Suppr超能文献

静脉与神经周围注射地塞米松延长肌间沟臂丛阻滞镇痛作用的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析

Intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after interscalene brachial plexus block: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Department of Anaesthesia, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jul;133(1):135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.042. Epub 2024 May 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of perineural vs intravenous dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct to increase duration of analgesia could be particular to specific peripheral nerve blocks because of differences in systemic absorption depending on the injection site. Given this uncertainty, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing dexamethasone administered perineurally or intravenously combined with local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block.

METHODS

Following a search of various electronic databases, we included 11 trials (1145 patients). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia defined as the time between peripheral nerve block or onset of sensory blockade and the time to first analgesic request or initial report of pain.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, duration of analgesia, was greater in the perineural dexamethasone group, with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 122 (62-183) min, I=73%, P<0.0001. Trial sequential analysis indicated that firm evidence had been reached. The quality of evidence was downgraded to low, mainly because of moderate inconsistency and serious publication bias. No significant differences were present for any of the secondary outcomes, except for onset time of sensory and motor blockade and resting pain score at 12 h, but the magnitude of differences was not clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

There is low-quality evidence that perineural administration of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct increases duration of analgesia by an average of 2 h compared with intravenous injection for interscalene brachial plexus block. Given the limited clinical relevance of this difference, the off-label use of perineural administration, and the risk of drug crystallisation, we recommend intravenous dexamethasone administration.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO (CRD42023466147).

摘要

背景

神经周围与静脉内给予地塞米松作为局部麻醉剂辅助,以增加镇痛持续时间的效果可能因注射部位不同而导致全身吸收的差异而对特定的外周神经阻滞具有特殊性。鉴于这种不确定性,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,并进行了试验序贯分析,比较了神经周围或静脉内给予地塞米松与局部麻醉剂联合用于肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的效果。

方法

在对各种电子数据库进行搜索后,我们纳入了 11 项试验(1145 名患者)。主要结局是镇痛持续时间,定义为外周神经阻滞或感觉阻滞开始与首次镇痛请求或首次疼痛报告之间的时间。

结果

神经周围地塞米松组的主要结局,即镇痛持续时间,更长,平均差异(95%置信区间)为 122(62-183)分钟,I=73%,P<0.0001。试验序贯分析表明已经达到了确凿的证据。证据质量被降级为低,主要是因为中度不一致和严重的发表偏倚。除了感觉和运动阻滞的起始时间以及 12 小时时的静息疼痛评分外,其他次要结局均无显著差异,但差异的幅度没有临床意义。

结论

有低质量的证据表明,与静脉内注射相比,神经周围给予地塞米松作为局部麻醉剂辅助,可使肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的镇痛持续时间平均延长 2 小时。鉴于这种差异的临床相关性有限,神经周围给药的标签外使用以及药物结晶的风险,我们建议静脉内给予地塞米松。

系统评价方案

PROSPERO(CRD42023466147)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验