Faculty of Medicine, Wallace Wurth Building, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Aug;60(3):4182-4200. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16424. Epub 2024 May 23.
Peak alpha frequency (PAF), the dominant oscillatory frequency within the alpha range (8-12 Hz), is associated with cognitive function and several neurological conditions, including chronic pain. Manipulating PAF could offer valuable insight into the relationship between PAF and various functions and conditions, potentially providing new treatment avenues. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively synthesise effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on PAF speed. Relevant studies assessing PAF pre- and post-NIBS in healthy adults were identified through systematic searches of electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, The Cochrane Library) and trial registers. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was employed for assessing study quality. Quantitative analysis was conducted through pairwise meta-analysis when possible; otherwise, qualitative synthesis was performed. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020190512) and the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2yaxz/). Eleven NIBS studies were included, all with a low risk-of-bias, comprising seven transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), three repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and one transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study. Meta-analysis of active tACS conditions (eight conditions from five studies) revealed no significant effects on PAF (mean difference [MD] = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.32 to 0.08, p = 0.24). Qualitative synthesis provided no evidence that tDCS altered PAF and moderate evidence for transient increases in PAF with 10 Hz rTMS. However, it is crucial to note that small sample sizes were used, there was substantial variation in stimulation protocols, and most studies did not specifically target PAF alteration. Further studies are needed to determine NIBS's potential for modulating PAF.
峰值 alpha 频率(PAF),即 alpha 频段(8-12 Hz)内的主导振荡频率,与认知功能和几种神经状况有关,包括慢性疼痛。操纵 PAF 可以深入了解 PAF 与各种功能和状况之间的关系,为提供新的治疗途径提供潜在价值。本系统综述旨在全面综合非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)对 PAF 速度的影响。通过对电子数据库(Embase、PubMed、PsychINFO、Scopus、The Cochrane Library)和试验登记处进行系统搜索,确定了评估健康成年人接受 NIBS 前后 PAF 的相关研究。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。如果可能,通过成对荟萃分析进行定量分析;否则,进行定性综合。该综述方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020190512)和开放科学框架(https://osf.io/2yaxz/)上注册。共纳入 11 项 NIBS 研究,所有研究均具有低偏倚风险,包括 7 项经颅交流电刺激(tACS)、3 项重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和 1 项经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)研究。对活跃的 tACS 条件(五项研究中的八个条件)进行的荟萃分析显示,对 PAF 没有显著影响(平均差异 [MD]=-0.12,95%CI=-0.32 至 0.08,p=0.24)。定性综合没有证据表明 tDCS 改变了 PAF,而有中等证据表明 10 Hz rTMS 会短暂增加 PAF。然而,必须注意的是,使用的样本量较小,刺激方案存在很大差异,并且大多数研究并未专门针对 PAF 改变。需要进一步研究来确定 NIBS 调节 PAF 的潜力。