Miley Emilie N, Pickering Michael A, Cheatham Scott W, Larkins Lindsay W, Cady Adam C, Baker Russell T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(10):1024. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101024.
The Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) was developed as a short-form survey to measure progress after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the longitudinal validity of the scale structure pertaining to the modified five-item HOOS-JR has not been assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural validity, longitudinal invariance properties, and latent growth curve (LGC) modeling of the modified five-item HOOS-JR in a large multi-site sample of patients who underwent a THA. A longitudinal study was conducted using data from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) database. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to assess the structural validity and longitudinal invariance across five time points. Additionally, LGC modeling was performed to assess the heterogeneity of the recovery patterns for different subgroups of patients. The resulting CFAs met most of the goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.964-0.982; IFI = 0.965-0.986; SRMR = 0.021-0.035). Longitudinal analysis did not meet full invariance, exceeding the scalar invariance model (CFI = 0.012; χ test = 702.67). Partial invariance requirements were met upon release of the intercept constraint associated with item five (CFI test = 0.010; χ = 1073.83). The equal means model did not pass the recommended goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.133; χ = 3962.49). Scores significantly changed over time, with the highest scores identified preoperatively and the lowest scores identified at 2- and 3-years postoperatively. Upon conclusion, partial scalar invariance was identified within our model. We identified that patients self-report most improvements in their scores within 6 months postoperatively. Females reported more hip disability at preoperative time points and had faster improvement as measured by the scores of the modified five-item HOOS-JR.
髋关节功能障碍与骨关节炎关节置换结局评分(HOOS-JR)是作为一种简短调查问卷开发的,用于衡量全髋关节置换术(THA)后的进展情况。然而,与改良的五项HOOS-JR相关的量表结构的纵向有效性尚未得到评估。因此,本研究的目的是在接受THA的大型多中心患者样本中评估改良的五项HOOS-JR的结构效度、纵向不变性属性和潜在增长曲线(LGC)模型。使用手术结局系统(SOS)数据库的数据进行了一项纵向研究。进行验证性因素分析(CFA)以评估五个时间点的结构效度和纵向不变性。此外,进行LGC模型以评估不同患者亚组恢复模式的异质性。所得的CFA符合大多数拟合优度指标(CFI = 0.964 - 0.982;IFI = 0.965 - 0.986;SRMR = 0.021 - 0.035)。纵向分析未达到完全不变性,超过了标量不变性模型(CFI = 0.012;χ检验 = 702.67)。在解除与项目五相关的截距约束后满足部分不变性要求(CFI检验 = 0.010;χ = 1073.83)。等均值模型未通过推荐的拟合优度指标(CFI = 0.133;χ = 3962.49)。评分随时间显著变化,术前评分最高,术后2年和3年评分最低。结论是,在我们的模型中确定了部分标量不变性。我们发现患者在术后6个月内自我报告评分改善最多。女性在术前时间点报告的髋关节残疾更多,并且根据改良的五项HOOS-JR评分,改善速度更快。