• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本癌症医院实施电子患者报告结局系统的障碍与促进因素

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System at Cancer Hospitals in Japan.

作者信息

Uneno Yu, Fukuyama Keita, Nishimura Ayumi, Eguchi Kana, Kojima Hideki, Umino Takeshi, Miyazaki Kikuko, Negora Eiju, Minashi Keiko, Sugiyama Osamu, Shimazu Taichi, Muto Manabu, Matsumoto Shigemi

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, JPN.

Division of Medical Information Technology and Administration Planning, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Apr 19;16(4):e58611. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58611. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.58611
PMID:38770482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11102941/
Abstract

Background and objective Implementing electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) in oncology practice has shown substantial clinical benefits. However, it can be challenging in routine practice, warranting strategies to adapt to different clinical contexts. In light of this, this study aimed to describe the implementation process of the ePRO system and elucidate the provider-level implementation barriers and facilitators to a novel ePRO system at cancer hospitals in Japan. Methods We implemented an ePRO system linked to electronic medical records at three cancer hospitals. Fifteen patients with solid cancers at the outpatient oncology unit were asked to regularly complete the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) questionnaire and European Organization for Research and Treatment Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) by using the smartphone app between October 2021 and June 2022. Thirteen healthcare professionals were interviewed to identify implementation barriers and facilitators to the ePRO system by using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework. Results The healthcare professionals identified a lack of clinical resources and a culture and system that emphasizes treatment over care as the main barriers; however, the accumulation of successful cases, the leadership of managers, and the growing needs of patients can serve as facilitators to the implementation. Conclusions Our experience implementing an ePRO system in a few Japanese oncology practices revealed comprehensive barriers and facilitators. Further efforts are warranted to develop more successful implementation strategies.

摘要

背景与目的 在肿瘤学实践中实施电子患者报告结局(ePROs)已显示出显著的临床益处。然而,在常规实践中可能具有挑战性,需要采取策略以适应不同的临床环境。有鉴于此,本研究旨在描述ePRO系统的实施过程,并阐明日本癌症医院中新型ePRO系统在提供者层面的实施障碍和促进因素。方法 我们在三家癌症医院实施了一个与电子病历相关联的ePRO系统。2021年10月至2022年6月期间,要求肿瘤门诊科室的15名实体癌患者使用智能手机应用程序定期完成不良事件通用术语标准患者报告结局版本(PRO-CTCAE™)问卷和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ C30)。通过使用实施研究综合框架,对13名医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈,以确定ePRO系统的实施障碍和促进因素。结果 医疗保健专业人员将临床资源的缺乏以及强调治疗而非护理的文化和系统确定为主要障碍;然而,成功案例的积累、管理人员的领导作用以及患者不断增长的需求可作为实施的促进因素。结论 我们在日本一些肿瘤学实践中实施ePRO系统的经验揭示了全面的障碍和促进因素。有必要进一步努力制定更成功的实施策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/64cc52b26332/cureus-0016-00000058611-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/e1deea0c69b7/cureus-0016-00000058611-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/dc1c76c27060/cureus-0016-00000058611-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/c83af8f39098/cureus-0016-00000058611-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/64cc52b26332/cureus-0016-00000058611-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/e1deea0c69b7/cureus-0016-00000058611-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/dc1c76c27060/cureus-0016-00000058611-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/c83af8f39098/cureus-0016-00000058611-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee00/11102941/64cc52b26332/cureus-0016-00000058611-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System at Cancer Hospitals in Japan.日本癌症医院实施电子患者报告结局系统的障碍与促进因素
Cureus. 2024 Apr 19;16(4):e58611. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58611. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Sustainability and Time Trends in Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment in Routine Cancer Care: Systematic Scoping Review and Follow-Up Survey.常规癌症护理中电子患者报告结局评估的可持续性和时间趋势:系统综述与随访调查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e69398. doi: 10.2196/69398.
3
Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for symptom management in oncology practice through the SIMPRO research consortium: a protocol for a pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation multi-center cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial.通过 SIMPRO 研究联盟在肿瘤学实践中实施患者报告的结局用于症状管理:一项实用型 II 型混合有效性-实施多中心群组随机阶梯式楔形试验的方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 16;23(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06435-1.
4
Using Implementation Science Frameworks to Guide the Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring in Routine Cancer Care.利用实施科学框架指导电子患者报告的症状监测在常规癌症护理中的使用。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Mar;20(3):335-349. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00462. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Adapting an integrated care pathway for implementing electronic patient reported outcomes assessment in routine oncology care: Lessons learned from a case study.改编综合护理路径以在常规肿瘤护理中实施电子患者报告结局评估:来自案例研究的经验教训。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;28(6):1072-1083. doi: 10.1111/jep.13688. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators in Using Patient-Reported Outcome Systems for Cancer Care: Systematic Mapping Study.癌症护理中使用患者报告结局系统的感知障碍与促进因素:系统映射研究
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Jun 28;9:e40875. doi: 10.2196/40875.
7
Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study.电子报告在癌症治疗期间脆弱且合并症较多的患者中的患者报告结局 - 一项可行性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 11;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01480-3.
8
Barriers and facilitators of implementing the practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour: A mixed-method study.第二产程实施直立位实践方案的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Nov 3. doi: 10.1111/jan.15927.
9
Implementation of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring in a Large Multisite Community Oncology Practice: Dancing the Texas Two-Step Through a Pandemic.在大型多地点社区肿瘤学实践中实施电子患者报告结局以进行症状监测:在大流行中跳德克萨斯两步舞。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:615-621. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00063.
10
Designing an Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Information Infrastructure Supported by the RE-AIM Implementation Framework.设计一个由RE-AIM实施框架支持的电子患者报告结局信息基础设施。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 1:2025.03.31.25324980. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.31.25324980.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and usefulness of symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes: an experience at single-center outpatient oncology clinic.电子患者报告结局用于症状监测的可行性和实用性:单中心肿瘤门诊的经验
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 4;33(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09062-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in the implementation of electronic systems for patient report of symptoms in oncology: a scoping review.肿瘤学中患者症状报告电子系统实施的挑战:一项范围综述
J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2021;5. doi: 10.21037/jhmhp-20-108. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
Trajectories of health-related quality of life and symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer towards the end of life: Longitudinal results from the eQuiPe study.晚期癌症患者临终前健康相关生活质量及症状负担轨迹:eQuiPe研究的纵向结果
Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;130(4):609-617. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35060. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a scoping review.
胃肠道癌症患者报告的结局测量信息系统:范围综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Sep 8;31(10):567. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08010-z.
4
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators in Using Patient-Reported Outcome Systems for Cancer Care: Systematic Mapping Study.癌症护理中使用患者报告结局系统的感知障碍与促进因素:系统映射研究
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Jun 28;9:e40875. doi: 10.2196/40875.
5
Assessing Quality of Life Using FHIR - How to Combine Patient Reported Outcome with Patient Generated Data for Better Compliance.使用 FHIR 评估生活质量 - 如何将患者报告的结果与患者生成的数据相结合以提高依从性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:135-136. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230083.
6
Single-arm studies involving patient-reported outcome data in oncology: a literature review on current practice.单臂研究中涉及肿瘤患者报告结局数据:当前实践的文献综述。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 May;24(5):e197-e206. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00110-9.
7
Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review.电子前瞻性监测模型在癌症护理中的实施:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Apr 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01265-4.
8
Applying Nudge to Public Health Policy: Practical Examples and Tips for Designing Nudge Interventions.应用推动因素于公共卫生政策:设计推动干预措施的实用示例和技巧。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053962.
9
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review.在医疗保健环境中实施电子患者报告的结果和体验测量的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Feb 14;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00554-2.
10
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.采用实施科学方法在常规护理环境中实施和评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)措施。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3015-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. Epub 2020 Jul 10.