R-)移植(27.2%对13.1%);增加了CMV R-患者的移植率(11.54对12.57),但R+患者的移植率降低(10.68对10.48),总体移植率增加(11.09对10.94);并缩短了平均移植时间(缩短6周);以及降低了肾脏丢弃率(25.7%对26.2%)。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了在肾脏移植中全国范围内实施CMV血清学匹配政策的可行性和潜在优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/cdcd712ab9b5/txd-10-e1622-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/84fa56c972d3/txd-10-e1622-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/3dca7902a64e/txd-10-e1622-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/08b9ff566c0d/txd-10-e1622-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/cdcd712ab9b5/txd-10-e1622-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/84fa56c972d3/txd-10-e1622-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/3dca7902a64e/txd-10-e1622-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/08b9ff566c0d/txd-10-e1622-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/11104729/cdcd712ab9b5/txd-10-e1622-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cytomegalovirus Matching in Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: Results From a U.S. National Simulation Model.已故供体肾分配中的巨细胞病毒匹配:来自美国国家模拟模型的结果
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 17;10(6):e1622. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001622. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Cytomegalovirus mismatch still negatively affects patient and graft survival in the era of routine prophylactic and preemptive therapy: A paired kidney analysis.巨细胞病毒错配仍会影响常规预防和抢先治疗时代的患者和移植物存活率:配对肾脏分析。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):573-584. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15183. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
3
Cytomegalovirus serologic matching in deceased donor kidney allocation optimizes high- and low-risk (D+R- and D-R-) profiles and does not adversely affect transplant rates.巨细胞病毒血清学匹配在供体肾分配中优化了高危和低危(D+R-和 D-R-)人群,且不会对移植率产生不利影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Dec;20(12):3502-3508. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15976. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
CMV mismatch does not affect patient and graft survival in UK renal transplant recipients.巨细胞病毒错配不影响英国肾移植受者的患者及移植物存活率。
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 15;88(1):77-82. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181aa8d36.
5
Impact of Cytomegalovirus Serostatus on Allograft Loss and Mortality Within the First Year After Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of the National Transplant Registry.巨细胞病毒血清学状态对肾移植术后第一年同种异体移植肾丢失和死亡率的影响:一项国家移植登记分析
Transplant Proc. 2020 Apr;52(3):829-835. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Cytomegalovirus serostatus pairing and deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes in adult recipients with antiviral prophylaxis.巨细胞病毒血清学状态配对和抗病毒预防的成年受者中死亡供体肾移植结局。
Transplantation. 2010 Nov 27;90(10):1091-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f7c053.
7
High risk of cytomegalovirus infection following solid organ transplantation despite prophylactic therapy.尽管进行了预防性治疗,实体器官移植后仍存在巨细胞病毒感染的高风险。
J Med Virol. 2013 May;85(5):893-8. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23539.
8
Impact of donor and recipient cytomegalovirus serology on long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.供体和受体巨细胞病毒血清学对心脏移植受者长期生存的影响。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;21(1):e13015. doi: 10.1111/tid.13015. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Impact of donor and recipient cytomegalovirus serology on long-term survival of lung transplant recipients.供体和受体巨细胞病毒血清学对肺移植受者长期生存的影响。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;20(5):e12964. doi: 10.1111/tid.12964. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
10
Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients.不同地方的移植中心在等待移植的患者中进行肾移植的概率存在较大差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2900-2911. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020030335. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Letermovir vs Valganciclovir for Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.来特莫韦与缬更昔洛韦预防高危肾移植受者巨细胞病毒感染:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 3;330(1):33-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9106.
2
A systematic literature review of the global seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: possible implications for treatment, screening, and vaccine development.一项关于巨细胞病毒全球血清流行率的系统文献回顾:对治疗、筛查和疫苗开发的可能影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;22(1):1659. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13971-7.
3
Real-World Treatment Patterns of Antiviral Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus Among Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Linked USRDS-Medicare Database Study.
真实世界中成年肾移植受者巨细胞病毒抗病毒预防治疗的模式:一项基于 USRDS-Medicare 数据库的研究。
Transpl Int. 2022 Aug 12;35:10528. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10528. eCollection 2022.
4
Cytomegalovirus Donor Seropositivity Negatively Affects Survival After Heart Transplantation.巨细胞病毒供体血清学阳性对心脏移植后的生存产生负面影响。
Transplantation. 2022 Jun 1;106(6):1243-1252. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003961. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
The Clinical and Economic Benefit of CMV Matching in Kidney Transplant: A Decision Analysis.肾移植中巨细胞病毒配型的临床及经济效益:一项决策分析
Transplantation. 2022 Jun 1;106(6):1227-1232. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003887. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
Cytomegalovirus transmission in mismatched solid organ transplant recipients: Are factors other than anti-viral prophylaxis at play?巨细胞病毒在实体器官移植配型不合受者中的传播:除抗病毒预防措施外,是否还有其他因素在起作用?
Am J Transplant. 2021 Dec;21(12):3958-3970. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16734. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
7
Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States.美国肾移植和胰腺移植受者巨细胞病毒血清学的地理分布
Transplant Direct. 2021 May 25;7(6):e704. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001147. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
The Association Between Cytomegalovirus and Disability by Race/Ethnicity and Sex: Results From the Health and Retirement Study.巨细胞病毒与种族/民族和性别残疾之间的关联:来自健康与退休研究的结果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 2;190(11):2314-2322. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab152.
9
Evaluation of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in low and intermediate risk kidney transplant recipients receiving lymphocyte-depleting induction.评价低危和中危肾移植受者接受淋巴细胞耗竭诱导治疗时的巨细胞病毒预防效果。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;23(4):e13573. doi: 10.1111/tid.13573. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
Increased incidence and unusual presentations of CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients after conversion to belatacept.在转换为贝利尤单抗后,肾移植受者中 CMV 疾病的发病率和表现形式增加。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jul;21(7):2448-2458. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16430. Epub 2021 Jan 2.