Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗及随后前哨淋巴结活检治疗的局部晚期乳腺癌患者的生存及推断分析:前瞻性单中心研究

Survival and inferential analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy: prospective single-center study.

作者信息

Espejo Niño Johanna Marcela

机构信息

Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain.

出版信息

EJNMMI Rep. 2024 May 22;8(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41824-024-00202-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lymph node staging is the major prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows an exactly axillar staging in patients with early disease, but not in locally advance breast cancer (LABC). Our aim was to study, the feasibility and accuracy of the SLNB technique with and without axillar lymphadenectomy (LDN) and with lymph node clipping after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), in patients with LABC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LABC, scheduled for NAC and subsequent surgery and SLNB. Subsequently the patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy/hormonotherapy and radiotherapy according with the postsurgical results. Main end points were overall survival (OS) disease-free survival (DFS), mortality, SLNB identification rate (IR), sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB versus LDN, negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy.

RESULTS

Our IR with different techniques was between 89.9 and 100%. OS was between 89 and 97%. DFS was between 89.8 and 96.8%. Sensitivity was between 75 and 100%. NPV was between 89.6 and 100%. FNR was between 0 and 25%; and accuracy was between 66 and 72%. We found that survival was lower (p < 0.05) in patients with triple negative and Luminal B/HER2 intrinsic subtype; with progression or major partial response in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results at the end of NAC and in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents excellent results of SLNB alone in patients with LABC with complete nodal response with an OS and DFS > 95%. The FNR is very high in partial responders, so we cannot recommend the SLNB alone in LABC. We recommend, in cN+ patients, axillar clipping, SLNB and LDN because in more than 50% of the patients with axillar clipping, this was not found, and because in 36% of the patients with negative LDN, the SLN (Sentinel Lymph Node) obtained was the only positive node, so these techniques together decrease the FNR and improve the node staging, OS and DFS. This study is the first prospective study that assess OS and DFS in patients with LABC, all submitted to SLNB.

摘要

背景

淋巴结分期是乳腺癌患者的主要预后因素。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)可对早期疾病患者进行准确的腋窝分期,但对局部进展期乳腺癌(LABC)患者则不然。我们的目的是研究在LABC患者中,新辅助化疗(NAC)后行或不行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(LDN)以及淋巴结夹闭的情况下,SLNB技术的可行性和准确性。

患者与方法

诊断为LABC的患者,计划接受NAC及后续手术和SLNB。随后根据手术结果安排患者接受辅助化疗/激素治疗和放疗。主要终点为总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、死亡率、SLNB识别率(IR)、敏感性、SLNB与LDN相比的假阴性率(FNR)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性。

结果

我们采用不同技术的IR在89.9%至100%之间。OS在89%至97%之间。DFS在89.8%至96.8%之间。敏感性在75%至100%之间。NPV在89.6%至100%之间。FNR在0至25%之间;准确性在66%至72%之间。我们发现三阴性和Luminal B/HER2内在亚型患者、NAC结束时磁共振成像(MRI)结果显示有进展或主要部分缓解的患者以及携带BRCA1/2突变的患者生存率较低(p<0.05)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在LABC患者中,若淋巴结完全反应,单独行SLNB可取得优异结果,OS和DFS>95%。部分反应者的FNR非常高,因此我们不建议在LABC中单独行SLNB。我们建议,对于cN+患者,进行腋窝夹闭、SLNB和LDN,因为在超过50%的腋窝夹闭患者中未发现腋窝淋巴结,且在36%的LDN阴性患者中,获得的前哨淋巴结(SLN)是唯一的阳性淋巴结,所以这些技术联合使用可降低FNR并改善淋巴结分期、OS和DFS。本研究是第一项评估所有接受SLNB的LABC患者OS和DFS的前瞻性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e5a/11109070/7238f5d4ab6d/41824_2024_202_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验