• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国腹主动脉瘤治疗的时间趋势和结果。

Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville (B.F.G., S.T.S., D.N., T.S.H.).

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Italy (M.D.O.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010374. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010374. Epub 2024 May 22.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010374
PMID:38775052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11187661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has had a dynamic impact on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) care, often supplanting open AAA repair (OAR). Accordingly, US AAA management is often highlighted by disparities in patient selection and guideline compliance. The purpose of this analysis was to define secular trends in AAA care.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for all EVARs and OARs (2011-2021). End points included procedure utilization, change in mortality, patient risk profile, Society for Vascular Surgery-endorsed diameter compliance, off-label EVAR use, cross-clamp location, blood loss, in-hospital complications, and post-EVAR surveillance missingness. Linear regression was used without risk adjustment for all end points except for mortality and complications, for which logistic regression with risk adjustment was used.

RESULTS

In all, 66 609 EVARs (elective, 85% [n=55 805] and nonelective, 15% [n=9976]) and 13 818 OARs (elective, 70% [n=9706] and nonelective, 30% [n=4081]) were analyzed. Elective EVAR:OAR ratios were increased (0.2 per year [95% CI, 0.01-0.32]), while nonelective ratios were unchanged. Elective diameter threshold noncompliance decreased for OAR (24%→17%; =0.01) but not EVAR (mean, 37%). Low-risk patients increasingly underwent elective repairs (EVAR, +0.4%per year [95% CI, 0.2-0.6]; OAR, +0.6 points per year [95% CI, 0.2-1.0]). Off-label EVAR frequency was unchanged (mean, 39%) but intraoperative complications decreased (0.5% per year [95% CI, 0.2-0.9]). OAR complexity increased reflecting greater suprarenal cross-clamp rates (0.4% per year [95% CI, 0.1-0.8]) and blood loss (33 mL/y [95% CI, 19-47]). In-hospital complications decreased for elective (0.7% per year [95% CI, 0.4-0.9]) and nonelective EVAR (1.7% per year [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]) but not OAR (mean, 42%). A 30-day mortality was unchanged for both elective OAR (mean, 4%) and EVAR (mean, 1%). Among nonelective OARs, an increase in both 30-day (0.8% per year [95% CI, 0.1-1.5]) and 1-year mortality (0.8% per year [95% CI, 0.3-1.6]) was observed. Postoperative EVAR surveillance acquisition decreased (67%→49%), while 1-year mortality among patients without imaging was 4-fold greater (9.2% versus imaging, 2.0%; odds ratio, 4.1 [95% CI, 3.8-4.3]; <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been an increase in EVAR and a corresponding reduction in OAR across the United States, despite established concerns surrounding guideline adherence, reintervention, follow-up, and cost. Although EVAR morbidity has declined, OAR complication rates remain unchanged and unexpectedly high. Opportunities remain for improving AAA care delivery, patient and procedure selection, guideline compliance, and surveillance.

摘要

背景

血管内主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的治疗产生了深远的影响,通常取代了开放型AAA 修复术(OAR)。因此,美国的 AAA 管理通常以患者选择和指南遵循方面的差异为特点。本分析的目的是确定 AAA 治疗的长期趋势。

方法

从血管外科学会血管质量倡议中查询所有 EVAR 和 OAR(2011-2021 年)。终点包括手术使用率、死亡率变化、患者风险特征、血管外科学会认可的直径合规性、非适应证 EVAR 使用率、夹闭位置、失血量、住院并发症和 EVAR 后随访缺失。除死亡率和并发症外,所有终点均使用无风险调整的线性回归,对于需要风险调整的死亡率和并发症,使用逻辑回归。

结果

共分析了 66609 例 EVAR(择期,85%[n=55805]和非择期,15%[n=9976])和 13818 例 OAR(择期,70%[n=9706]和非择期,30%[n=4081])。择期 EVAR:OAR 比值增加(每年 0.2[95%CI,0.01-0.32]),而非择期比值保持不变。OAR 的非适应证直径阈值不达标率下降(24%→17%;=0.01),而非适应证 EVAR 未下降(平均,37%)。低风险患者越来越多地接受择期修复(EVAR,每年增加 0.4%[95%CI,0.2-0.6];OAR,每年增加 0.6 分[95%CI,0.2-1.0])。非适应证 EVAR 的频率保持不变(平均 39%),但术中并发症减少(每年 0.5%[95%CI,0.2-0.9])。OAR 的复杂性增加,反映出更高的肾上腹主动脉夹闭率(每年 0.4%[95%CI,0.1-0.8])和失血量(33mL/y[95%CI,19-47])。择期(每年 0.7%[95%CI,0.4-0.9])和非择期 EVAR(每年 1.7%[95%CI,1.1-2.3])的住院并发症减少,但 OAR 没有(平均 42%)。择期 OAR(平均 4%)和 EVAR(平均 1%)的 30 天死亡率保持不变。在非择期 OAR 中,30 天(每年 0.8%[95%CI,0.1-1.5])和 1 年死亡率(每年 0.8%[95%CI,0.3-1.6])均增加。术后 EVAR 随访获取率下降(67%→49%),而无影像学检查的患者 1 年死亡率增加了 4 倍(9.2%与影像学检查相比,2.0%;比值比,4.1[95%CI,3.8-4.3];<0.0001)。

结论

尽管存在围绕指南遵循、再干预、随访和成本的担忧,但美国的 EVAR 数量增加,而 OAR 数量相应减少。尽管 EVAR 的发病率有所下降,但 OAR 的并发症发生率保持不变,且出乎意料地很高。仍有机会改善 AAA 治疗的提供、患者和手术选择、指南遵循和监测。

相似文献

1
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care in the United States.美国腹主动脉瘤治疗的时间趋势和结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010374. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010374. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Elective endovascular aneurysm repair in the elderly: trends and outcomes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.老年患者的择期血管内动脉瘤修复术:来自全国住院患者样本的趋势与结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
3
Variation in the choice of elective surgical procedure for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Spain.西班牙腹主动脉瘤择期手术方式的选择差异。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019 Apr 8;15:69-79. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S191451. eCollection 2019.
4
Impact of Gradual Adoption of EVAR in Elective Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Retrospective Cohort Study from 2009 to 2015.逐渐采用 EVAR 治疗择期修复腹主动脉瘤的影响:一项 2009 年至 2015 年的回顾性队列研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;70:411-424. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Risk factors and outcomes for bowel ischemia after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.开放和血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后肠缺血的风险因素和结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):869-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.047. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Duplex Ultrasound-Only Surveillance after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair is Associated with Favorable Long-Term Outcomes.单纯采用双层超声进行腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的随访与长期良好结局相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;108:112-126. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
7
Association between surgeon case volume and years of practice experience with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes.外科医生手术量与开放腹主动脉瘤修复结果的实践经验年限之间的关联。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1213-1226.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.065. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Center volume and failure to rescue after open or endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.破裂腹主动脉瘤开放或血管腔内修复后的中心容积与未能成功挽救生命的情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1565-1576.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.022. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
Association between diabetes status and long-term outcomes following open and endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.糖尿病状况与内脏动脉瘤开放和血管内修复术后长期结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1685-1696.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.030. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
10
Non-guideline-compliant endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women is associated with increased mortality and reintervention compared with men.与男性相比,女性非符合指南的血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术与死亡率增加和再次干预相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):118-125.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.109. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the effect of IMPEDE-FX packing rate and volume on pressure-normalized principal wall strain in an idealized 3D-printed aneurysm model.在理想化的3D打印动脉瘤模型中,量化IMPEDE-FX填充率和体积对压力归一化主壁应变的影响。
JVS Vasc Sci. 2025 Apr 15;6:100287. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2025.100287. eCollection 2025.
2
When Endovascular Interventions for Endoleaks Fail.当血管内介入治疗内漏失败时。
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jan 6;41(6):554-559. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800954. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The Justification of Open Surgical Repair for an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and a Brief Review of the Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Early Death after Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.择期开放腹主动脉瘤修复术后早期死亡分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;96:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
The Global and Regional Prevalence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Modeling Analysis.全球和区域性腹主动脉瘤的患病率:系统评价和建模分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):912-919. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005716. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Center volume and failure to rescue after open or endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
腹主动脉瘤开放手术修复的合理性:血管内动脉瘤修复术结果的回顾性比较及文献简要综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 8;15(3):426. doi: 10.3390/life15030426.
4
Percutaneous Closure Device Controlled INCRAFT Stentgraft Implantation Registry (PUCCINI).经皮闭合装置控制的INCRAFT覆膜支架植入注册研究(PUCCINI)。
CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Feb 8;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00523-4.
破裂腹主动脉瘤开放或血管腔内修复后的中心容积与未能成功挽救生命的情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1565-1576.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.022. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Trends in annual open abdominal aortic surgical volumes for vascular trainees compared with annual national volumes in the endovascular era.血管外科受训者每年开放腹主动脉手术量与腔内时代全国年度量的趋势比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;76(4):1079-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.887. Epub 2022 May 19.
5
Long-term Outcomes Associated With Open vs Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Medicare-Matched Database.在 Medicare 匹配数据库中,与开放手术和血管内修复腹主动脉瘤相关的长期结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12081.
6
Novel surgical quality metrics in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.腹主动脉瘤修复中的新型手术质量指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1229-1237.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.877. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Contemporary incidence, outcomes, and survival associated with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair conversion to open repair among Medicare beneficiaries.在 Medicare 受益人群中,与血管内主动脉瘤修复转为开放修复相关的当代发生率、结局和生存情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):671-679.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.036. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
8
Evaluating proximal clamp site and intraoperative ischemia time among open repair of juxtarenal aneurysms.评价肾周动脉瘤开放修复术中近侧夹闭部位和术中缺血时间。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):411-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.126. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
A significant proportion of current endovascular aortic aneurysm repair practice fails to meet Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guideline recommended abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter treatment thresholds in the Vascular Quality Initiative.在血管外科学会质量倡议中,目前很大一部分血管内主动脉瘤修复实践不符合血管外科学会临床实践指南建议的腹主动脉瘤直径治疗阈值。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1234-1241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.109. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
Center volume is associated with diminished failure to rescue and improved outcomes following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.中心体积与择期开放腹主动脉瘤修复后失败救援减少和改善结局相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):400-408.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.076. Epub 2022 Jan 26.