• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰十二指肠切除术后的出血部位和缓解策略。

Hemorrhage Sites and Mitigation Strategies After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

机构信息

Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of General Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Aug 1;159(8):891-899. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1228.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1228
PMID:38776076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11112495/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinical evidence often draws suspicion to the gastroduodenal artery stump, even without a clear source.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of gastroduodenal artery bleeding compared to other sites and the results of mitigation strategies.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved a retrospective analysis of data for consecutive patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2011 to 2021 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH).

EXPOSURES

Demographic, perioperative, and disease-related variables.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The incidence, location, treatment, and outcomes of primary (initial) and secondary (recurrent) hemorrhage requiring invasive intervention were analyzed. Imaging studies were re-reviewed by interventional radiologists to confirm sites.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 3040 patients (n = 1761 MSK, n = 1279 TJUH). Patients from both institutions were similar in age (median [IQR] age at MSK, 67 [59-74] years, and at TJUH, 68 [60-75] years) and sex (at MSK, 814 female [46.5%] and 947 male [53.8%], and at TJUH, 623 [48.7%] and 623 male [51.3%]). Primary hemorrhage occurred in 90 patients (3.0%), of which the gastroduodenal artery was the source in 15 (16.7%), unidentified sites in 24 (26.7%), and non-gastroduodenal artery sites in 51 (56.7%). Secondary hemorrhage occurred in 23 patients; in 4 (17.4%), the gastroduodenal artery was the source. Of all hemorrhage events (n = 117), the gastroduodenal artery was the source in 19 (16.2%, 0.63% incidence in all pancreaticoduodenectomies). Gastroduodenal artery hemorrhage was more often associated with soft gland texture (14 [93.3%] vs 41 [62.1%]; P = .02) and later presentation (median [IQR], 21 [15-26] vs 10 days [5-18]; P = .002). Twenty-three patients underwent empirical gastroduodenal artery embolization or stent placement, 7 (30.4%) of whom subsequently experienced secondary hemorrhage. Twenty percent of all gastroduodenal artery embolizations/stents (8/40 patients), including 13% (3/13 patients) of empirical treatments, were associated with significant morbidity (7 hepatic infarction, 4 biliary stricture), with a 90-day mortality rate of 38.5% (n = 5) for patients with these complications vs 7.8% without (n = 6; P = .008). Ninety-day mortality was 12.2% (n = 11) for patients with hemorrhage (3 patients [20%] with primary gastroduodenal vs 8 [10.7%] for all others; P = .38) compared with 2% (n = 59) for patients without hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was uncommon and the spectrum was broad, with the gastroduodenal artery responsible for a minority of bleeding events. Empirical gastroduodenal artery embolization/stent without obvious sequelae of recent hemorrhage was associated with significant morbidity and rebleeding and should not be routine practice. Successful treatment of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage requires careful assessment of all potential sources, even after gastroduodenal artery mitigation.

摘要

背景:胰十二指肠切除术后出血是一种罕见但高度致命的并发症。临床证据常常怀疑胃十二指肠动脉残端,但即使没有明确的来源也是如此。

目的:确定胃十二指肠动脉出血与其他部位出血的频率以及缓解策略的结果。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2021 年期间在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSK)和托马斯杰斐逊大学医院(TJUH)接受胰十二指肠切除术的连续患者的数据。

暴露因素:人口统计学、围手术期和疾病相关变量。

主要结果和措施:分析了原发性(初始)和继发性(复发性)需要侵入性干预的出血的发生率、位置、治疗和结果。对影像学研究进行了重新审查,由介入放射科医生确认部位。

结果:符合纳入标准的患者共有 3040 名(n=1761 MSK,n=1279 TJUH)。来自两个机构的患者在年龄(MSK 中位数[IQR]年龄为 67 [59-74]岁,TJUH 为 68 [60-75]岁)和性别(MSK 为 814 名女性[46.5%]和 947 名男性[53.8%],TJUH 为 623 名[48.7%]和 623 名男性[51.3%])方面相似。90 名患者(3.0%)发生原发性出血,其中胃十二指肠动脉为 15 名(16.7%),未确定部位 24 名(26.7%),非胃十二指肠动脉部位 51 名(56.7%)。发生继发性出血 23 例,其中 4 例(17.4%)为胃十二指肠动脉来源。在所有出血事件(n=117)中,胃十二指肠动脉为 19 例(16.2%,所有胰十二指肠切除术中的发生率为 0.63%)。胃十二指肠动脉出血更常与软腺质地有关(14 [93.3%] vs 41 [62.1%];P=0.02)和较晚出现(中位数[IQR],21 [15-26] vs 10 天[5-18];P=0.002)。23 名患者接受了胃十二指肠动脉栓塞或支架置入术,其中 7 名(30.4%)随后发生继发性出血。所有胃十二指肠动脉栓塞/支架治疗中(40 名患者中的 8 名,包括 13%(13 名患者中的 3 名)的经验性治疗)有 20%(8 名患者)出现显著并发症(7 名肝梗死,4 名胆管狭窄),90 天死亡率为 38.5%(n=5),并发症患者与无并发症患者(n=6;P=0.008)。出血患者 90 天死亡率为 12.2%(n=11),其中 3 名患者(20%)为原发性胃十二指肠动脉,其余 8 名患者(10.7%);无出血患者 90 天死亡率为 2%(n=59)。

结论:在这项研究中,胰十二指肠切除术后出血罕见,范围广泛,胃十二指肠动脉仅占出血事件的少数。在近期出血无明显后遗症的情况下,经验性胃十二指肠动脉栓塞/支架治疗与显著的发病率和再出血有关,不应作为常规治疗。成功治疗胰十二指肠切除术后出血需要仔细评估所有潜在的出血源,即使在胃十二指肠动脉缓解后也是如此。

相似文献

1
Hemorrhage Sites and Mitigation Strategies After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后的出血部位和缓解策略。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Aug 1;159(8):891-899. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1228.
2
Wrapping the stump of the gastroduodenal artery using the ligamentum teres hepatis during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a center's preliminary experience.在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中使用肝圆韧带包裹胃十二指肠动脉残端:中心的初步经验。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01076-8.
3
Preventive covered stent placement at the gastroduodenal artery stump in angiogram-negative sentinel hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.预防性覆盖支架置入术在胰十二指肠切除术后造影阴性哨兵出血的胃十二指肠动脉残端。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):4995-5006. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03123-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Two forms of one complication: Late erosive and nonerosive postpancreatectomy hemorrhage following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.一种并发症的两种形式:腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后迟发性侵蚀性和非侵蚀性胰十二指肠切除术后出血。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16394. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016394.
5
Wrapping gastroduodenal artery stump with the teres hepatis ligament to prevent postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.用肝圆韧带包裹胃十二指肠动脉残端预防胰十二指肠切除术后出血。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov 27;21(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03218-z.
6
Risk factors for post-pancreaticoduodenectomy bleeding and finding an innovative approach to treatment.胰十二指肠切除术后出血的危险因素及治疗方法的创新。
Dig Surg. 2009;26(4):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000228245. Epub 2009 Jul 11.
7
Endovascular management of extrahepatic artery hemorrhage after pancreatobiliary surgery: clinical features and outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization and stent-graft placement.经导管动脉栓塞和支架置入术治疗胰胆手术后肝外动脉出血的血管内治疗:临床特点和转归。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):W627-34. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5148.
8
Late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage from the gastroduodenal artery stump into an insufficient hepaticojejunostomy: a case report.胰十二指肠切除术后晚期胃十二指肠动脉残端出血进入肝空肠吻合口不充分:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2021 Apr 29;15(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-02743-3.
9
Transcatheter arterial embolization of gastroduodenal artery stump pseudoaneurysms after pancreaticoduodenectomy: safety and efficacy of two embolization techniques.经导管动脉栓塞术治疗胰十二指肠切除术后胃十二指肠动脉残端假性动脉瘤:两种栓塞技术的安全性和有效性。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Mar;22(3):294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.11.020.
10
Covered stent placement for gastroduodenal artery stump hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: long-term patency and risk factor of stent failure.覆膜支架置入治疗胰十二指肠切除术后胃十二指肠动脉残端出血:支架通畅的长期效果和失败的危险因素。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Oct 1;95(1139):20220022. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220022. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the prevention and management of postoperative bleeding complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: Current strategies and future directions precise.胰十二指肠切除术后出血并发症预防与管理的进展:当前策略与未来方向精准。
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 24;16(8):108928. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.108928.
2
Prognostic significance of preoperative abdominal fat thickness for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.术前腹部脂肪厚度对胰腺导管腺癌的预后意义
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jun 20;16(1):1163. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02987-1.
3
Comparison of pancreaticojejunostomy under the theory of mucosal priority healing with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-centre case-control study.胰十二指肠切除术后基于黏膜优先愈合理论的胰肠吻合术与导管对黏膜吻合术及套入式胰肠吻合术的比较:一项单中心病例对照研究
Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251345016. doi: 10.1177/00368504251345016. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Arterial Resections in Pancreatic Cancer-An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胰腺癌的动脉切除术——一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 1;17(9):1540. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091540.