Suppr超能文献

透明矫治器疗法与传统固定矫治器在控制正畸移动方面的疗效比较:一项系统评价。

Efficacy of clear aligner therapy over conventional fixed appliances in controlling orthodontic movement: A systematic review.

作者信息

AlMogbel AbdulMajeed, Alshawy Ebrahim S, Alhusainy Abdulmageed

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2024 May 8;13:23. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_176_23. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current systematic review was to answer the clinical research question "Is Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT) effective in controlling the orthodontic movement?" by bringing together the most up-to-date information about the available evidence for CAT.

METHODOLOGY

On January 1, 2023, a search was conducted in PubMed, ERIC, Embase, and CINHAL for any research papers published in the previous 10 years that provided an overview of the PICO questions. Both the titles and abstracts of the selected studies were evaluated independently by two different authors, and if there was any disagreement between the two review authors, a third reviewer was brought in to settle it.

RESULTS

Among included studies, three were retrospective non-randomized and two studies were prospective randomized clinical trials. Various authors reported better outcome for fixed orthodontic appliances than for clear aligner treatment (CAT) in relation to mandibular incisor proclination. The mean objective grading system score was better for braces (17) than for CAT (12) with no clinically significant difference, while staging had a significant impact on treatment efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that clear aligners may be an effective alternative to traditional braces, but more research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal size of future prospective studies evaluating this treatment.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是通过汇总关于可摘矫治器治疗(CAT)现有证据的最新信息,回答临床研究问题“可摘矫治器治疗(CAT)在控制正畸移动方面是否有效?”

方法

2023年1月1日,在PubMed、ERIC、Embase和CINHAL中检索过去10年发表的任何提供PICO问题概述的研究论文。所选研究的标题和摘要由两位不同的作者独立评估,如果两位综述作者之间存在任何分歧,则引入第三位评审员来解决。

结果

在纳入的研究中,三项为回顾性非随机研究,两项为前瞻性随机临床试验。关于下颌切牙前倾,不同作者报告固定正畸矫治器的效果优于可摘矫治器治疗(CAT)。平均客观评分系统得分,矫治器(17分)优于可摘矫治器治疗(CAT)(12分),但无临床显著差异,而分期对治疗效果有显著影响。

结论

本研究结果表明,可摘矫治器可能是传统矫治器的有效替代方案,但需要更多研究来证实这些发现,并确定未来评估该治疗方法的前瞻性研究的最佳规模。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/290a/11114459/a1a75edc8e59/JOS-13-23-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Impact of clear aligner therapy on speech: does clear aligner therapy cause any speech difficulty?
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Mar;25(1):27-28. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-00969-w. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies.
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0695-z.
5
Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article.
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:37. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_30_23. eCollection 2023.
7
Cephalometric evaluation of changes in vertical dimension and molar position in adult non-extraction treatment with clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Sep 10;26(4):e2119360. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.e2119360.oar. eCollection 2021.
8
Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2353-2370. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04361-1. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
10
Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):881-9. doi: 10.2319/061614-436.1. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of overbite improvement in deep bite correction using clear aligner therapy.
J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:8. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_87_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficiency of clear aligners with nickel titanium wires for treating mandibular incisor crowding.
Bioinformation. 2024 Aug 31;20(8):917-920. doi: 10.6026/973206300200917. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):173-179. doi: 10.2319/032921-246.1.
3
4
Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Aug;75(6):394-401. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1324636. Epub 2017 May 13.
6
Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: a multicenter retrospective study.
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0126-0. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances.
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):447-54. doi: 10.2319/050812-378.1. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
9
Orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners.
ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:657973. doi: 10.5402/2012/657973. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
10
Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region: were the predicted tooth movements achieved?
J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Sep;73(5):365-76. doi: 10.1007/s00056-012-0097-9. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验