• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳清在墨西哥风格新鲜奶酪的生态友好型生物保鲜中的应用:21/1 无细胞上清液(CFS)的抗菌活性。

Utilization of Whey for Eco-Friendly Bio-Preservation of Mexican-Style Fresh Cheeses: Antimicrobial Activity of 21/1 Cell-Free Supernatants (CFS).

机构信息

Department Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Ex-Hacienda Santa Catarina Mártir S/N, San Andrés Cholula 72810, Puebla, Mexico.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 28;21(5):560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050560.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21050560
PMID:38791776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11121727/
Abstract

Using whey, a by-product of the cheese-making process, is important for maximizing resource efficiency and promoting sustainable practices in the food industry. Reusing whey can help minimize environmental impact and produce bio-preservatives for foods with high bacterial loads, such as Mexican-style fresh cheeses. This research aims to evaluate the antimicrobial and physicochemical effect of CFS from 21/1 produced in a conventional culture medium (MRS broth) and another medium using whey (WB medium) when applied in Mexican-style fresh cheese inoculated with several indicator bacteria (, serovar Typhimurium, , and ). The CFSs (MRS or WB) were characterized for organic acids concentration, pH, and titratable acidity. By surface spreading, CFSs were tested on indicator bacteria inoculated in fresh cheese. Microbial counts were performed on inoculated cheeses during and after seven days of storage at 4 ± 1.0 °C. Moreover, pH and color were determined in cheeses with CFS treatment. Lactic and acetic acid were identified as the primary antimicrobial metabolites produced by the 21/1 fermentation in the food application. A longer storage time (7 days) led to significant reductions ( < 0.05) in the microbial population of the indicator bacteria inoculated in the cheese when it was treated with the CFSs (MRS or WB). serovar Typhimurium was the most sensitive bacteria, decreasing 1.60 ± 0.04 log CFU/g with MRS-CFS, whereas WB-CFS reduced the microbial population of to 1.67 log CFU/g. and were the most resistant at the end of storage. The cheese's pH with CFSs (MRS or WB) showed a significant reduction ( < 0.05) after CFS treatment, while the application of WB-CFS did not show greater differences in color (ΔE) compared with MRS-CFS. This study highlights the potential of CFS from 21/1 in the WB medium as an ecological bio-preservative for Mexican-style fresh cheese, aligning with the objectives of sustainable food production and guaranteeing food safety.

摘要

利用乳清——奶酪制作过程中的一种副产物——对于提高资源效率和促进食品工业的可持续发展至关重要。再利用乳清可以帮助最小化环境影响,并为高细菌负荷的食品(如墨西哥新鲜奶酪)生产生物防腐剂。本研究旨在评估在常规培养基(MRS 肉汤)和使用乳清的另一种培养基(WB 培养基)中培养的 21/1 产生的 CFS 的抗菌和理化效果,当应用于接种了几种指示菌( 、鼠伤寒血清型 Typhimurium、 、和 )的墨西哥新鲜奶酪时。对 CFS(MRS 或 WB)的有机酸浓度、pH 值和滴定酸度进行了表征。通过表面扩散,在新鲜奶酪中接种指示菌后对 CFS 进行了测试。在 4±1.0°C 下储存 7 天期间和之后,对接种奶酪进行了微生物计数。在 CFS 处理的奶酪中测定了 pH 值和颜色。在食品应用中,21/1 发酵产生的乳酸和乙酸被鉴定为主要的抗菌代谢产物。较长的储存时间(7 天)导致接种在奶酪中的指示菌的微生物种群显著减少( < 0.05),当用 CFS(MRS 或 WB)处理时。鼠伤寒血清型 Typhimurium 是最敏感的细菌,用 MRS-CFS 减少 1.60±0.04 log CFU/g,而 WB-CFS 减少 至 1.67 log CFU/g。在储存结束时, 和 是最具抗性的。用 CFS(MRS 或 WB)处理后的奶酪 pH 值显著降低( < 0.05),而与 MRS-CFS 相比,WB-CFS 的应用在颜色(ΔE)上没有更大的差异。本研究强调了 21/1 在 WB 培养基中的 CFS 作为墨西哥新鲜奶酪生态生物防腐剂的潜力,符合可持续食品生产的目标,并保证了食品安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/8e1960064636/ijerph-21-00560-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/8c66c998b439/ijerph-21-00560-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/21980125a23f/ijerph-21-00560-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/39adfea2fc71/ijerph-21-00560-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/8e1960064636/ijerph-21-00560-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/8c66c998b439/ijerph-21-00560-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/21980125a23f/ijerph-21-00560-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/39adfea2fc71/ijerph-21-00560-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badd/11121727/8e1960064636/ijerph-21-00560-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of Whey for Eco-Friendly Bio-Preservation of Mexican-Style Fresh Cheeses: Antimicrobial Activity of 21/1 Cell-Free Supernatants (CFS).乳清在墨西哥风格新鲜奶酪的生态友好型生物保鲜中的应用:21/1 无细胞上清液(CFS)的抗菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 28;21(5):560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050560.
2
Growth of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Staphylococcus aureus on cheese during extended storage at 25°C.在25°C下长期储存期间,单核细胞增生李斯特菌、沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌O157:H7和金黄色葡萄球菌在奶酪上的生长情况。
J Food Prot. 2014 Aug;77(8):1275-88. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-047.
3
Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the growth of spoilage microorganisms and Listeria monocytogenes on fresh cheese.改性气氛包装对新鲜奶酪中腐败微生物和单核细胞增生李斯特菌生长的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):7768-7779. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14217. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Potential of cell-free supernatants from cultures of selected lactic acid bacteria and yeast obtained from local fermented foods as inhibitors of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp. and Staphylococcus aureus.从当地发酵食品中获得的特定乳酸菌和酵母培养物的无细胞上清液作为单核细胞增生李斯特菌、沙门氏菌属和金黄色葡萄球菌抑制剂的潜力。
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Sep 4;7:606. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-606.
5
Incorporation of probiotic bacteria in whey cheese: decreasing the risk of microbial contamination.在乳清干酪中添加益生菌:降低微生物污染的风险。
J Food Prot. 2011 Jul;74(7):1194-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-217.
6
Microbiological, chemical, and sensory characteristics of Swiss cheese manufactured with adjunct Lactobacillus strains using a low cooking temperature.使用辅助乳酸菌菌株并采用低温烹饪温度制作的瑞士奶酪的微生物、化学和感官特性
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Aug;91(8):2947-59. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0592.
7
Simplification of a complex microbial antilisterial consortium to evaluate the contribution of its flora in uncooked pressed cheese.简化复杂的微生物抗李斯特菌联合体,以评估其菌群在未熟压奶酪中的作用。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Feb 28;145(2-3):379-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.019. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
8
Bioactivity of probiotic whey cheese: characterization of the content of peptides and organic acids.益生菌乳清干酪的生物活性:肽和有机酸含量的特征描述。
J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Apr;93(6):1458-65. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5915. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
9
Probiotic cheese production using Lactobacillus casei cells immobilized on fruit pieces.使用固定在水果片上的干酪乳杆菌细胞生产益生菌奶酪。
J Dairy Sci. 2006 May;89(5):1439-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72212-3.
10
Control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh cheese using protective lactic acid bacteria.利用保护性乳酸菌控制新鲜奶酪中的李斯特菌。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Nov 17;191:53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Whey in Functional Microorganism Growth and Metabolite Generation: A Biotechnological Perspective.从生物技术角度看乳清在功能性微生物生长及代谢产物生成中的作用
Foods. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):1488. doi: 10.3390/foods14091488.
2
Antibacterial Activity, Probiotic Potential, and Biocontrol Efficacy of Two Lactic Acid Bacteria Against on Fresh Grapes.两种乳酸菌对新鲜葡萄的抗菌活性、益生菌潜力及生物防治效果
Foods. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):493. doi: 10.3390/foods14030493.
3
Effect of the Bioprotective Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains on Quality and Safety of Feta Cheese Stored under Different Conditions.

本文引用的文献

1
Antifungal Capacity of Poolish-Type Sourdough Supplemented with and Its Aqueous Extracts In Vitro and Bread.添加[具体物质]及其水提取物的波兰酵头发酵面团在体外和面包中的抗真菌能力
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 14;11(12):1813. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121813.
2
Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus, Uropathogenic Escherichia coli, and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Strains from Pasteurized Cheeses and Unpasteurized Cream Sold at Traditional Open Markets in Mexico City.从墨西哥城传统露天市场销售的巴氏杀菌奶酪和未经巴氏杀菌的奶油中分离出金黄色葡萄球菌、尿路致病性大肠杆菌和非结核分枝杆菌菌株。
J Food Prot. 2022 Dec 1;85(12):1848-1854. doi: 10.4315/JFP-22-168.
3
乳酸菌菌株的生物保护特性对在不同条件下储存的菲达奶酪质量和安全性的影响。
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 10;12(9):1870. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091870.
Hygiene and Safety of Hard Cheese Made from Raw Cows' Milk.
用生牛奶制成的硬质奶酪的卫生与安全。
Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 16;9(10):569. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100569.
4
Occurrence, Pathogenic Potential and Antimicrobial Resistance of Isolated from Raw Milk Cheese Commercialized in Banat Region, Romania.从罗马尼亚巴纳特地区商业化的生乳奶酪中分离出的[具体内容缺失]的发生情况、致病潜力及抗菌耐药性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 27;11(6):721. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060721.
5
Risk ranking of food categories associated with Salmonella enterica contamination in the central region of Mexico.墨西哥中部地区与肠炎沙门氏菌污染相关的食品类别风险排名。
Risk Anal. 2023 Feb;43(2):308-323. doi: 10.1111/risa.13907. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Characterization of lactic acid bacteria postbiotics, evaluation in-vitro antibacterial effect, microbial and chemical quality on chicken drumsticks.鸡琵琶腿中乳酸菌后生元的特性、体外抗菌效果评价、微生物和化学质量评估。
Food Microbiol. 2022 Jun;104:104001. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104001. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Prevalence of multidrug resistant Salmonella spp. in dairy products with the evaluation of the inhibitory effects of ascorbic acid, pomegranate peel extract, and D-tryptophan against Salmonella growth in cheese.奶制品中多重耐药性沙门氏菌的流行情况,评估抗坏血酸、石榴皮提取物和 D-色氨酸对奶酪中沙门氏菌生长的抑制作用。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2022 Mar 2;364:109534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109534. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
The impacts of antimicrobial and antifungal activity of cell-free supernatants from lactic acid bacteria in vitro and foods.乳酸菌无细胞上清液在体外及食品中的抗菌和抗真菌活性影响。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022 Jan;21(1):604-641. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12872. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
9
Whey Utilization: Sustainable Uses and Environmental Approach.乳清的利用:可持续用途与环境方法
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2021 Jun;59(2):147-161. doi: 10.17113/ftb.59.02.21.6968.
10
Characterization of Pediococcus acidilactici postbiotic and impact of postbiotic-fortified chitosan coating on the microbial and chemical quality of chicken breast fillets.植物乳杆菌后生元和壳聚糖后生元强化涂层对鸡胸肉片微生物和化学质量的影响。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2021 Aug 1;184:429-437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.106. Epub 2021 Jun 21.