• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴部神经节阻滞与骶管硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性尾骨痛患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study.

作者信息

Sencan Savas, Yolcu Gunay, Bilim Serhad, Kenis-Coskun Ozge, Gunduz Osman Hakan

机构信息

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2022 Jan 1;35(1):106-113. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106.

DOI:10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106
PMID:34966017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8728552/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coccygodynia is one of the chronic, refractory painful musculoskeletal disorders. Interventional procedures are applied to patients unresponsive to initial treatment in coccygodynia. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of ganglion impar block (GIB) and caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) in patients with chronic coccygodynia.

METHODS

This study was a prospective randomized comparison study conducted between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients diagnosed with chronic coccygodynia were randomly divided into two groups: the GIB group and the CESI group. The severity of pain, presence of neuropathic pain, and quality of life were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale, Leeds Assessment of the Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Scale, and Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients in each group were included in the final analyses. While there was a significant decrease in pain intensity in both groups in the 3-month follow-up, this decrease was more significant in the GIB group at the 3rd week. There was a significant improvement in the SF-12 physical score and the number of patients with neuropathic pain in both groups in the 3rd week, but this improvement was not observed in the 3rd month.

CONCLUSIONS

Although GIB may provide more pain relief in short term, both GIB and CESI are useful treatment methods in coccygodynia unresponsive to more conservative treatments.

摘要

背景

尾骨痛是一种慢性、难治性的肌肉骨骼疼痛疾病。对于尾骨痛初始治疗无反应的患者,会采用介入治疗方法。本研究旨在比较阴部神经节阻滞(GIB)和骶管硬膜外类固醇注射(CESI)对慢性尾骨痛患者的治疗效果。

方法

本研究是一项于2019年6月至2021年1月进行的前瞻性随机对照研究。被诊断为慢性尾骨痛的患者被随机分为两组:GIB组和CESI组。分别使用数字评定量表、利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估量表以及简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)评估疼痛严重程度、神经病理性疼痛的存在情况和生活质量。

结果

每组各有34例患者纳入最终分析。在3个月的随访中,两组的疼痛强度均显著降低,但在第3周时,GIB组的疼痛强度降低更为显著。在第3周时,两组的SF - 12身体评分和神经病理性疼痛患者数量均有显著改善,但在第3个月时未观察到这种改善。

结论

尽管GIB在短期内可能提供更多的疼痛缓解,但对于对更保守治疗无反应的尾骨痛患者,GIB和CESI都是有效的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/c8008abefae7/kjp-35-1-106-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/85f171375680/kjp-35-1-106-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/7365e3e61062/kjp-35-1-106-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/c8008abefae7/kjp-35-1-106-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/85f171375680/kjp-35-1-106-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/7365e3e61062/kjp-35-1-106-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5d/8728552/c8008abefae7/kjp-35-1-106-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study.阴部神经节阻滞与骶管硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性尾骨痛患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Korean J Pain. 2022 Jan 1;35(1):106-113. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106.
2
Comparison of block and pulsed radiofrequency of the ganglion impar in coccygodynia.比较奇神经节阻滞与脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 24;49(5):1555-1559. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-51.
3
The influence of coccygeal dynamic patterns on ganglion impar block treatment results in chronic coccygodynia.尾骨动态模式对慢性尾骨痛中奇神经节阻滞治疗效果的影响。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;24(5):580-585. doi: 10.1177/1591019918781673. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
Ganglion Impar block improves neuropathic pain in coccygodynia: A preliminary report.奇神经节阻滞改善尾骨痛的神经性疼痛:初步报告。
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):612-617. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Follow-up of at least 3 years after ganglion impar block for control of chronic coccygodynia.对慢性尾骨痛行脊神经节后干阻滞治疗后至少随访 3 年。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2023 Sep;40(3):97-102. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2186391. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
A Review of Current Treatment Options for Coccygodynia.《尾痛症的当前治疗选择综述》。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Mar 19;22(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0683-7.
7
Evaluation of the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injection as an adjuvant to ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic coccygodynia.评估骶管硬膜外类固醇注射作为辅助手段在慢性尾骨痛中辅助阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗的有效性。
Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31161. eCollection 2024 May 30.
8
Ganglion Impar Block: A Magic Bullet to Fix Idiopathic Coccygodynia.奇神经节阻滞:治疗特发性尾骨痛的神奇疗法。
Cureus. 2023 Jan 18;15(1):e33911. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33911. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Comparative evaluation of transsacrococcygeal and transcoccygeal approach of ganglion impar block for management of coccygodynia.经骶尾和经尾骨神经节阻滞治疗尾骨痛的比较评估
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):90-96. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_588_20. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
10
Pain Relief due to Transsacrococcygeal Ganglion Impar Block in Chronic Coccygodynia: A Pilot Study.经骶尾神经节阻滞治疗慢性尾骨痛的镇痛效果:一项初步研究。
Pain Med. 2015 Jul;16(7):1278-81. doi: 10.1111/pme.12752. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic Coccygodynia and ganglion impar block: How does contrast material distribution affect treatment outcomes?慢性尾骨痛与奇神经节阻滞:造影剂分布如何影响治疗效果?
Pain Pract. 2025 Apr;25(4):e70024. doi: 10.1111/papr.70024.
2
Management of coccygodynia: talking points from a systematic review of recent clinical trials.尾骨痛的管理:近期临床试验系统评价的要点
Ann Jt. 2025 Jan 21;10:9. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-40. eCollection 2025.
3
Coccydynia Improved by Percutaneous Discectomy.经皮椎间盘切除术改善尾骨痛

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of SF-12 Health Survey.SF-12 健康调查土耳其语版的信度和效度。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Summer;33(2):108-117. doi: 10.5080/u25700.
2
Coccydynia-A comprehensive review on etiology, radiological features and management options.尾骨痛——关于病因、放射学特征及治疗选择的综合综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan;12(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Retrospective evaluation of pain in patients with coccydynia who underwent impar ganglion block.尾骨痛患者行臀间隐窝神经阻滞治疗后疼痛的回顾性评估。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 27;16(11):e74564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74564. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Coccygeal Nerve Blockade vs. Impar Ganglion Blockade in Coccydynia: A Randomised Clinical Trial.尾骨痛中尾神经阻滞与奇神经节阻滞的比较:一项随机临床试验
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69118. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69118. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
A new treatment option for chronic refractory coccygodynia: ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block.慢性难治性尾骨痛的一种新治疗选择:超声引导下骶棘肌平面阻滞。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct;77(5):570-571. doi: 10.4097/kja.24226. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injection as an adjuvant to ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic coccygodynia.评估骶管硬膜外类固醇注射作为辅助手段在慢性尾骨痛中辅助阴部神经节脉冲射频治疗的有效性。
Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31161. eCollection 2024 May 30.
7
Coccydynia: anatomic origin and considerations regarding the effectiveness of injections for pain management.尾骨痛:解剖学起源及关于注射治疗疼痛管理有效性的考量
Korean J Pain. 2023 Jul 1;36(3):272-280. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23175.
8
Fluoroscopy guided without contrast injection for ganglion impar blockade in traumatic coccydynia: Description a modified approach and 1-year results.经皮透视引导下不注射造影剂行尾骨旁神经丛阻滞治疗创伤性尾痛:改良方法描述及 1 年结果。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Mar;29(3):395-401. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.78166.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 11;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01034-6.
4
Ganglion Impar Neurolysis in the Management of Pelvic and Perineal Cancer-Related Pain.奇神经节阻滞术在盆腔和会阴癌相关疼痛管理中的应用
Case Rep Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;13(1):29-34. doi: 10.1159/000505181. eCollection 2020 Jan-Apr.
5
Comparison of block and pulsed radiofrequency of the ganglion impar in coccygodynia.比较奇神经节阻滞与脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 24;49(5):1555-1559. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-51.
6
An Unusual Complication After Ganglion Impar Block for Chronic Cancer Pain Management.用于慢性癌痛管理的奇神经节阻滞术后的一种罕见并发症。
AANA J. 2017 Dec;85(6):424-426.
7
Are steroids required in the treatment of ganglion impar blockade in chronic coccydynia? a prospective double-blinded clinical trial.慢性尾骨痛的阴部神经节阻滞治疗中是否需要使用类固醇?一项前瞻性双盲临床试验。
Korean J Pain. 2019 Oct 1;32(4):301-306. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.301.
8
A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ganglion impar block in patients with chronic perineal pain.一项评估超声引导下阴部神经节阻滞对慢性会阴痛患者疗效的前瞻性研究。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):126-130. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_667_18.
9
Ganglion Impar block improves neuropathic pain in coccygodynia: A preliminary report.奇神经节阻滞改善尾骨痛的神经性疼痛:初步报告。
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):612-617. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
10
Sacral Burst Neuromodulation via Caudal Approach as a Treatment for Chronic Coccydynia.
Neuromodulation. 2019 Dec;22(8):992-994. doi: 10.1111/ner.12808. Epub 2018 Aug 17.