• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直丝弓矫治器与自锁托槽和传统托槽对上颌中切牙颊舌向倾斜控制的比较

Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets.

机构信息

Unit of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy.

Orthodontics Unit, Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 29;2018:9341821. doi: 10.1155/2018/9341821. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/9341821
PMID:30627583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6304479/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incisors in patients treated with three different orthodontic techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conventional brackets (Victory, 3M), self-ligating appliances (Damon Q, Ormco), and aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology) were tested. Cephalometric data of 25 patients with similar skeletal and dental pretreatment parameters were collected for each technique. Position changes of upper central incisors were assessed with radiographic evaluation before and after therapy. Three different parameters were considered: 11SnaSnp, 11Ocl and I+ TVL. All variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment and their variation over treatment was assessed.

RESULTS

When evaluating angular measurements, 11SnaSnp and 11Ocl angles showed the highest numeric variation with conventional brackets. Lowest values were reported with aligners. However, the differences among various techniques were not significant for both angles (P>0.05). Also I+ TVL linear value variation did not show significant differences among the different groups tested (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conventional multibrackets appliance showed the highest incisal position variations over treatment, but the differences among various groups were not significantly different.

摘要

目的

上颌切牙转矩表达对于正畸治疗的准确性至关重要。各种正畸装置据称具有不同的倾斜控制能力。本回顾性研究的目的是比较三种不同正畸技术治疗的患者上颌切牙的放射影像学颊舌倾斜度。

材料与方法

测试了传统托槽(Victory,3M)、自锁矫治器(Damon Q,Ormco)和隐形矫治器(Invisalign,Align Technology)。对于每种技术,均收集了 25 名具有相似骨骼和牙齿预处理参数的患者的头影测量数据。通过治疗前后的放射影像学评估,评估上颌中切牙位置的变化。考虑了三个不同的参数:11SnaSnp、11Ocl 和 I+ TVL。所有变量均在治疗前(T0)和治疗后(T1)进行测量,并评估其在治疗过程中的变化。

结果

在评估角度测量时,传统托槽组的 11SnaSnp 和 11Ocl 角度显示出最高的数值变化。隐形矫治器组报告的数值最低。然而,对于这两个角度,不同技术之间的差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。I+ TVL 线性值变化在不同测试组之间也没有显示出显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

传统多托槽矫治器在治疗过程中显示出最高的切牙位置变化,但不同组之间的差异没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437c/6304479/fb05aacbf659/BMRI2018-9341821.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437c/6304479/f5be774e2443/BMRI2018-9341821.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437c/6304479/fb05aacbf659/BMRI2018-9341821.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437c/6304479/f5be774e2443/BMRI2018-9341821.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437c/6304479/fb05aacbf659/BMRI2018-9341821.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets.直丝弓矫治器与自锁托槽和传统托槽对上颌中切牙颊舌向倾斜控制的比较
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 29;2018:9341821. doi: 10.1155/2018/9341821. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.使用两种预成直丝弓矫治器排齐整平阶段下颌牙弓变化的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.030.
3
Torque expression by active and passive self-ligating brackets in patients with four premolar extractions: A retrospective study.四前磨牙拔牙患者中主动和被动自锁托槽的转矩表达:一项回顾性研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Nov;23(4):509-516. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12403. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial.传统托槽与自锁托槽对上颌切牙转矩的影响:一项前瞻性临床试验
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006 Nov;9(4):193-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00375.x.
5
Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.使用自锁托槽和传统托槽进行正畸治疗导致的牙根吸收:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 May;79(3):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0133-5. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign®: A retrospective study.Damon Q 和 Invisalign® 矫正器用于上颌切牙内收治疗第一前磨牙拔除病例的效果比较:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 7;101(40):e30919. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030919.
7
A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.使用反Spee曲线镍钛弓丝对传统托槽和自锁托槽在上颌切牙处产生的力和力矩进行比较评估。
Aust Orthod J. 2010 Nov;26(2):127-33.
8
Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires.使用主动式自锁托槽结合不同弓丝时下颌牙弓的变化。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 May;21(5):566-572. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_94_17.
9
Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.自锁托槽和传统托槽的治疗时间、疗效和支抗丢失比较。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):280-5. doi: 10.2319/041912-326.1. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
10
Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描对被动自结扎托槽引起的前牙位置变化的评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Aug 1;17(8):623-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1901.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study.使用初始系列隐适美矫治器对下颌中切牙进行计划的中度至重度扭矩改变的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Angle Orthod. 2025 Jan 1;95(1):12-18. doi: 10.2319/061724-473.1.
2
Torque moments and stress analysis in two passive self-ligating brackets across different incisor inclinations: A 3-dimensional finite element study.两种被动自锁托槽在不同切牙倾斜度下的扭矩力矩和应力分析:一项三维有限元研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Sep-Oct;14(5):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Orthodontic management by functional activator treatment: a case report.功能性矫治器治疗的正畸管理:一例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2017 Dec 2;11(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13256-017-1505-y.
2
Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: A randomized, prospective trial.与 Invisalign 和传统托槽相关的不适:一项随机、前瞻性试验。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):801-808. doi: 10.2319/091416-687.1. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Efficacy of clear aligner therapy over conventional fixed appliances in controlling orthodontic movement: A systematic review.
透明矫治器疗法与传统固定矫治器在控制正畸移动方面的疗效比较:一项系统评价。
J Orthod Sci. 2024 May 8;13:23. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_176_23. eCollection 2024.
4
Treatment Efficiency of Maxillary and Mandibular Orovestibular Tooth Expansion and Compression Movements with the Invisalign System in Adolescents and Adults.Invisalign系统对上颌和下颌口腔前庭牙齿开展扩弓和缩弓移动在青少年及成人中的治疗效果
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1267. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051267.
5
[Comparison of the outcome of orthodontic dental movement using aligners versus fixed orthodontics: a review].[使用隐形矫治器与固定正畸进行正畸牙齿移动的效果比较:一项综述]
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2023 Jun 29;11(2):e154. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1102-2023-154. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
6
An evaluation of the Invisalign® Aligner Technique and consideration of the force system: a systematic review.隐适美矫治器技术评估及力系统考量:一项系统评价
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 27;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02437-5.
7
Comparison of Pain Levels on Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment with 2 Different Self-Ligating Bracket Systems.两种不同自锁托槽系统用于固定正畸治疗的患者疼痛程度比较。
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Dec 29;36(4):239-247. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.128.
8
Proficiency of Clear Aligner Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.透明矫治器疗法的熟练程度:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 11;15(9):e45072. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45072. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Effects of different designs of orthodontic clear aligners on the maxillary central incisors in the tooth extraction cases: a biomechanical study.不同设计的正畸透明牙套对上颌中切牙在拔牙病例中的影响:一项生物力学研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03106-8.
10
Efficacy of upper-incisor torque control with clear aligners: a retrospective study using cone-beam computed tomography.使用透明牙套控制上前牙转矩的疗效:一项基于锥形束 CT 的回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3863-3873. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05006-1. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
透明矫治器的效率、有效性及治疗稳定性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):127-133. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12177. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association?鞍结节桥连与牙齿异常:二者是否存在关联?
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Nov;27(6):568-573. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12301. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.自锁正畸托槽与传统结扎托槽中的扭矩表达:一项系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jan 1;9(1):e123-e128. doi: 10.4317/jced.53187. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
Orthodontic aligners and root resorption: A systematic review.正畸矫治器与牙根吸收:一项系统评价
Int Orthod. 2017 Mar;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners.一项比较固定唇侧矫治器和透明矫治器导致下颌切牙前倾情况的随机临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):706-12. doi: 10.2319/101415-686.1.
8
The effect of buccal-lingual slot dimension size on third-order torque response.颊舌向槽沟尺寸对三阶扭矩反应的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Apr 1;39(2):209-214. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw043.
9
Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.不同托槽-弓丝组合下弓丝直径对牙齿排齐的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.026.
10
Comparative study of torque expression among active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets.主动和被动自锁托槽与传统托槽扭矩表达的对比研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):68-74. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.068-074.oar.