• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的性别差异。

Gender differences in oral appliance treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

机构信息

Department of Research, Örebro University Hospital, Region Örebro County and Faculty of Medicine Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Region Västmanland - Uppsala University, Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2024 Aug;28(4):1723-1730. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03019-y. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11325-024-03019-y
PMID:38772967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11303471/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although overall success rates for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with an oral appliance (OA) are high, they are significantly higher among females. To verify published data, the study's purpose was to evaluate a participant sample after one year of OA use. The primary outcome was treatment response, with responders defined as having an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 10 at follow-up and/or reduced by ≥50% of baseline. Secondary measures were from standardized questionnaires.

METHODS

A sample of 314 participants, predominately with moderate-to-severe OSA, were enrolled and instructed to use an OA every night. At baseline and one-year follow-up, polygraphic recordings and questionnaires, including sleepiness (measured using the Epworth sleepiness scale) and quality-of-life (measured using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire), were collected.

RESULTS

Among the 314 participants, 192 completed the one-year evaluation: 51 females (27%) and 141 males (73%). Overall, OA treatment resulted in 78% and 77% responders among females and males, respectively. Neither the difference in improvement nor the absolute change in AHI differed significantly based on gender, at any OSA severity level. There were no significant gender differences in sleepiness or quality of life. Treatment-related adverse reactions were more common among females.

CONCLUSION

Both females and males with OSA respond well to OA therapy, with nonsignificant gender differences in outcomes. Thus, the hypothesis that females respond better to OA treatment is rejected.

摘要

目的

虽然使用口腔矫治器(OA)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的总体成功率很高,但女性的成功率明显更高。为了验证已发表的数据,本研究的目的是在使用 OA 一年后评估参与者样本。主要结果是治疗反应,定义为随访时呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)<10 和/或与基线相比降低≥50%。次要措施来自标准化问卷。

方法

纳入了 314 名主要患有中重度 OSA 的参与者,并指示他们每晚使用 OA。在基线和一年随访时,进行多导睡眠图记录和问卷调查,包括嗜睡(使用 Epworth 嗜睡量表测量)和生活质量(使用睡眠功能结果问卷测量)。

结果

在 314 名参与者中,有 192 名完成了一年的评估:女性 51 名(27%),男性 141 名(73%)。总体而言,OA 治疗分别使女性和男性的应答者比例达到 78%和 77%。无论 OSA 严重程度如何,性别差异在改善程度或 AHI 的绝对变化方面均无显著差异。在嗜睡或生活质量方面,性别差异无统计学意义。与治疗相关的不良反应在女性中更为常见。

结论

OSA 的女性和男性对 OA 治疗的反应均良好,结果无显著性别差异。因此,拒绝女性对 OA 治疗反应更好的假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdae/11303471/fdabe03bb7b8/11325_2024_3019_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdae/11303471/8ffc56bd1954/11325_2024_3019_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdae/11303471/fdabe03bb7b8/11325_2024_3019_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdae/11303471/8ffc56bd1954/11325_2024_3019_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdae/11303471/fdabe03bb7b8/11325_2024_3019_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in oral appliance treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.口腔矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的性别差异。
Sleep Breath. 2024 Aug;28(4):1723-1730. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03019-y. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Minimizing the mandibular advancement in an oral appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.在用于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的口腔矫治器中尽量减少下颌前伸。
Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:226-231. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
3
Oral appliance versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up.口腔矫治器与持续气道正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征:2 年随访。
Sleep. 2013 Sep 1;36(9):1289-96. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2948.
4
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of customized maxillary oral appliance with mandibular advancement appliance as a treatment modality for moderate obstructive sleep apnea patients-a randomized controlled trial.比较研究定制式上颌口腔矫治器与下颌前伸矫治器治疗中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07054-6.
5
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of customized maxillary oral appliance with mandibular advancement appliance as a treatment modality for moderate obstructive sleep apnea patients-protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较定制式上颌口腔矫治器与下颌前伸矫治器治疗中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者疗效的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 16;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06070-w.
6
Oral Appliance Therapy in Patients With Daytime Sleepiness and Snoring or Mild to Moderate Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口腔矫治器治疗日间嗜睡和打鼾或轻中度睡眠呼吸暂停患者的随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1278-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2051.
7
Selection of response criteria affects the success rate of oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea.反应标准的选择会影响阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停口腔矫治器治疗的成功率。
Sleep Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
8
Development of a physiological-based model that uses standard polysomnography and clinical data to predict oral appliance treatment outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.开发一种基于生理学的模型,该模型使用标准多导睡眠图和临床数据来预测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者使用口腔矫正器的治疗效果。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Mar 1;18(3):861-870. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9742.
9
Oral appliance treatment in moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnoea patients non-adherent to CPAP.对不依从持续气道正压通气治疗的中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者进行口腔矫治器治疗。
J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Apr;43(4):249-58. doi: 10.1111/joor.12376. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
10
Gradual reduction in the STOP score in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing oral appliance therapy.患者接受口腔矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停时,STOP 评分逐渐降低。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Aug 21;65(3):360-364. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00118. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
National Knowledge-Driven Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-The Swedish Approach.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的国家知识驱动管理——瑞典模式
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;13(6):1179. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061179.
2
Mandibular advancement device design: A systematic review on outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea treatment.下颌前伸装置设计:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗结局的系统评价。
Sleep Med Rev. 2021 Dec;60:101557. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101557. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
Respiratory outcomes after a 1-year treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea with bibloc versus monobloc oral appliances: a multicentre, randomized equivalence trial.
1 年治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的双颌定位与单颌定位口腔矫治器的呼吸结局:一项多中心、随机等效性试验。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Aug;78(6):401-408. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1730436. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Phenotypes of responders to mandibular advancement device therapy in obstructive sleep apnea patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.下颌前移装置治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者应答者表型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Feb;49:101229. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101229. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Sex differences in mandibular repositioning device therapy effectiveness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者下颌重新定位装置治疗效果的性别差异。
Sleep Breath. 2019 Sep;23(3):837-848. doi: 10.1007/s11325-018-1766-8. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Prevalence and association analysis of obstructive sleep apnea with gender and age differences - Results of SHIP-Trend.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与性别和年龄差异的患病率及相关性分析 - 来自 SHIP-Trend 的结果。
J Sleep Res. 2019 Oct;28(5):e12770. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12770. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Use of bibloc and monobloc oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnoea: a multicentre, randomized, blinded, parallel-group equivalence trial.双块式和单块式口腔矫治器在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的应用:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组等效性试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):80-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy030.
8
The influence of gender on symptoms associated with obstructive sleep apnea.性别对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停相关症状的影响。
Sleep Breath. 2018 Sep;22(3):683-693. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1612-4. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
A randomized cross over study comparing the efficacy of two mandibular advancement appliances in the treatment of mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnea.一项比较两种下颌前移矫治器治疗轻中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停疗效的随机交叉研究。
Cranio. 2017 Nov;35(6):379-384. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2016.1252563. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
10
Oral Appliance Therapy in Patients With Daytime Sleepiness and Snoring or Mild to Moderate Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口腔矫治器治疗日间嗜睡和打鼾或轻中度睡眠呼吸暂停患者的随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1278-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2051.