Abraham Meagan E, Robison Cara I, Serpa Priscila B S, Strandberg Natalia J, Erasmus Marisa A, Fraley Gregory S, Erf Gisela F, Karcher Darrin M
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2050, USA.
Department of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-2604, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 20;14(10):1513. doi: 10.3390/ani14101513.
Management choices during the pullet phase can affect behavior, welfare, and health later in life, but few studies have evaluated the pullet phase, particularly in extensive housing systems. This study was a 2 × 2 factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two strains and two stocking densities. The Lohmann LB-Lite and Lohmann LSL-Lite were housed on the floor at high-stocking density (619-670 cm/bird) and low-stocking density (1249-1352 cm/bird), which changed with age from 2 to 16 weeks of age (WOA). Bird-based measures of appearance, blood parameters, organ measurements, and production values were evaluated. Stocking density alone affected ( < 0.05) only relative bursal weight (% of body weight)-3.32% in the low-density versus 3.08% in the high-density group. High-stocking density was correlated with decreased uniformity (high-89.33 ± 0.24%; low-90.41 ± 0.24; < 0.02) and worse feather coverage in the brown strain. High-stocking density was correlated with greater uniformity (High-90.39 ± 0.24%; Low-88.47 ± 0.24%; < 0.001) and better feather coverage in the white strain. This study's feed conversion ratio (FCR) was improved by 0.07 in the low-stocking density for both strains. The remaining parameters were affected by strain and age only. Thus, while stocking density effects vary slightly depending on the strain used, cage-free pullets had limited negative effects at both the high and low-stocking densities tested in this study; there were few to no changes in the numerous bird-based welfare parameters tested.
育雏期的管理选择会影响鸡后期的行为、福利和健康,但很少有研究评估育雏期,尤其是在粗放式养殖系统中。本研究采用2×2析因随机完全区组设计(RCBD),涉及两个品系和两种饲养密度。罗曼褐LB-Lite和罗曼白LSL-Lite母鸡饲养在地面上,高饲养密度为(619 - 670平方厘米/只),低饲养密度为(1249 - 1352平方厘米/只),饲养密度随鸡龄从2周龄到16周龄变化。评估了基于鸡个体的外观、血液参数、器官测量和生产性能指标。仅饲养密度影响(P<0.05)相对法氏囊重量(占体重的百分比),低密度组为3.32%,高密度组为3.08%。高饲养密度与均匀度降低相关(高饲养密度组为89.33±0.24%;低饲养密度组为90.41±0.24%;P<0.02),且褐色品系的羽毛覆盖情况较差。高饲养密度与白色品系更好的均匀度(高饲养密度组为90.39±0.24%;低饲养密度组为88.47±0.24%;P<0.001)和更好的羽毛覆盖相关。本研究中,两种品系在低饲养密度下的饲料转化率(FCR)均提高了0.07。其余参数仅受品系和鸡龄影响。因此,虽然饲养密度的影响因所用品系略有不同,但在本研究测试的高、低饲养密度下,散养的育雏鸡产生的负面影响有限;在测试的众多基于鸡个体的福利参数中,几乎没有变化。