Jackson Robert, Kim Audery, Moroz Nikolay, Damiani L Felipe, Grieco Domenico Luca, Piraino Thomas, Friedrich Jan O, Mercat Alain, Telias Irene, Brochard Laurent J
Keenan Centre for Biomedical Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute and St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 May 22;14(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01303-4.
Reverse triggering (RT) was described in 2013 as a form of patient-ventilator asynchrony, where patient's respiratory effort follows mechanical insufflation. Diagnosis requires esophageal pressure (P) or diaphragmatic electrical activity (EA), but RT can also be diagnosed using standard ventilator waveforms.
We wondered (1) how frequently RT would be present but undetected in the figures from literature, especially before 2013; (2) whether it would be more prevalent in the era of small tidal volumes after 2000.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 1950 to 2017, with key words related to asynchrony to identify papers with figures including ventilator waveforms expected to display RT if present. Experts labelled waveforms. 'Definite' RT was identified when P or EA were in the tracing, and 'possible' RT when only flow and pressure waveforms were present. Expert assessment was compared to the author's descriptions of waveforms.
We found 65 appropriate papers published from 1977 to now, containing 181 ventilator waveforms. 21 cases of 'possible' RT and 25 cases of 'definite' RT were identified by the experts. 18.8% of waveforms prior to 2013 had evidence of RT. Most cases were published after 2000 (1 before vs. 45 after, p = 0.03). 54% of RT cases were attributed to different phenomena. A few cases of identified RT were already described prior to 2013 using different terminology (earliest in 1997). While RT cases attributed to different phenomena decreased after 2013, 60% of 'possible' RT remained missed.
RT has been present in the literature as early as 1997, but most cases were found after the introduction of low tidal volume ventilation in 2000. Following 2013, the number of undetected cases decreased, but RT are still commonly missed. Reverse Triggering, A Missed Phenomenon in the Literature. Critical Care Canada Forum 2019 Abstracts. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 67 (Suppl 1), 1-162 (2020). https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01552-z .
反向触发(RT)在2013年被描述为一种患者-呼吸机不同步的形式,即患者的呼吸努力跟随机械通气。诊断需要食管压力(P)或膈肌电活动(EA),但RT也可通过标准呼吸机波形进行诊断。
我们想知道(1)在文献中的数据中,尤其是2013年之前,RT出现但未被检测到的频率有多高;(2)在2000年后小潮气量时代它是否更普遍。
我们检索了1950年至2017年的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,使用与不同步相关的关键词来识别包含预期显示RT(若存在)的呼吸机波形的数据的论文。专家对波形进行标注。当描记图中有P或EA时识别为“确定”RT,当仅存在流量和压力波形时识别为“可能”RT。将专家评估与作者对波形的描述进行比较。
我们发现从1977年至今发表了65篇合适的论文,包含181个呼吸机波形。专家识别出21例“可能”RT和25例“确定”RT。2013年之前的波形中有18.8%有RT的证据。大多数病例发表于2000年之后(2000年前1例 vs. 2000年后45例,p = 0.03)。54%的RT病例归因于不同现象。一些已识别的RT病例在2013年之前就已用不同术语描述过(最早在1997年)。虽然2013年后归因于不同现象的RT病例减少,但60%的“可能”RT仍未被发现。
RT在文献中早在1997年就已存在,但大多数病例是在2000年引入低潮气量通气后发现的。2013年后,未被检测到的病例数量减少,但RT仍经常被漏诊。反向触发,文献中被遗漏的现象。加拿大重症监护论坛2019年摘要。《加拿大麻醉学杂志》/《加拿大麻醉学杂志》67(增刊1),1 - 162(2020)。https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01552-z 。