Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jun;52(7):1773-1783. doi: 10.1177/03635465241248642. Epub 2024 May 25.
The addition of an iliotibial band-based lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to reduce failure rates. However, there are concerns as to the potential overconstraint of tibiofemoral kinematics that may increase the risk of cartilage degradation. To date, no clinical study has investigated the effect of LET on patellofemoral joint articular cartilage health.
It was hypothesized that at 2 years postoperatively, (1) the addition of LET at the time of ACLR would have no effect on cartilage health on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (2) higher cartilage relaxation values would be associated with worse patient-reported and functional outcomes.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A subset of patients from the STABILITY 1 randomized controlled trial were included. All patients underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring autograft. Patients were randomized to either LET augmentation or not. Cartilage status in the patellofemoral joint between the ACLR group and ACLR+LET group was compared using 2-year postoperative quantitative MRI and the ACL osteoarthritis scores of both the surgical and the contralateral nonsurgical knees. Objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were attained.
A total of 92 patients (43 patients in the ACLR group; mean age, 18.9 ± 3.2 years; 60.5% female; and 49 patients in the ACLR+LET group; mean age, 18.7 ± 3.2 years, 63.3% female) were included. No significant differences were seen in the mean values (ms) for adjusted T1ρ/T2 relaxation times in the medial patella (47.8/42.2 vs 47.3/43.2), central patella (45.5/42.5 vs 44.1/42.7), lateral patella (48.2/43.5 vs 47.3/43.0), medial trochlea (54.7/50.9 vs 56.4/50.9), central trochlea (53.3/51.1 vs 53.1/52.0), and lateral trochlea (54.9/52.1 vs 53.9/52.6) between the ACLR and ACLR+LET groups. No difference in overall ACL osteoarthritis scores was observed ( = .99). An increase in medial patellar T2 relaxation times was associated with a decreasing International Knee Documentation Committee score ( = .046), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms subscale score ( = .01), and total KOOS ( = .01).
There was no statistical difference in patellofemoral cartilage health between knees 2 years after primary ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft with or without LET. Statistically significant correlations were found between quantitative MRI relaxation times, functional outcome scores, and PROMs; however, the correlations were weak and the clinical significance is unknown.
NCT02018354 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
在进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)时,增加基于阔筋膜张肌的外侧关节外腱固定术(LET)已被证明可以降低失败率。然而,人们担心可能会过度限制胫股关节运动学,从而增加软骨退化的风险。迄今为止,尚无临床研究调查 LET 对髌股关节关节软骨健康的影响。
假设(1)在 ACLR 后 2 年,添加 LET 不会对 MRI 上的软骨健康产生影响;(2)较高的软骨弛豫值与较差的患者报告和功能结果相关。
队列研究;证据水平,3 级。
从 STABILITY 1 随机对照试验中选择了一组患者。所有患者均接受了使用自体腘绳肌腱的 ACLR。患者被随机分配至 LET 增强或非 LET 增强组。通过术后 2 年的定量 MRI 和 ACL 骨关节炎评分(手术和对侧非手术膝关节)比较 ACLR 组和 ACLR+LET 组髌股关节的软骨状况。获得客观的功能结果和患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。
共纳入 92 例患者(ACLR 组 43 例,平均年龄 18.9 ± 3.2 岁,女性占 60.5%;ACL+LET 组 49 例,平均年龄 18.7 ± 3.2 岁,女性占 63.3%)。在调整后的 T1ρ/T2 弛豫时间的平均值(ms)方面,内侧髌骨(47.8/42.2 比 47.3/43.2)、中央髌骨(45.5/42.5 比 44.1/42.7)、外侧髌骨(48.2/43.5 比 47.3/43.0)、内侧滑车(54.7/50.9 比 56.4/50.9)、中央滑车(53.3/51.1 比 53.1/52.0)和外侧滑车(54.9/52.1 比 53.9/52.6)之间,ACLR 组和 ACLR+LET 组之间没有统计学差异(=0.99)。未观察到整体 ACL 骨关节炎评分的差异(=0.99)。内侧髌骨 T2 弛豫时间的增加与国际膝关节文献委员会评分(=0.046)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)症状子量表评分(=0.01)和总 KOOS(=0.01)的降低相关。
在使用自体腘绳肌腱进行 ACLR 后 2 年,髌股关节软骨健康在接受或不接受 LET 治疗的膝关节之间没有统计学差异。定量 MRI 弛豫时间、功能结果评分和 PROM 之间存在统计学显著相关性;然而,相关性较弱,临床意义尚不清楚。
NCT02018354(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符)。