School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
VM Partners Integrating Health and Care, Lisbon, Portugal.
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14084. doi: 10.1111/hex.14084.
Integrated care is based around values of involvement and shared decision-making, but these are not often reflected within planning and implementation. Barriers include continued emphasis on professional and managerial perspectives, skills gaps on how best to engage people and communities and insufficient investment in involvement infrastructure. Despite such challenges, people with lived experience have still led changes in policy and services.
Qualitative study involving 25 participants with lived experience from 12 countries. Participants shared their background stories and engaged in semistructured interviews relating to leadership identity, experience of influencing and personal learning. Transcripts were analysed through a framework approach informed by narrative principles.
Participants were motivated by their own experiences and a wish to improve care for future individuals and communities. Sharing their story was often the entry point for such influencing. Participants gained skills and confidence in story telling despite a lack of support and development. Many felt comfortable being described as a leader while others rejected this identity and preferred a different title. No common alternative term to leader was identified. Influencing services required considerable personal cost but also led to new networks, skills development and satisfaction when change was achieved.
Leadership within integrated care is often awarded to those with structural power related to management or clinical seniority. People with lived experience are though uniquely placed to identify what needs to change and can develop inspiring visions based around their personal stories. Claiming identity as leader can be challenging due to traditional notions of who is eligible to lead and unwillingness by professionals and managers to grant such identity.
People with lived experience should be recognised as leaders of integrated care and have access to developmental opportunities and practical support to strengthen their skills, including that of storytelling. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research was instigated on the request of a community advisory board of people with lived experience who shaped its design, contributed to the analysis and informed the conclusions and implications.
综合关怀以参与和共同决策为价值观,但这些价值观在规划和实施过程中并不常见。障碍包括对专业和管理视角的持续强调、如何最好地让人们和社区参与的技能差距,以及对参与基础设施的投资不足。尽管面临这些挑战,具有生活经验的人仍然引领了政策和服务的变革。
一项涉及来自 12 个国家的 25 名具有生活经验的参与者的定性研究。参与者分享了他们的背景故事,并参与了与领导身份、影响经验和个人学习相关的半结构化访谈。记录通过框架方法进行分析,该方法受叙事原则的启发。
参与者的动机是他们自己的经验以及为未来个人和社区改善护理的愿望。分享他们的故事通常是这种影响的切入点。尽管缺乏支持和发展,参与者还是在讲故事方面获得了技能和信心。许多人对被描述为领导者感到舒适,而其他人则拒绝这种身份,更喜欢不同的头衔。没有确定到与领导者通用的替代术语。影响服务需要相当大的个人成本,但当实现变革时,也会带来新的网络、技能发展和满足感。
综合关怀中的领导通常授予与管理或临床资历相关的结构权力的人。然而,具有生活经验的人最适合确定需要改变的内容,并可以基于他们的个人故事制定鼓舞人心的愿景。由于传统的领导资格观念以及专业人员和管理人员不愿意授予这种身份,因此,声称自己是领导者可能具有挑战性。
具有生活经验的人应被视为综合关怀的领导者,并获得发展机会和实际支持,以加强他们的技能,包括讲故事的技能。
这项研究是应具有生活经验的社区咨询委员会的要求发起的,该委员会塑造了研究的设计,为分析做出了贡献,并为结论和影响提供了信息。