Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Aug;33(8):107771. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107771. Epub 2024 May 22.
Web-based interventions may assist in post-discharge stroke care. However, strategies for maximising uptake and engagement are needed.
To determine the: (1) effectiveness of a discharge support intervention (EnableMe web-based portal and strategies to encourage use) in improving quality of life and reducing depression (primary outcome); anxiety and unmet needs of survivors of stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA); and (2) EnableMe use and acceptability.
An open, parallel-group, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the intervention compared to usual care for survivors of stroke/TIA and their support persons. Participants recruited from eight hospitals completed questionnaires at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Outcomes included quality of life, depression, anxiety and unmet needs.
98 survivors (n=52 intervention, n=47 control) and 30 support persons (n=11 intervention, n=19 control) enrolled in the RCT. Bayesian analyses showed substantial evidence of an intervention effect on survivors' quality of life scores at 3 months. There was moderate-to-strong evidence of a treatment effect on depression scores and strong evidence that intervention participants had fewer unmet needs at 3 and 6 months. 45 % of intervention group survivors and 63 % of support persons self-reported using EnableMe. 64 % of survivors and 84 % of support persons found it helpful.
Substantial evidence for the discharge support intervention was found, with a difference between groups in survivor quality of life, depression, and unmet needs. Acceptability was demonstrated with largely positive attitudes towards EnableMe. Future research should explore different engagement strategies to improve uptake of online stroke resources.
基于网络的干预措施可能有助于脑卒中出院后的护理。然而,需要制定最大限度提高参与度的策略。
确定:(1)出院支持干预措施(EnableMe 网络门户和鼓励使用的策略)在改善生活质量和减少脑卒中及短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)幸存者的抑郁(主要结局)、焦虑和未满足需求方面的有效性;以及(2)EnableMe 的使用情况和可接受性。
一项针对脑卒中/TIA 幸存者及其照护者的开放、平行组、多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较了干预措施与常规护理。参与者从 8 家医院招募,在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时完成问卷调查。结局包括生活质量、抑郁、焦虑和未满足的需求。
98 名幸存者(n=52 例干预组,n=47 例对照组)和 30 名照护者(n=11 例干预组,n=19 例对照组)参加了 RCT。贝叶斯分析显示,干预组在 3 个月时对幸存者生活质量评分的影响有实质性证据。在抑郁评分方面有中度至强的治疗效果,在 3 个月和 6 个月时,干预组有更少的未满足需求的证据非常有力。45%的干预组幸存者和 63%的照护者自我报告使用了 EnableMe。64%的幸存者和 84%的照护者认为它有帮助。
发现出院支持干预措施有实质性证据,干预组与对照组在幸存者的生活质量、抑郁和未满足的需求方面存在差异。接受度得到了证明,对 EnableMe 的评价大多是积极的。未来的研究应探索不同的参与策略,以提高在线脑卒中资源的利用率。