• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿头围与母体中骨盆横向距离比值作为难产的关键解剖预测指标:回顾性病例对照研究。

Neonatal head circumference to maternal mid-transverse pelvic distance ratio as a key anatomical predictor for dystocia: Retrospective case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Aug;50(8):1383-1391. doi: 10.1111/jog.15974. Epub 2024 May 22.

DOI:10.1111/jog.15974
PMID:38777330
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine maternal and neonatal factors in cesarean deliveries due to dystocia, including cephalopelvic disproportion, latent-phase prolongation, and fetal malposition or malpresentation. Additionally, we sought to compare the differences between the dystocia subgroups.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This retrospective case-control study included women who delivered between January 2010 and June 2021 after 37 weeks of pregnancy and underwent abdominal-pelvic CT scans within 5 years before and after delivery. Neonatal factors were extracted from medical charts immediately after delivery.

RESULTS

Among the 292 women studied, those with cesarean deliveries for dystocia were older (mean ± SD, 34.2 ± 4.27 vs. 32.2 ± 3.8, p-value = 0.002), had higher pre-pregnancy BMI (22.7 ± 3.67 vs. 21.4 ± 3.48, p-value = 0.012) and term-BMI (27.4 ± 3.72 vs. 25.9 ± 3.66, p-value = 0.010), shorter interspinous distance (ISD, the distance between ischial spine) (10.8 ± 0.76 vs. 11.2 ± 0.85 cm, p-value = 0.003), and longer head circumference (HC) (35 ± 1.47 vs. 34.4 ± 1.36 cm, p-value = 0.003) compared to those who had vaginal deliveries. Univariate logistic regression for dystocia revealed associations between HC/maternal height and HC/ISD ratios (OR, 2.02 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.4 ~ 2.92], 12.13 [3.2 ~ 46.04], respectively). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that maternal age, ISD, and HC were significant factors for dystocia (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.01 ~ 1.21], 0.49 [0.26 ~ 0.91], 1.53 [1.07 ~ 2.19], respectively). The subgroup with latent-phase prolongation exhibited the lowest birthweight/term-BMI ratio (124 ± 18.8 vs. 113 ± 10.3 vs. 134 ± 19.1, p-value = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The HC/ISD ratio emerged as a crucial predictor of dystocia, suggesting that reducing term-BMI could potentially mitigate latent-phase prolongation. Further research assessing the maternal mid-pelvis during pregnancy and labor is warranted, along with efforts to reduce BMI during pregnancy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨因难产而行剖宫产的产妇和新生儿因素,包括头盆不称、潜伏期延长、胎儿位置不正或胎方位不正。此外,我们还比较了难产亚组之间的差异。

方法和材料

这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间妊娠 37 周后分娩的女性,以及在分娩前 5 年内和分娩后立即从病历中提取新生儿因素。

结果

在 292 名研究对象中,因难产而行剖宫产的产妇年龄更大(均值±标准差,34.2±4.27 岁 vs. 32.2±3.8 岁,p 值=0.002),孕前 BMI 更高(22.7±3.67 千克/平方米 vs. 21.4±3.48 千克/平方米,p 值=0.012)和足月 BMI 更高(27.4±3.72 千克/平方米 vs. 25.9±3.66 千克/平方米,p 值=0.010),坐骨棘间距离(ISD,坐骨棘之间的距离)更短(10.8±0.76 厘米 vs. 11.2±0.85 厘米,p 值=0.003),头围(HC)更大(35±1.47 厘米 vs. 34.4±1.36 厘米,p 值=0.003)。难产的单因素 logistic 回归分析显示,HC/母体身高比和 HC/ISD 比与难产有关(OR,2.02[95%置信区间,CI,1.42.92],12.13[3.246.04])。多因素 logistic 分析表明,产妇年龄、ISD 和 HC 是难产的显著因素(OR,1.11[95%CI,1.011.21],0.49[0.260.91],1.53[1.07~2.19])。潜伏期延长亚组的出生体重/足月 BMI 比值最低(124±18.8 克/千克 vs. 113±10.3 克/千克 vs. 134±19.1 克/千克,p 值=0.013)。

结论

HC/ISD 比值是难产的一个重要预测指标,表明降低足月 BMI 可能有助于减轻潜伏期延长。有必要进一步评估妊娠和分娩期间产妇中骨盆的情况,并努力降低孕期 BMI。

相似文献

1
Neonatal head circumference to maternal mid-transverse pelvic distance ratio as a key anatomical predictor for dystocia: Retrospective case-control study.新生儿头围与母体中骨盆横向距离比值作为难产的关键解剖预测指标:回顾性病例对照研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Aug;50(8):1383-1391. doi: 10.1111/jog.15974. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
The Relation between Head Circumference and Mid-Pelvic Circumference: A Simple Index for Cephalopelvic Disproportion Evaluation.头围与中骨盆周长的关系:一种简单的头盆不称评估指数。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(11-12):840-848. doi: 10.1159/000521115. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
The diagnostic accuracy of pelvic measurements: threshold values and fetal size.骨盆测量的诊断准确性:阈值与胎儿大小
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Oct;290(4):643-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3271-z. Epub 2014 May 11.
4
Do neonatal birth weight thresholds for labor dystocia outcomes differ between short and normal stature women?产程难产结局的新生儿出生体重阈值在矮身材和正常身材女性之间是否存在差异?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;166(3):1023-1030. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15139. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Role of fetal head-circumference-to-maternal-height ratio in predicting Cesarean section for labor dystocia: prospective multicenter study.胎儿头围与产妇身高比预测难产剖宫产的作用:前瞻性多中心研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;61(1):93-98. doi: 10.1002/uog.24981.
6
Predicting mid-pelvic interspinous distance in women using height and pubic arch angle.基于身高和耻骨弓角度预测女性中骨盆棘间距离。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289814. eCollection 2023.
7
Fetal head circumference and subpubic angle are independent risk factors for unplanned cesarean and operative delivery.胎儿头围和耻骨下角是计划外剖宫产和手术分娩的独立危险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Aug;96(8):1006-1011. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13162. Epub 2017 May 30.
8
Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia.磁共振成像骨盆测量作为评估难产的诊断工具。
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;89(6):902-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00148-8.
9
The sonographic measurement of the ratio between the fetal head circumference and the obstetrical conjugate is accurate in predicting the risk of labor arrest: results from a multicenter prospective study.超声测量胎儿头围与产科入口比例在预测分娩阻滞风险方面准确:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100710. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100710. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
10
A large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight.与高出生体重相比,头围较大与计划外剖宫产或器械助产以及新生儿并发症的关联更为密切。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;213(6):833.e1-833.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.045. Epub 2015 Aug 5.