• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村宅基地退出模式与农户福利需求类型的双边匹配决策:基于土地空间规划管制背景下的中国证据

Bilateral matching decision-making for rural homesteads withdrawal patterns and types of peasant households' welfare needs: Evidence from China in the context of land spatial planning regulation.

作者信息

Zhu Di, Wang Yinghong, Niu Qian, Wu Zebin, Wu Lijun

机构信息

School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China.

School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 May 1;10(10):e30587. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30587. eCollection 2024 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30587
PMID:38778979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11109725/
Abstract

In order to solve the issue of idle rural homesteads and enhance the welfare of peasant households, the Chinese government has implemented various rural homestead withdrawal patterns. In the context of land spatial planning regulation, based on the field survey data from 210 peasant households in Xuzhou City and Ganzhou City, this study constructs a bilateral matching model between rural homestead withdrawal patterns and types of welfare needs of peasant households. This study uses a Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm improved on the 0-1 knapsack strategy to solve the matching model, aiming to find the optimal homestead withdrawal patterns that match the types of peasant households. The results show that: (1) The matching of rural homestead withdrawal patterns and types of peasant households conforms to the principle of comparative advantage. (2) In the case of "one-to-one matching" between peasant households and homestead withdrawal patterns, matching the "economic-material-oriented" peasant households with the withdrawal pattern of "monetary compensation", matching the "social-service-oriented" peasant households with withdrawal pattern of "indicator replacement", and matching the "welfare-assistance-oriented" peasant households with the withdrawal pattern of "asset replacement". (3) The bilateral overall preference of the combined rural homestead withdrawal patterns is higher than that of the single rural homestead withdrawal pattern, and satisfaction has increased by at least 8 %. The authors argue that the government should design and implement diversified withdrawal patterns based on a full understanding of the welfare needs of peasant households.

摘要

为解决农村宅基地闲置问题,提高农户福利,中国政府实施了多种农村宅基地退出模式。在土地空间规划调控背景下,基于徐州市和赣州市210户农户的实地调查数据,本研究构建了农村宅基地退出模式与农户福利需求类型的双边匹配模型。本研究采用基于0-1背包策略改进的离散粒子群优化算法求解匹配模型,旨在找到与农户类型相匹配的最优宅基地退出模式。结果表明:(1)农村宅基地退出模式与农户类型的匹配符合比较优势原则。(2)在农户与宅基地退出模式“一对一匹配”的情况下,将“经济物质导向型”农户与“货币补偿”退出模式相匹配,将“社会服务导向型”农户与“指标置换”退出模式相匹配,将“福利救助导向型”农户与“资产置换”退出模式相匹配。(3)农村宅基地组合退出模式的双边总体偏好高于单一农村宅基地退出模式,满意度至少提高了8%。作者认为,政府应在充分了解农户福利需求的基础上,设计并实施多样化的退出模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/7ca10fbdbde7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/ef15f473451e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/ca41e0e665f1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/7ca10fbdbde7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/ef15f473451e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/ca41e0e665f1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370c/11109725/7ca10fbdbde7/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Bilateral matching decision-making for rural homesteads withdrawal patterns and types of peasant households' welfare needs: Evidence from China in the context of land spatial planning regulation.农村宅基地退出模式与农户福利需求类型的双边匹配决策:基于土地空间规划管制背景下的中国证据
Heliyon. 2024 May 1;10(10):e30587. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30587. eCollection 2024 May 30.
2
Leaving the Homestead: Examining the Role of Relative Deprivation, Social Trust, and Urban Integration among Rural Farmers in China.离开家园:审视相对剥夺、社会信任与中国农村农民的城市融合度的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;19(19):12658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912658.
3
Can Land Policy Promote Farmers' Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China.土地政策能否提升农民的主观幸福感?基于晋江农村宅基地退出的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 16;19(12):7414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127414.
4
Optimizing Agricultural Input and Production for Different Types of at-Risk Peasant Households: An Empirical Study of Typical Counties in the Yimeng Mountain Area of Northern China.优化不同类型脆弱农户的农业投入和生产:以中国北方沂蒙山区典型县为例的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113938.
5
Does Institutional Social Insurance Cause the Abandonment of Cultivated Land? Evidence from Rural China.制度性社会保险会导致耕地抛荒吗?来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;19(3):1117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031117.
6
Impact and Analysis of the Renovation Program of Dilapidated Houses in China on Poor Peasant Households' Life Satisfaction: A Survey of 2617 Peasant Households in Gansu Province.中国危房改造工程对贫困农户生活满意度的影响及分析——对甘肃省 2617 户农户的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315548.
7
Farmers' Willingness to Gather Homesteads and the Influencing Factors-An Empirical Study of Different Geomorphic Areas in Chongqing.农民宅基地意愿归集及其影响因素——基于重庆市不同地貌区域的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095252.
8
Farmers' Economic Status and Satisfaction with Homestead Withdrawal Policy: Expectation and Perceived Value.农民经济地位与宅基地退出政策满意度:期望与感知价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 28;17(19):7110. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197110.
9
Moringa-based homestead to achieve Sustainable Development Goals: A case study from Jaintiapur of Sylhet, Bangladesh.基于辣木的家园实现可持续发展目标:来自孟加拉国锡尔赫特县詹蒂亚布尔的案例研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 14;10(18):e37889. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37889. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
10
The community-based rural welfare system in the People's Republic of China: 1949-1979.中华人民共和国基于社区的农村福利制度:1949 - 1979年
Community Dev J. 1982 Jan;17(1):2-12. doi: 10.1093/cdj/17.1.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Graduate students and supervisors matching decision-making considering stability-based fairness based on TOPSIS and grey correlation degrees.基于TOPSIS和灰色关联度的考虑基于稳定性公平性的研究生与导师匹配决策
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22902. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00388-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The transition characteristics and driving mechanisms of rural residential land in metropolitan areas-a case study of Tianjin, China.大都市地区农村居民点用地转型特征及驱动机制——以天津市为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):54130-54148. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26046-w. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
2
Farmers' Economic Status and Satisfaction with Homestead Withdrawal Policy: Expectation and Perceived Value.农民经济地位与宅基地退出政策满意度:期望与感知价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 28;17(19):7110. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197110.