Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, The Affiliated Nanjing Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2889-2900. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14842. Epub 2024 May 23.
A recent guideline presented by the ESC Congress in 2022 had indicated a novel therapy targeted at pulmonary artery hypertension, known as pulmonary artery denervation (PADN), which get inspired from a laboratorial trial that could lowering the pulmonary artery pressure through the intervention on the animals. Our aim is to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PADN from six aspects with the current conventional therapies.
According to the PRISMA guidance, databases including Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, Medline, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 22 August 2023, along with a full assessment of the previous five meta-analyses. Data were extracted and curated for Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the change in the 6-min walking distance (6MWD) from baseline with a secondary outcome called change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) from baseline. The four safety outcomes included risk of clinical worsening, hospitalization, mortality and severe adverse events (SAEs). The comparison is structured on a contrast model based on 65 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PADN and the other conventional mainstream drugs. PADN had a better effect in improving 6MWD than Placebo (-77.76 m, 95% CI: -102.04 to -54.34 m), Macitentan (-65.32 m, 95% CI: -95.34 to -36.1 m), Bosentan (-64.5 m, 95% CI: -94.7 to -35.07 m), Iloprost (-62.66 m, 95% CI: -99.48 to -27.13 m), Oxygen (-62.42 m, 95% CI: -100.01 to -25.78 m), Treprostinil (-62.01 m, 95% CI: -89.04 to -35.61 m), Riociguat (-60.59 m, 95% CI: -86.11 to -35.98 m), Selexipag (-47.2 m, 95% CI: -85.61 to -10.19 m), Sildenafil (-44.92 m, 95% CI: -74.43 to -16.15 m), or Sitaxsentan (-39.53 m, 95% CI: -78.99 to -0.76 m). PADN had a better antihypertensive effect than placebo and showed statistical significant lower risks to induce clinical worsening and re-hospitalization than treprostinil, riociguat, and placebo groups. No statistically significant difference in risk of mortality and severe adverse events was observed between PADN versus the other interventions.
Compared with 16 types of conventional therapies and Placebo, PADN has advantage over nine single therapies and Placebo in improving 6MWD and appears to be better than two types of dual-drug combined therapies while with no statistical significance. PADN shows a favourable antihypertensive effect on mPAP and has a lower risk to trigger clinical worsening or hospitalization, while its risk on mortality and severe adverse events is still inconclusive.
2022 年 ESC 大会发布的最新指南提出了一种针对肺动脉高压的新型靶向治疗方法,即肺动脉去神经支配(PADN),该方法的灵感来自一项实验室试验,该试验通过对动物的干预降低肺动脉压。我们的目的是进行一项网状荟萃分析,比较 PADN 与当前六种常规治疗方法在六个方面的疗效和安全性。
根据 PRISMA 指南,从成立到 2023 年 8 月 22 日,我们在 Ovid、ClinicalTrials.gov、Medline、Embase 和 PubMed 等数据库中进行了检索,并对之前的五项荟萃分析进行了全面评估。我们提取并整理了贝叶斯网状荟萃分析的数据。主要结局是从基线开始的 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)的变化,次要结局是从基线开始的平均肺动脉压(mPAP)的变化。四项安全性结局包括临床恶化、住院、死亡和严重不良事件(SAEs)的风险。比较基于基于 65 项 PADN 和其他常规主流药物的随机对照试验(RCT)的对照模型。与安慰剂相比,PADN 在改善 6MWD 方面更有效(-77.76 m,95%CI:-102.04 至-54.34 m),Macitentan(-65.32 m,95%CI:-95.34 至-36.1 m),Bosentan(-64.5 m,95%CI:-94.7 至-35.07 m),Iloprost(-62.66 m,95%CI:-99.48 至-27.13 m),氧气(-62.42 m,95%CI:-100.01 至-25.78 m),Treprostinil(-62.01 m,95%CI:-89.04 至-35.61 m),Riociguat(-60.59 m,95%CI:-86.11 至-35.98 m),Selexipag(-47.2 m,95%CI:-85.61 至-10.19 m),Sildenafil(-44.92 m,95%CI:-74.43 至-16.15 m),或 Sitaxsentan(-39.53 m,95%CI:-78.99 至-0.76 m)。与安慰剂相比,PADN 在降压方面更有效,与 treprostinil、riociguat 和安慰剂组相比,PADN 诱导临床恶化和再住院的风险较低。与其他干预措施相比,PADN 组在死亡率和严重不良事件风险方面没有统计学差异。
与 16 种常规疗法和安慰剂相比,PADN 在改善 6MWD 方面优于九种单药疗法和安慰剂,并且似乎优于两种双联药物联合疗法,尽管差异无统计学意义。PADN 在 mPAP 方面显示出有利的降压效果,触发临床恶化或住院的风险较低,但其在死亡率和严重不良事件方面的风险仍不确定。