Suppr超能文献

比较普通药物洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱BiOSS LIM C专用冠状动脉分叉支架的随机、多中心、开放标签、对照POLBOS 3试验:四年结果

The Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled POLBOS 3 Trial Comparing Regular Drug-Eluting Stents and the Sirolimus-Eluting BiOSS LIM C Dedicated Coronary Bifurcation Stent: Four-Year Results.

作者信息

Gil Robert J, Kern Adam, Bojko Krystian, Gziut-Rudkowska Aneta, Vassilev Dobrin, Bil Jacek

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, State Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):938. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050938.

Abstract

This multicenter, randomized study aimed to compare the sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM C dedicated coronary bifurcation stent with second-generation -limus drug-eluting stents (rDESs) in the treatment of non-left main (non-LM) coronary bifurcation. The deployment of a single stent in the main vessel-main branch across a side branch was the default strategy in all patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of major cardiovascular events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) at 48 months. We enrolled 230 patients, allocating 116 patients to the BiOSS LIM C group and 114 patients to the rDES group. Most procedures were elective (BiOSS vs. rDES: 48.3% vs. 59.6%, = 0.09) and performed in bifurcations within the left anterior descending/diagonal branch (BiOSS vs. rDES: 51.7% vs. 61.4%, = 0.15). At 48 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the BiOSS and rDES groups in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) as follows: MACEs-18.1% vs. 14.9%, HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.62-2.22, and = 0.33; cardiac death-4.3% vs. 3.5%, HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.33-4.56, and = 0.75; MI-2.6% vs. 3.5%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.17-3.23, and = 0.68; and TLR-11.2% vs. 7.9%, HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.75-3.71, and = 0.21. The implantation success rate of the BiOSS LIM C stent was very high, and the cumulative MACE rates were promising. The POLBOS 3 trial sets an important benchmark for treating non-LM coronary bifurcations (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03548272).

摘要

这项多中心随机研究旨在比较西罗莫司洗脱的BiOSS LIM C专用冠状动脉分叉支架与第二代雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架(rDES)在治疗非左主干(非LM)冠状动脉分叉中的效果。在所有患者中,默认策略是在主支血管-主分支中横跨一个侧支植入单个支架。主要终点是48个月时的主要心血管事件(心源性死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建)发生率。我们纳入了230例患者,将116例患者分配至BiOSS LIM C组,114例患者分配至rDES组。大多数手术为择期手术(BiOSS组与rDES组:48.3%对59.6%,P = 0.09),且在左前降支/对角支内的分叉处进行(BiOSS组与rDES组:51.7%对61.4%,P = 0.15)。在48个月时,BiOSS组和rDES组在主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心源性死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或靶病变血运重建(TLR)方面无统计学显著差异,具体如下:MACE发生率分别为18.1%对14.9%,风险比(HR)为1.36,95%置信区间(CI)为0.62 - 2.22,P = 0.33;心源性死亡发生率分别为4.3%对3.5%,HR为1.23,95% CI为0.33 - 4.56,P = 0.75;MI发生率分别为2.6%对3.5%,HR为0.73,95% CI为0.17 - 3.23,P = 0.68;TLR发生率分别为11.2%对7.9%,HR为1.66,95% CI为0.75 - 3.71,P = 0.21。BiOSS LIM C支架的植入成功率非常高,累积MACE发生率也很可观。POLBOS 3试验为治疗非LM冠状动脉分叉设定了一个重要基准(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03548272)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb5/11118130/d72bbc874d36/biomedicines-12-00938-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验