Geczik Ashley M, Lee Jin, Allen Joseph A, Raposa Madison E, Robinson Lucy F, Quistberg D Alex, Davis Andrea L, Taylor Jennifer A
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Inj Epidemiol. 2024 May 21;11(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00502-8.
The Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey is an assessment tool comprised of psychometrically validated metrics of safety climate, safety behavior, and downstream outcomes (organizational and injury) that are specific to the U.S. fire and rescue service.
This analysis consists of a descriptive summary of two independent survey waves (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0). The fire departments included in these survey waves were from convenience sampling (n = 275; n = 170). In addition to department level characteristics, we examined individual level characteristics for firefighters and EMS providers in participating departments (n = 22,719; n = 16,882). We conducted regression analyses to examine the associations between safety climate and safety behaviors, organizational outcomes, and safety outcomes. All analyses were stratified by organization type (career, volunteer).
Our analysis indicated that a majority of respondents were males (90.7%; 90.4%), non-officers (68.4%; 66.4%), and non-Hispanic Whites (70.8%; 69.5%). For both samples there was a higher prevalence of injuries among individuals in career departments (n = 3778 [17.5%]; n = 3072 [18.7%]) than volunteer departments (n = 103 [8.8%]; n = 34 [7.4%]). We observed an approximate 10-point difference between the mean scores of Management Commitment to Safety for career and volunteer departments in both samples. We observed associations for two organizational outcomes, Safety Behavior and Job Satisfaction, with Management Commitment to Safety and Supervisor Support for Safety overall and when stratified by organization type. We observed a decrease in the odds of injuries associated with a one-unit increase in Management Commitment to Safety (OR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; OR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95) and Supervisor Support for Safety (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97; OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98).
From our current study, and a prior analysis of a geographically stratified random sample of U.S. fire departments, we identified that from all the organizational outcomes, job satisfaction was most consistently associated with FOCUS safety climate. Further, firefighters in our samples consistently rated Supervisor Support for Safety higher than Management Commitment to Safety. Future interventions should support fire departments in improving their departmental Management Commitment to Safety and maintaining their Supervisor for Safety.
消防部门安全组织文化(FOCUS)调查是一种评估工具,由针对美国消防和救援服务的安全氛围、安全行为及下游结果(组织层面和伤害层面)的心理测量学验证指标组成。
本分析包括对两个独立调查阶段(FOCUS 1.0和2.0)的描述性总结。这些调查阶段纳入的消防部门采用方便抽样(n = 275;n = 170)。除部门层面特征外,我们还研究了参与部门中消防员和急救医疗服务提供者的个人层面特征(n = 22,719;n = 16,882)。我们进行了回归分析,以检验安全氛围与安全行为、组织结果和安全结果之间的关联。所有分析均按组织类型(职业、志愿)分层。
我们的分析表明,大多数受访者为男性(90.7%;90.4%)、非官员(68.4%;66.4%)和非西班牙裔白人(70.8%;69.5%)。在两个样本中,职业部门人员的受伤发生率(n = 3778 [17.5%];n = 3072 [18.7%])均高于志愿部门(n = 103 [8.8%];n = 34 [7.4%])。在两个样本中,我们观察到职业部门和志愿部门在安全管理承诺平均得分上存在约10分的差异。我们观察到,总体而言以及按组织类型分层时,安全行为和工作满意度这两个组织结果与安全管理承诺和安全主管支持之间存在关联。我们观察到,安全管理承诺每增加一个单位,受伤几率降低(比值比:0.98,95%置信区间0.97 - 0.99;比值比:0.90,95%置信区间0.85 - 0.95),安全主管支持每增加一个单位,受伤几率也降低(比值比:0.95,95%置信区间0.93 - 0.97;比值比:0.95,95%置信区间0.92 - 0.98)。
根据我们目前的研究以及之前对美国消防部门地理分层随机样本的分析,我们发现,在所有组织结果中,工作满意度与FOCUS安全氛围的关联最为一致。此外,我们样本中的消防员对安全主管支持的评分一直高于对安全管理承诺的评分。未来的干预措施应支持消防部门提高其部门对安全的管理承诺,并维持其安全主管的支持。