Gazioğlu Türkyılmaz Gülçin, Rumeli Şebnem
Pain Clinic, Ministry of Health Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31161. eCollection 2024 May 30.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adding caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) to ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency (GI-PRF) therapy in patients with refractory chronic coccygodynia, and to determine the effect of pain duration and trauma on treatment success.
Forty patients who underwent GI-PRF (n = 20) or GI-PRF + CESI (n = 20) were retrospectively assessed for age, gender, pain duration, history of trauma to the coccyx, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores pre-procedure and 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure and satisfaction rates at 6 months post-procedure. Satisfaction was categorized as excellent, high, moderate, and low.
In both groups, NRS scores were significantly decreased at 6 months (pre-vs. 6 mo. post-procedure: GI-PRF [8 vs. 5], GI-PRF + CESI [8.5 vs. 3.5]; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients reporting excellent satisfaction was significantly higher in the GI PRF + CESI group (50 % vs. 15 %; p < 0.05). Patients with trauma history in the GI-PRF + CESI group had significantly lower median NRS values at 6 months compared to patients in both groups with negative trauma history (p < 0.02). Within the GI-PRF only group, patients with trauma history had significantly lower NRS scores at 6 months than those without a history of trauma (p = 0.012). Pain duration did not significantly impact satisfaction levels (p = 0.055).
GI-PRF therapy was effective in coccygodynia, especially in patients with positive trauma history, and adjuvant CESI increased patient satisfaction by providing better pain control.
本研究旨在评估在难治性慢性尾骨痛患者中,在阴部神经节脉冲射频(GI-PRF)治疗基础上加用骶管硬膜外类固醇注射(CESI)的有效性,并确定疼痛持续时间和创伤对治疗成功的影响。
对40例行GI-PRF(n = 20)或GI-PRF + CESI(n = 20)治疗的患者进行回顾性评估,内容包括年龄、性别、疼痛持续时间、尾骨创伤史、术前及术后1、3和6个月的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分以及术后6个月的满意率。满意率分为优、高、中、低四个等级。
两组患者术后6个月时NRS评分均显著降低(术前与术后6个月比较:GI-PRF组[8 vs. 5],GI-PRF + CESI组[8.5 vs. 3.5];p < 0.001)。GI-PRF + CESI组报告优级满意率的患者比例显著更高(50% vs. 15%;p < 0.05)。与两组创伤史阴性的患者相比,GI-PRF + CESI组有创伤史的患者术后6个月时的NRS中位数显著更低(p < 0.02)。仅在GI-PRF组中,有创伤史的患者术后6个月时的NRS评分显著低于无创伤史的患者(p = 0.012)。疼痛持续时间对满意率无显著影响(p = 0.055)。
GI-PRF治疗对尾骨痛有效,尤其是对有创伤史阳性的患者,辅助性CESI通过更好地控制疼痛提高了患者满意度。