• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将强度梯度适配于儿童和青少年基于计步的加速度计数据使用。

Adapting the Intensity Gradient for Use with Count-Based Accelerometry Data in Children and Adolescents.

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 10;24(10):3019. doi: 10.3390/s24103019.

DOI:10.3390/s24103019
PMID:38793873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11125286/
Abstract

The intensity gradient is a new cutpoint-free metric that was developed to quantify physical activity (PA) measured using accelerometers. This metric was developed for use with the ENMO (Euclidean norm minus one) metric, derived from raw acceleration data, and has not been validated for use with count-based accelerometer data. In this study, we determined whether the intensity gradient could be reproduced using count-based accelerometer data. Twenty participants (aged 7-22 years) wore a GT1M, an ActiGraph (count-based), and a GT9X, ActiGraph (raw accelerations) accelerometer during both in-lab and at-home protocols. We found strong agreement between GT1M and GT9X counts during the combined in-lab activities (mean bias = 2 counts) and between minutes per day with different intensities of activity (e.g., sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous) classified using cutpoints (mean bias < 5 min/d at all intensities). We generated bin sizes that could be used to generate IGs from the count data (mean bias = -0.15; 95% LOA [-0.65, 0.34]) compared with the original IG. Therefore, the intensity gradient could be used to analyze count data. The count-based intensity gradient metric will be valuable for re-analyzing historical datasets collected using older accelerometer models, such as the GT1M.

摘要

强度梯度是一种新的无切点度量标准,用于量化使用加速度计测量的身体活动 (PA)。该度量标准是为使用源自原始加速度数据的 ENMO(欧几里得范数减一)度量标准而开发的,尚未经过验证可用于基于计数的加速度计数据。在这项研究中,我们确定了强度梯度是否可以使用基于计数的加速度计数据重现。二十名参与者(年龄 7-22 岁)在实验室和家庭协议期间佩戴了 GT1M、ActiGraph(基于计数)和 GT9X、ActiGraph(原始加速度)加速度计。我们发现 GT1M 和 GT9X 计数在联合实验室活动中具有很强的一致性(平均偏差= 2 计数),并且使用切点分类的不同活动强度(例如久坐、轻度、中度和剧烈)的分钟数之间具有很强的一致性(在所有强度下平均偏差<5 分钟/天)。与原始 IG 相比,我们生成了可用于从计数数据生成 IG 的箱大小(平均偏差= -0.15;95%LOA[-0.65,0.34])。因此,可以使用基于计数的强度梯度度量标准来分析计数数据。基于计数的强度梯度度量标准将有助于重新分析使用较旧的加速度计模型(如 GT1M)收集的历史数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/d320b8bd636f/sensors-24-03019-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/1e59aa73d057/sensors-24-03019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/8a99c81e405f/sensors-24-03019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/d1faaf1a7e17/sensors-24-03019-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/d320b8bd636f/sensors-24-03019-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/1e59aa73d057/sensors-24-03019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/8a99c81e405f/sensors-24-03019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/d1faaf1a7e17/sensors-24-03019-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb4/11125286/d320b8bd636f/sensors-24-03019-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Adapting the Intensity Gradient for Use with Count-Based Accelerometry Data in Children and Adolescents.将强度梯度适配于儿童和青少年基于计步的加速度计数据使用。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 10;24(10):3019. doi: 10.3390/s24103019.
2
Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.从佩戴在腕部的 ActiGraph 加速度计在自由生活的成年人中确定活动强度的切点的开发。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Nov;38(22):2569-2578. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
An Activity Index for Raw Accelerometry Data and Its Comparison with Other Activity Metrics.原始加速度计数据的活动指数及其与其他活动指标的比较。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 11;11(8):e0160644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160644. eCollection 2016.
4
Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.原始加速度数据的强度阈值:欧几里得范数减一(ENMO)和平均幅度偏差(MAD)方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0164045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164045. eCollection 2016.
5
Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.在评估成年人的身体活动时,加速度计信号聚合指标在不同位置和主要手腕切割点的可比性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54267-y.
6
Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter?使用 GGIR R 包分析原始加速度计数据:加速度计品牌重要吗?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Oct;48(10):1935-41. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000978.
7
Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents.英国儿童和青少年腕戴加速度计体力活动指标的参考值。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Mar 25;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01435-z.
8
Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.两代人在成年人自由生活中使用 Hip 和 Wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X +、wGT3X-BT 和 GT9X 加速度计的可比较性。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Dec;38(24):2794-2802. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1801320. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
9
Raw and Count Data Comparability of Hip-Worn ActiGraph GT3X+ and Link Accelerometers.髋部佩戴 ActiGraph GT3X+ 和 Link 加速度计的原始和计数数据可比性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 May;50(5):1103-1112. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001534.
10
Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization.发表的用于评估体力活动的切点的可比性:对数据协调的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Apr;29(4):566-574. doi: 10.1111/sms.13356. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Enabling the ActiGraph GT9X Link's Idle Sleep Mode and Inertial Measurement Unit Settings Directly Impacts Data Acquisition.启用 ActiGraph GT9X Link 的空闲睡眠模式和惯性测量单元设置会直接影响数据采集。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;23(12):5558. doi: 10.3390/s23125558.
2
The Influence of Accelerometer Epoch Length on Associations of Physical Activity Intensity and Volume with Bone Outcomes.加速度计时间间隔对体力活动强度和量与骨结局相关性的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Mar 1;22(1):117-132. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.117. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Physical activity volume and intensity distribution in relation to bone, lean and fat mass in children.
儿童身体活动量和强度分布与骨量、瘦体重和体脂肪量的关系。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023 Mar;33(3):267-282. doi: 10.1111/sms.14255. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Physical Activity for Bone Health: How Much and/or How Hard?促进骨骼健康的身体活动:多少和/或多剧烈?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Nov;52(11):2331-2341. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002380.
5
Activity Intensity, Volume, and Norms: Utility and Interpretation of Accelerometer Metrics.活动强度、量和标准:加速度计指标的实用性和解释。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2410-2422. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002047.
6
Comparison of Two Generations of ActiGraph Accelerometers: The CARDIA Study.两代 ActiGraph 加速度计的比较:CARDIA 研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jun;50(6):1333-1340. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001568.
7
Beyond Cut Points: Accelerometer Metrics that Capture the Physical Activity Profile.超越切点:捕捉身体活动特征的加速度计指标。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jun;50(6):1323-1332. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001561.
8
Repeated Measures Correlation.重复测量相关性
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 7;8:456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456. eCollection 2017.
9
Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.原始加速度数据的强度阈值:欧几里得范数减一(ENMO)和平均幅度偏差(MAD)方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0164045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164045. eCollection 2016.
10
Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions.在自由生活条件下,Actigraph GT3X+加速度计在成年人中的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134606. eCollection 2015.