• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化不同类型脆弱农户的农业投入和生产:以中国北方沂蒙山区典型县为例的实证研究。

Optimizing Agricultural Input and Production for Different Types of at-Risk Peasant Households: An Empirical Study of Typical Counties in the Yimeng Mountain Area of Northern China.

机构信息

College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.

School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113938.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192113938
PMID:36360817
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9656479/
Abstract

Using typical counties in the Yimeng Mountain area of northern China as an example, this paper analyzed the household and agricultural input characteristics of different types of peasant households using survey data from 262 farm households. The target minimization of the total absolute deviations (MOTAD) model was applied to determine the optimal combinations in the allocation of agricultural input factors and production for different types of at-risk peasant households to obtain the ideal agricultural income. The relevant results are twofold. (1) The agricultural input behaviors of different types of peasant households vary significantly. The highest levels of agricultural land, labor, and yield-increasing and labor-saving inputs included I part-time peasant households (), followed by full-time peasant households (), while the input levels of II part-time peasant households () and non-agricultural peasant households () with higher levels of non-agricultural employment gradually decreased. In general, an increase in peasant households' part-time employment revealed an inverted U-shaped trend in the agricultural input level, with a trajectory of > > > . (2) The current agricultural inputs and production combinations of different types of peasant households have room for improvement. It is necessary to adjust agricultural inputs and optimize production combinations to obtain target incomes. Overall, all types of peasant households must streamline labor inputs and increase capital inputs, except for , for which capital inputs should be reduced. Following optimization, economic crops gradually replace grain crops, and the optimal agricultural incomes of peasant households will be improved. The study results provide practical policy insights for reducing agricultural production risks and improving agricultural production incomes.

摘要

以中国北方沂蒙山区的典型县为例,利用 262 户农户的调查数据,采用最小总绝对离差(MOTAD)模型,分析了不同类型农户的家庭和农业投入特征。该模型旨在确定不同风险农户在农业投入要素和生产配置方面的最优组合,以获得理想的农业收入。相关结果有两点。(1)不同类型农户的农业投入行为存在显著差异。I 兼业户()的农业土地、劳动力和增产节劳投入水平最高,其次是纯农户(),而具有较高非农就业水平的 II 兼业户()和非农户()的农业投入水平逐渐降低。总体而言,农户兼业程度的提高呈现出农业投入水平的倒“U”型趋势,轨迹为 > > > 。(2)不同类型农户的当前农业投入和生产组合仍有改进空间。有必要调整农业投入,优化生产组合,以获得目标收入。总体而言,除了(),所有类型的农户都必须精简劳动力投入,增加资本投入,而()则应减少资本投入。经过优化,经济作物逐渐取代粮食作物,农户的最优农业收入将得到提高。研究结果为降低农业生产风险和提高农业生产收入提供了切实可行的政策建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/f7ed942190d1/ijerph-19-13938-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/642bebd74fa0/ijerph-19-13938-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/db15208414fb/ijerph-19-13938-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/f7ed942190d1/ijerph-19-13938-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/642bebd74fa0/ijerph-19-13938-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/db15208414fb/ijerph-19-13938-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa58/9656479/f7ed942190d1/ijerph-19-13938-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing Agricultural Input and Production for Different Types of at-Risk Peasant Households: An Empirical Study of Typical Counties in the Yimeng Mountain Area of Northern China.优化不同类型脆弱农户的农业投入和生产:以中国北方沂蒙山区典型县为例的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113938.
2
Cultivated Land Input Behavior of Different Types of Rural Households and Its Impact on Cultivated Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yimeng Mountain Area, China.不同类型农户耕地投入行为及其对耕地利用效率的影响——以沂蒙山区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14870. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214870.
3
[Peasant women and agrarian life in Latin America].[拉丁美洲的农村妇女与农业生活]
Tiers Monde (1960). 1985 Apr-Jul;26(102):325-34.
4
Present economic policies, what and why?当前的经济政策,是什么以及为何如此?
China Reconstr. 1981 Jan;30(1):4-6.
5
The economic contribution of children in peasant agriculture and the effect of education: evidence from the Philippines.菲律宾农民农业中儿童的经济贡献及教育的影响:证据分析
Pak Dev Rev. 1992 Summer;31(2):189-201.
6
[A discussion of production conditions among the peasantry].[关于农民阶层生产条件的讨论]
Estud Sociol. 1984 Jan-Apr;2(4):105-34.
7
Worker-peasant population and transfer of agricultural labour.工农人口与农业劳动力转移
Popul Res. 1985 Jul;2(3):34-40.
8
Household economy and population survey on a large agriculture-oriented county.对一个以农业为主的大县进行的家庭经济与人口调查。
Chin J Popul Sci. 1995;7(4):349-61.
9
Women, family, and work in Indonesian transmigration.印度尼西亚移民中的女性、家庭与工作
J Dev Areas. 1993 Apr;27(3):377-98.
10
Special report: an insider's view of China.特别报道:一位 insider 对中国的看法 (这里“insider”原词有误,可能是“insider's”表述有误,正确意思可能是“局内人”“知情人”等,准确译文应是“特别报道:一位知情人对中国的看法” )
Lett Ford Found. 1984 Feb 1;15(1):2-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling the influence and mechanism of agricultural inputs on rural poverty vulnerability: Evidence from China.解析农业投入对农村贫困脆弱性的影响及机制:来自中国的证据
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 26;9(12):e22851. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22851. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Cultivated Land Input Behavior of Different Types of Rural Households and Its Impact on Cultivated Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yimeng Mountain Area, China.不同类型农户耕地投入行为及其对耕地利用效率的影响——以沂蒙山区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14870. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214870.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Technological Progress and Climate Change on Food Crop Production: Evidence from Sichuan-China.技术进步和气候变化对粮食作物生产的影响:来自中国四川的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169863.
2
An impact of climate change and groundwater salinity on shadow price of water, farmers' revenue, and socioeconomic and environmental indicators in district Kohat-Pakistan.气候变化和地下水盐度对巴基斯坦科哈特地区水的影子价格、农民收入以及社会经济和环境指标的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(5):7352-7365. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16179-1. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
Evolution and Efficiency Assessment of Pesticide and Fertiliser Inputs to Cultivated Land in China.
中国耕地投入农药和化肥的演变及效率评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 4;18(7):3771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073771.
4
Climate Change, Pesticides and Health: Considering the Risks and Opportunities of Adaptation for Zimbabwean Smallholder Cotton Growers.气候变化、农药与健康:津巴布韦小农棉花种植者适应气候变化风险和机遇的考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 26;18(1):121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010121.
5
Mitigating Catastrophic Risks and Food Security Threats: Effects of Land Ownership in Southern Punjab, Pakistan.减轻灾难性风险和粮食安全威胁:巴基斯坦旁遮普南部土地所有权的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;17(24):9258. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249258.
6
Farmers' livelihood risks, livelihood assets and adaptation strategies in Rugao City, China.中国如皋市农民的生计风险、生计资产和适应策略。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110463. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110463. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Does nature of livelihood regulate the urban community's vulnerability to climate change? Guwahati city, a case study from North East India.生计性质是否会影响城市社区对气候变化的脆弱性?以印度东北部的古瓦哈蒂市为例。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109591. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109591. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Migration, remittances and smallholder decision-making: implications for land use and livelihood change in Central America.移民、汇款与小农户决策:对中美洲土地利用和生计变化的影响
Land use policy. 2014 Jan;38. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.001.