SafeWork SA, Adelaide, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
Ergonomics. 2024 Dec;67(12):1845-1862. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2354379. Epub 2024 May 22.
The 'Sit-Stand -Guide' -training program, designed to promote appropriate use of sit-stand workstations (SSWs), was evaluated for usability, acceptability and impact on various outcomes among SSW users. Participants from a large municipal organisation (25% male; mean age 45 [SD = 10.6] years) completed questionnaires pre-training (T0, = 57), immediately post-training (T1, = 50), and four weeks (T2, = 46: primary endpoint) and twelve months later (T3, = 30). High usability, acceptability and usefulness scores were reported at T1. Median [IQR] knowledge (4.4/5 [0.9]) and confidence (4.6/5 [1.0]) significantly increased at T1 compared to baseline (2.8 [1.2]; 3.3 [1.4]) and maintained at T2 and T3. At T2, mean [SD] sitting time (5.3 [1.2] h/workday) and low back discomfort (2.4 [2.3]) significantly decreased compared to baseline (6.1 [1.3] h; 3.4 [2.5] discomfort), SSW usage increased (1.4 [1.4]-2.8 [1.7] transitions), with no significant changes in work performance. Some behavioural changes were sustained at T3. The Sit-Stand -Guide was acceptable and effective; evaluation across diverse workplaces and workers is now needed.
“坐立-指南”培训计划旨在促进坐立工作站（SSW）的合理使用，我们评估了其在 SSW 用户中的可用性、可接受性和对各种结果的影响。来自一个大型市政组织的参与者（25%为男性；平均年龄 45 [SD = 10.6] 岁）在培训前（T0，n=57）、培训后即刻（T1，n=50）、四周后（T2，n=46：主要终点）和 12 个月后（T3，n=30）完成了问卷调查。T1 时报告了较高的可用性、可接受性和有用性评分。T1 时的知识（4.4/5 [0.9]）和信心（4.6/5 [1.0]）中位数[IQR]与基线（2.8 [1.2]；3.3 [1.4]）相比显著增加，并且在 T2 和 T3 时仍保持不变。T2 时，与基线相比（6.1 [1.3] h/工作日；3.4 [2.5] 不适），平均[SD]坐姿时间（5.3 [1.2] h/工作日）和下背痛不适（2.4 [2.3]）显著减少，SSW 使用量增加（1.4 [1.4]-2.8 [1.7] 次），工作绩效无显著变化。T3 时一些行为改变仍持续存在。“坐立-指南”是可接受且有效的；现在需要在不同的工作场所和员工中进行评估。
