Maqsood Muhammad Haisum, Zhang Robert S, Zlotnick David M, Parikh Sahil A, Bangalore Sripal
Department of Cardiology, DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 May 21;36(9). doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00089.
Clot-in-transit (CIT) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) has been associated with a high mortality rate and poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pooled efficacy of each of the 4 interventions (anticoagulation [AC] alone, systemic thrombolytic [ST] therapy, surgical thrombectomy, and catheter-based thrombectomy [CBT]) using mortality as the primary outcome.
A time limited search until March 28, 2024 was conducted using PubMed (National Institutes of Health) and EMBASE (Elsevier) databases.
Thirteen studies (6 retrospective, 4 non-randomized prospective, and 3 pooled studies of case-reports) were included in the calculation of weighted proportion of mortality, including a total of 492 patients with CIT and PE with a mean age of 60.6 years; 50.1% were males. ST was the most frequently used treatment intervention (38.2%), followed by surgical thrombectomy (33.8%), AC alone (22.6%), and CBT (5.9%). The unweighted mortality was highest with AC alone 32.4% (36/111), followed by surgical thrombectomy 23.2% (38/164), CBT 20.7% (6/29), and ST 13.8% (26/188). The weighted mortality for AC alone was 35% (95% CI, 21% to 49%; 12 studies), surgical thrombectomy was 31% (95% CI, 16% to 47%; 12 studies), CBT was 20% (95% CI, 6% to 34%; 3 studies), and ST was 12% (95% CI, 5% to 19%; 12 studies).
In this meta-analysis of patients with CIT and PE, the highest mortality was observed with AC alone, followed by surgical thrombectomy, CBT, and ST therapy. However, there remains a need for randomized clinical trial data to determine the best treatment.
肺栓塞(PE)患者的移行性血栓(CIT)与高死亡率和不良预后相关。本研究的目的是以死亡率作为主要结局,评估4种干预措施(单纯抗凝[AC]、全身溶栓[ST]治疗、手术取栓和导管介入取栓[CBT])各自的综合疗效。
利用美国国立医学图书馆的PubMed数据库和爱思唯尔的EMBASE数据库进行了截至2024年3月28日的限时检索。
13项研究(6项回顾性研究、4项非随机前瞻性研究和3项病例报告汇总研究)纳入了死亡率加权比例的计算,共纳入492例CIT和PE患者,平均年龄60.6岁;男性占50.1%。ST是最常用的治疗干预措施(38.2%),其次是手术取栓(33.8%)、单纯AC(22.6%)和CBT(5.9%)。单纯AC的未加权死亡率最高,为32.4%(36/111),其次是手术取栓23.2%(38/164)、CBT 20.7%(6/29)和ST 13.8%(26/188)。单纯AC的加权死亡率为35%(95%CI,21%至49%;12项研究),手术取栓为31%(95%CI,16%至47%;12项研究),CBT为20%(95%CI,6%至34%;3项研究),ST为12%(95%CI,5%至19%;12项研究)。
在这项针对CIT和PE患者的荟萃分析中,单纯AC的死亡率最高,其次是手术取栓、CBT和ST治疗。然而,仍需要随机临床试验数据来确定最佳治疗方案。