• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的地域差异:来自 PROGRESS-CTO 注册研究的见解。

Geographic diversity in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.

机构信息

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Sep;36(9). doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00056.

DOI:10.25270/jic/24.00056
PMID:38776473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is variability in clinical and lesion characteristics as well as techniques in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We analyzed patient and lesion characteristics, techniques, and outcomes in 11 503 CTO-PCI procedures performed in North America (NA) and in the combined regions of Europe, Asia, and Africa from 2017 to 2023 as documented in the PROGRESS-CTO registry.

RESULTS

Eight thousand four hundred seventy-nine (74%) procedures were performed in NA. Compared with non-NA patients, NA patients were older, with higher body mass index and higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of coronary artery disease, prior history of PCI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Their CTOs were more complex, with higher J-CTO (2.56 ± 1.22 vs 1.81 ± 1.24; P less than .001) and PROGRESS-CTO (1.29 ± 1.01 vs 1.07 ± 0.95; P less than .001) scores, longer length, and higher prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity, blunt/no stump, moderate to severe calcification, and proximal tortuosity. Retrograde (31.0% vs 22.1%; P less than .001) and antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) (21.2% vs 9.2%; P less than .001) were more commonly used in NA centers, along with intravascular ultrasound (69.0% vs 10.1%; P less than .001). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were longer in NA, while contrast volume and radiation dose were lower. Technical (86.7% vs 86.8%; P > .90) and procedural (85.4% vs 85.8%; P = .70) success and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (1.9% vs 1.7%; P = .40) were similar in NA and non-NA centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-NA patients, NA patients undergoing CTO PCI have more comorbidities, higher CTO lesion complexity, are more likely to undergo treatment with retrograde and ADR, and have similar technical success and MACE.

摘要

背景

慢性完全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的临床和病变特征以及技术存在差异。

方法

我们分析了 2017 年至 2023 年在北美(NA)和欧洲、亚洲和非洲联合地区的 PROGRESS-CTO 注册中心记录的 11503 例 CTO-PCI 手术中的患者和病变特征、技术和结局。

结果

8479 例(74%)手术在 NA 进行。与非 NA 患者相比,NA 患者年龄较大,体重指数较高,糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常、冠心病家族史、既往 PCI 史、冠状动脉旁路移植术和心力衰竭、脑血管疾病和外周动脉疾病的患病率较高。他们的 CTO 更复杂,J-CTO(2.56±1.22 比 1.81±1.24;P<.001)和 PROGRESS-CTO(1.29±1.01 比 1.07±0.95;P<.001)评分更高,长度更长,近端帽模糊、钝/无残端、中重度钙化和近端迂曲的发生率更高。逆行(31.0%比 22.1%;P<.001)和正向夹层和再进入(ADR)(21.2%比 9.2%;P<.001)在 NA 中心更常用,同时血管内超声(69.0%比 10.1%;P<.001)。NA 中心的手术和透视时间较长,而造影剂用量和辐射剂量较低。NA 和非 NA 中心的技术(86.7%比 86.8%;P>.90)和程序(85.4%比 85.8%;P=.70)成功率和住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(1.9%比 1.7%;P=.40)相似。

结论

与非 NA 患者相比,接受 CTO PCI 的 NA 患者合并症更多,CTO 病变更复杂,更有可能接受逆行和 ADR 治疗,技术成功率和 MACE 相似。

相似文献

1
Geographic diversity in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的地域差异:来自 PROGRESS-CTO 注册研究的见解。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Sep;36(9). doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00056.
2
Impact of proximal cap ambiguity on the procedural techniques and outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.近端帽模糊性对慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗操作技术和结果的影响:来自 PROGRESS-CTO 登记研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):737-746. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30580. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
3
Impact of Proximal Cap Ambiguity on Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Multicenter US Registry.近端帽模糊对慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响:来自美国多中心注册研究的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Oct;28(10):391-396.
4
Balloon-assisted subintimal entry (BASE) in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions.球囊辅助的次内膜下入路(BASE)在慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(5):834-843. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30830. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Retrograde Versus Antegrade Approach for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion in an Algorithm-Driven Contemporary Asia-Pacific Multicentre Registry: Comparison of Outcomes.基于算法的当代亚太多中心注册研究中逆行与顺行入路治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞的对比:结局比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jun;29(6):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.188. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
Frequency and Outcomes of Ad Hoc Versus Planned Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Multicenter Experience.临时与计划性慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的频率及结果:多中心经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 May;31(5):133-139. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
7
Antegrade dissection and re-entry versus parallel wiring in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.正向夹层与平行导丝技术在慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的对比:来自 PROGRESS-CTO 注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):723-729. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30346. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
Procedural failure of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a multicenter US registry.慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术失败:来自美国多中心注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;85(7):1115-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25807. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
Coronary artery spatial distribution of chronic total occlusions: Insights from a large US registry.慢性完全闭塞病变的冠状动脉空间分布:来自美国一项大型注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):23-30. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26844. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
A Systematic Review of Periprocedural Risk Prediction Scores in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期风险预测评分的系统评价
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 15;193:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.044. Epub 2023 Mar 9.