Argaw Mesele Damte
Private Health Sector Programme, P.O. Box 2372 code 1250, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Malariaworld J. 2015 Jul 31;6:10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10870388. eCollection 2015.
BACKGROUND: As many as 60-80% of people in developing countries first seek malaria treatment at private rather than public health facilities, but the technical quality of private services is questionable. Before commencing a Public Private Partnership for malaria, we wanted to assess the knowledge and practice of malaria diagnosis and treatment among healthcare providers (HCPs) working in Private Health Facilities (PHFs) in Ethiopia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2012. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected, entered and analysed using SPSS version 20. We enrolled 264 HCPs from 264 PHFs in malaria-endemic towns. RESULTS: The majority (84.5%) of the HCPs were males, 106 (40%) were nurses and 135 (51.0%) had practiced for more than seven years. The knowledge of HCPs about the malaria programme was scored (from 1-5), and the mean was 2.52 (95% CI: 2.32-2.72), with 40.5% of the HCPs scoring above the mean. The majority knew the recommended treatment following confirmed diagnosis (91.3% for , 88.6% for ). 73.1% of suspected cases were investigated for parasitological diagnosis. The malaria slide positivity rate was 37.6%; however, only 60.0% of the confirmed cases were treated for malaria. Presumptive malaria treatment was offered to about 40% of patients. The adherence rate of HCPs towards prescribing the recommended first line drugs was 44.2% for chloroquine, 47.9% for ACTs and 77.9% for quinine. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that in Ethiopia HCPs in private practices have major gaps in knowledge and practice related to malaria case management. Therefore, provision of malaria diagnosis and case management training, supportive supervision and job aids is recommended for private healthcare providers, especially for nurses and for younger healthcare professionals.
背景:在发展中国家,多达60%-80%的人首次寻求疟疾治疗时选择的是私立而非公立卫生机构,但私立服务的技术质量令人质疑。在启动疟疾公私合作伙伴关系之前,我们想评估在埃塞俄比亚私立卫生机构(PHF)工作的医疗服务提供者(HCP)对疟疾诊断和治疗的知识及实践情况。 材料与方法:2012年4月至6月开展了一项基于机构的横断面研究。收集了定量和定性数据,使用SPSS 20版进行录入和分析。我们从疟疾流行城镇的264家私立卫生机构中纳入了264名医疗服务提供者。 结果:大多数(84.5%)医疗服务提供者为男性,106名(40%)为护士,135名(51.0%)从业超过七年。对医疗服务提供者关于疟疾项目的知识进行评分(1-5分),平均分为2.52(95%可信区间:2.32-2.72),40.5%的医疗服务提供者得分高于平均分。大多数人知道确诊后推荐的治疗方法(间日疟为91.3%,恶性疟为88.6%)。73.1%的疑似病例接受了寄生虫学诊断调查。疟疾血片阳性率为37.6%;然而,只有60.0%的确诊病例接受了疟疾治疗。约40%的患者接受了推定疟疾治疗。医疗服务提供者对开具推荐一线药物的依从率为:氯喹44.2%,青蒿素类复方疗法47.9%,奎宁77.9%。 结论:研究表明,在埃塞俄比亚,私立医疗服务提供者在疟疾病例管理的知识和实践方面存在重大差距。因此,建议为私立医疗服务提供者,尤其是护士和年轻的医疗专业人员提供疟疾诊断和病例管理培训、支持性监督及工作辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
BMC Public Health. 2016-8-19
BMC Public Health. 2012-8-24
BMC Public Health. 2009-7-23
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-12
BMC Public Health. 2008-5-9