• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估骶管硬膜外类固醇注射作为辅助手段在慢性尾骨痛中辅助阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗的有效性。

Evaluation of the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injection as an adjuvant to ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic coccygodynia.

作者信息

Gazioğlu Türkyılmaz Gülçin, Rumeli Şebnem

机构信息

Pain Clinic, Ministry of Health Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31161. eCollection 2024 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31161
PMID:38778976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11109874/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adding caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) to ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency (GI-PRF) therapy in patients with refractory chronic coccygodynia, and to determine the effect of pain duration and trauma on treatment success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients who underwent GI-PRF (n = 20) or GI-PRF + CESI (n = 20) were retrospectively assessed for age, gender, pain duration, history of trauma to the coccyx, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores pre-procedure and 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure and satisfaction rates at 6 months post-procedure. Satisfaction was categorized as excellent, high, moderate, and low.

RESULTS

In both groups, NRS scores were significantly decreased at 6 months (pre-vs. 6 mo. post-procedure: GI-PRF [8 vs. 5], GI-PRF + CESI [8.5 vs. 3.5]; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients reporting excellent satisfaction was significantly higher in the GI PRF + CESI group (50 % vs. 15 %; p < 0.05). Patients with trauma history in the GI-PRF + CESI group had significantly lower median NRS values at 6 months compared to patients in both groups with negative trauma history (p < 0.02). Within the GI-PRF only group, patients with trauma history had significantly lower NRS scores at 6 months than those without a history of trauma (p = 0.012). Pain duration did not significantly impact satisfaction levels (p = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

GI-PRF therapy was effective in coccygodynia, especially in patients with positive trauma history, and adjuvant CESI increased patient satisfaction by providing better pain control.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在难治性慢性尾骨痛患者中,在阴部神经节脉冲射频(GI-PRF)治疗基础上加用骶管硬膜外类固醇注射(CESI)的有效性,并确定疼痛持续时间和创伤对治疗成功的影响。

材料与方法

对40例行GI-PRF(n = 20)或GI-PRF + CESI(n = 20)治疗的患者进行回顾性评估,内容包括年龄、性别、疼痛持续时间、尾骨创伤史、术前及术后1、3和6个月的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分以及术后6个月的满意率。满意率分为优、高、中、低四个等级。

结果

两组患者术后6个月时NRS评分均显著降低(术前与术后6个月比较:GI-PRF组[8 vs. 5],GI-PRF + CESI组[8.5 vs. 3.5];p < 0.001)。GI-PRF + CESI组报告优级满意率的患者比例显著更高(50% vs. 15%;p < 0.05)。与两组创伤史阴性的患者相比,GI-PRF + CESI组有创伤史的患者术后6个月时的NRS中位数显著更低(p < 0.02)。仅在GI-PRF组中,有创伤史的患者术后6个月时的NRS评分显著低于无创伤史的患者(p = 0.012)。疼痛持续时间对满意率无显著影响(p = 0.055)。

结论

GI-PRF治疗对尾骨痛有效,尤其是对有创伤史阳性的患者,辅助性CESI通过更好地控制疼痛提高了患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5784/11109874/b0a8644287e9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5784/11109874/3a45b61da5c5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5784/11109874/b0a8644287e9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5784/11109874/3a45b61da5c5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5784/11109874/b0a8644287e9/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injection as an adjuvant to ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic coccygodynia.评估骶管硬膜外类固醇注射作为辅助手段在慢性尾骨痛中辅助阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗的有效性。
Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31161. eCollection 2024 May 30.
2
Comparison of block and pulsed radiofrequency of the ganglion impar in coccygodynia.比较奇神经节阻滞与脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 24;49(5):1555-1559. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-51.
3
Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Underwent Ganglion Impar Pulsed Radiofrequency due to Coccydynia.因尾骨痛接受阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗患者的回顾性评估
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Sep 22;56(3):386-390. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.14396. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study.阴部神经节阻滞与骶管硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性尾骨痛患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Korean J Pain. 2022 Jan 1;35(1):106-113. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106.
5
A Review of Current Treatment Options for Coccygodynia.《尾痛症的当前治疗选择综述》。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Mar 19;22(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0683-7.
6
The Effect of Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment on Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Refractory to Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment.双极脉冲射频治疗对经单极脉冲射频治疗无效的慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的疗效。
Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):E97-E103.
7
Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial.超声引导下颈神经根脉冲射频治疗颈神经根性疼痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2023 May;23(5):651-655. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
8
Pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of coccygodynia.脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛
Agri. 2011 Jan;23(1):1-6. doi: 10.5505/agri.2011.59002.
9
Coccygodynia treated by pulsed radio frequency treatment to the Ganglion of Impar: a case series.经阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛:病例系列
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(3):349-54. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140454.
10
Factors associated with treatment success after combined transforaminal epidural steroid injection and dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain.经皮椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射联合背根神经节脉冲射频治疗慢性腰椎根性疼痛患者的治疗成功相关因素。
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;52(4):1241-1248. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5429. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Coccydynia: anatomic origin and considerations regarding the effectiveness of injections for pain management.尾骨痛:解剖学起源及关于注射治疗疼痛管理有效性的考量
Korean J Pain. 2023 Jul 1;36(3):272-280. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23175.
2
Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Underwent Ganglion Impar Pulsed Radiofrequency due to Coccydynia.因尾骨痛接受阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗患者的回顾性评估
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Sep 22;56(3):386-390. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.14396. eCollection 2022.
3
A retrospective study on the pathologies in patients with coccydynia-lumbosacralgia and their treatment.
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):688-691. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.078. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
4
Predictive factors affecting treatment success in ganglion impar block applied in chronic coccygodynia.影响慢性尾骨痛中应用奇神经节阻滞治疗成功的预测因素。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun 23. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103582.
5
Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study.阴部神经节阻滞与骶管硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性尾骨痛患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Korean J Pain. 2022 Jan 1;35(1):106-113. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106.
6
Association of coccygodynia with pelvic floor symptoms in women with pelvic pain.女性盆腔疼痛患者尾骨痛与盆底症状的相关性。
PM R. 2022 Nov;14(11):1351-1359. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12706. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
The interdisciplinary management of coccydynia: A narrative review.尾骨痛的多学科管理:一项叙述性综述。
PM R. 2022 Sep;14(9):1143-1154. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12683. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Comparative evaluation of transsacrococcygeal and transcoccygeal approach of ganglion impar block for management of coccygodynia.经骶尾和经尾骨神经节阻滞治疗尾骨痛的比较评估
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):90-96. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_588_20. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
9
Comparison of block and pulsed radiofrequency of the ganglion impar in coccygodynia.比较奇神经节阻滞与脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 24;49(5):1555-1559. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-51.
10
The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency of Genicular Nerves in the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Severe Degenerative Disease or Previous Total Knee Arthroplasty.超声引导下膝关节神经脉冲射频治疗严重退行性疾病或既往全膝关节置换术后慢性膝关节疼痛的疗效。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Mar 12;25:1857-1863. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915359.