Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du Sport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1665-1672. doi: 10.1177/0363546520914936. Epub 2020 May 5.
Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BTB) is a reliable surgical option for the control of anterior knee laxity after ACL injury. The addition of a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may improve control of rotation knee laxity and improve short-term graft survival in high-risk patients.
The aims of this study were to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes, graft survival, and risk of osteoarthritis between ACLR with and without LET.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
This study included 121 consecutive knees (120 patients) presenting to a single center with an ACL rupture between 1998 and 1999. In total, 61 knees were randomized to an isolated BTB ACLR, and 60 knees were randomized to a BTB ACLR with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis with gracilis tendon (modified Lemaire).
Eighty knees in 79 patients (66%) were available for follow-up at a postoperative mean of 19.4 years (range, 19-20.2). Of those patients, 43 had a clinical examination and completed patient-reported outcome questionnaires, and the other 37 patients were evaluated through the questionnaires alone. Standard radiographs were available for 45 patients and laximetry (TELOS) for 42 patients. Mean subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score at last follow-up was 81.8, and no differences were noted between the BTB and BTB-LET groups ( = .7). Two-thirds of patients were still participating in pivoting sports. A total of 17 knees (21%) experienced a graft failure, 5 of which (6%) underwent revision ACLR. There was no significant difference in graft failure risk between the BTB group (29%) and the BTB-LET group (13%; = .1). Lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis was significantly more frequent in the BTB-LET group (59%) as compared with the BTB group (22%; = .02). Lateral compartment osteoarthritis was correlated with partial lateral meniscectomy.
There were no significant differences in long-term patient-reported outcomes after ACLR with or without an LET. LET may increase the risk of lateral compartment osteoarthritis at long-term follow-up. There was a trend toward decreased graft failure risk with the addition of LET but this study was underpowered to assess this outcome.
关节镜下前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)结合骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)移植物是控制 ACL 损伤后前膝松弛的可靠手术选择。附加外侧关节外腱固定术(LET)可能会改善对旋转膝松弛的控制,并提高高危患者的短期移植物存活率。
本研究旨在比较 ACLR 联合和不联合 LET 的长期患者报告结局、移植物存活率和骨关节炎风险。
随机对照试验;证据水平,2 级。
本研究纳入了 1998 年至 1999 年间在一家单中心因 ACL 断裂就诊的 121 例连续膝关节(120 例患者)。共有 61 例膝关节随机分为单纯 BTB ACLR,60 例膝关节随机分为 BTB ACLR 联合外侧关节外骼胫束(改良 Lemaire)肌腱固定术。
79 例患者中的 80 例膝关节(66%)在术后平均 19.4 年(19-20.2 年)时可进行随访。其中 43 例患者接受了临床检查和患者报告结局问卷调查,其余 37 例患者仅接受了问卷调查。45 例患者获得了标准 X 线片,42 例患者获得了 TELOS 侧方松弛度检查。末次随访时,平均主观国际膝关节文献委员会评分 81.8,BTB 组和 BTB-LET 组之间无差异( =.7)。三分之二的患者仍参加旋转运动。共有 17 例膝关节(21%)发生移植物失败,其中 5 例(6%)行 ACLR 翻修。BTB 组(29%)和 BTB-LET 组(13%)之间的移植物失败风险无显著差异( =.1)。与 BTB 组(22%)相比,BTB-LET 组的外侧胫骨股骨骨关节炎更为常见(59%)( =.02)。外侧间室骨关节炎与部分外侧半月板切除术相关。
ACL 重建联合或不联合 LET 后,长期患者报告结局无显著差异。长期随访时,LET 可能会增加外侧间室骨关节炎的风险。但附加 LET 有降低移植物失败风险的趋势,但本研究在评估该结局方面的效力不足。