Suppr超能文献

安哥拉门诊医疗机构疟疾病例管理质量。

Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Malar J. 2009 Dec 2;8:275. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-275.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to health facilities, and improving malaria testing with microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Implementation was complicated by a policy that was sometimes ambiguous.

METHODS

Fourteen months after implementation began, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 33 outpatient facilities in Huambo Province to assess their readiness to manage malaria and the quality of malaria case-management for patients of all ages. Consultations were observed, patients were interviewed and re-examined, and HWs were interviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-three HWs and 177 consultations were evaluated, although many sampled consultations were missed. All facilities had AL in-stock and at least one HW trained to use AL and RDTs. However, anti-malarial stock-outs in the previous three months were common, clinical supervision was infrequent, and HWs had important knowledge gaps. Except for fever history, clinical assessments were often incomplete. Although testing was recommended for all patients with suspected malaria, only 30.7% of such patients were tested. Correct testing was significantly associated with caseloads < 25 patients/day (odds ratio: 18.4; p < 0.0001) and elevated patient temperature (odds ratio: 2.5 per 1 degrees C increase; p = 0.007). Testing was more common among AL-trained HWs, but the association was borderline significant (p = 0.072). When the malaria test was negative, HWs often diagnosed patients with malaria (57.8%) and prescribed anti-malarials (60.0%). Sixty-six percent of malaria-related diagnoses were correct, 20.1% were minor errors, and 13.9% were major (potentially life-threatening) errors. Only 49.0% of malaria treatments were correct, 5.4% were minor errors, and 45.6% were major errors. HWs almost always dosed AL correctly and gave accurate dosing instructions to patients; however, other aspects of counseling needed improvement.

CONCLUSION

By late-2007, substantial progress had been made to implement the malaria case-management policy in a setting with weak infrastructure. However, policy ambiguities, under-use of malaria testing, and distrust of negative test results led to many incorrect malaria diagnoses and treatments. In 2009, Angola published a policy that clarified many issues. As problems identified in this survey are not unique to Angola, better strategies for improving HW performance are urgently needed.

摘要

背景

安哥拉的疟疾病例管理政策建议使用青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹(AL)进行治疗。2006 年,青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹在万博省开始实施,其中包括培训卫生工作者(HWs)、监督、向卫生机构提供 AL 以及通过显微镜检查和快速诊断测试(RDT)改善疟疾检测。实施过程受到政策有时不明确的影响。

方法

在实施开始后 14 个月,在万博省的 33 个门诊设施中进行了横断面调查,以评估其管理疟疾的准备情况以及所有年龄段患者的疟疾病例管理质量。观察了咨询情况,对患者进行了访谈和重新检查,并对卫生工作者进行了访谈。

结果

评估了 93 名卫生工作者和 177 次咨询,但许多抽样咨询都错过了。所有设施均有库存的 AL,至少有一名卫生工作者接受过使用 AL 和 RDT 的培训。然而,过去三个月中经常出现抗疟药物缺货的情况,临床监督很少,卫生工作者存在重要的知识差距。除了发热病史外,临床评估往往不完整。尽管建议对所有疑似疟疾患者进行检测,但仅对 30.7%的此类患者进行了检测。正确的检测与日就诊量<25 名患者(比值比:18.4;p<0.0001)和患者体温升高(每升高 1 摄氏度比值比:2.5;p=0.007)显著相关。在接受 AL 培训的卫生工作者中,检测更为常见,但相关性具有边缘显著性(p=0.072)。当疟疾检测呈阴性时,卫生工作者经常诊断患者患有疟疾(57.8%)并开出处方抗疟药(60.0%)。66%的疟疾相关诊断是正确的,20.1%是轻微错误,13.9%是严重(潜在危及生命)错误。只有 49.0%的疟疾治疗是正确的,5.4%是轻微错误,45.6%是严重错误。卫生工作者几乎总是正确地给 AL 用药,并向患者提供准确的用药说明;然而,其他方面的咨询需要改进。

结论

到 2007 年底,在基础设施薄弱的情况下,实施疟疾病例管理政策已取得重大进展。然而,政策不明确、疟疾检测使用率低以及对阴性检测结果的不信任导致了许多错误的疟疾诊断和治疗。2009 年,安哥拉发布了一项澄清了许多问题的政策。由于本调查中发现的问题并非安哥拉所独有,因此迫切需要更好的策略来提高卫生工作者的绩效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfb/2795764/ca1230181de0/1475-2875-8-275-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验