Suppr超能文献

拼写原则很重要:一项探究不同类型伪同形词加工的 ERP 研究。

Spelling principles matter: An ERP study investigating the processing of different types of pseudohomophones.

机构信息

Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2024 Sep 15;1839:149012. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149012. Epub 2024 May 19.

Abstract

Spelling in any writing system is governed by fundamental principles. We examined the processing of two types of pseudohomophones constructed from words whose spellings are based on different principles - on the traditional principle of writing, requiring memorization of their spelling, and on the morphological principle, allowing the determination of their spelling from another word with the same morpheme (root) to examine the dependence of the occurrence of orthography-phonology conflict on spelling principles. Event-related potentials were recorded from 22 volunteers during silent reading. Pseudohomophones based on the morphological principle increased the N400 amplitude, emphasizing semantic and morphological processing importance. The P600 component showed significant effects for differentiating words and pseudohomophones based on the traditional principle, predominantly indicating the involvement of memory and reanalysis processes. Source reconstruction demonstrates that both pseudohomophones activate the left inferior frontal gyrus. However, pseudohomophones based on the traditional principle additionally activate the right and left postcentral gyrus, indicating the involvement of additional areas in the differentiation process. The earlier differences for stimuli based on the morphological principle indicate access to smaller units (morphemes), whereas stimuli based on the traditional principle require whole word processing. Our findings underscore the significant role of spelling principles in orthographic processing.

摘要

拼写在任何书写系统中都受基本规则的制约。我们研究了两种类型的假词的处理方式,这些假词的拼写基于不同的原则——传统的拼写原则要求记忆其拼写,而形态学原则则允许根据具有相同语素(词根)的另一个词来确定其拼写,以检验拼写规则对拼写-语音冲突的出现的依赖性。我们在 22 名志愿者默读时记录了事件相关电位。基于形态学原则的假词增加了 N400 振幅,强调了语义和形态处理的重要性。P600 成分对区分基于传统原则的词和假词有显著影响,主要表明记忆和重新分析过程的参与。源重建表明,两种假词都激活了左额下回。然而,基于传统原则的假词还额外激活了右额中和左中央后回,表明在区分过程中涉及到更多的区域。基于形态学原则的刺激的早期差异表明可以访问较小的单位(语素),而基于传统原则的刺激则需要处理整个单词。我们的发现强调了拼写规则在拼字处理中的重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验