Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Email:
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jun;33(2):247-271. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202406_33(2).0011.
Sarcopenia has garnered extensive attention in clinical practice since its high prevalence and significant impact on clinical outcomes. Multiple organizations have published guidance documents on sarcopenia, offering evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and/or research. We aimed to appraise the methodological quality of the included documents and synthesize available recommendations for the screening, diagnosis, and intervention of sarcopenia.
We conducted a search on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, guideline database, and guideline organizations and professional societies websites for clinical practices, consensus statements and position papers in terms of sarcopenia, muscle atrophy or muscle loss published before April 17, 2023. The AGREE II instrument was used by three independent reviewers to assess the methodological quality of these documents.
Thirty-six guidance documents published between 2010 and 2023 were included. Seven documents fulfilled ≥ 50% of all the AGREE II domains. Seven underwent a Delphi process and six graded the strength of the recommendations. The process of screening (n=21), early diagnosis of sarcopenia (n=12), diagnosis of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia (n=10), and management (n=21) were increasingly recommended. SARC-F (n=14) was the most recommended screening tool, and the assessment of muscle function was considered the first step in diagnosing sarcopenia. The management strategy for both age-related and disease-related sarcopenia mainly focused on exercise and nutrition intervention.
The guidance documents have provided referential recommendations that have great guiding significance. But the inconsistency in recommendations and variation in methodological rigour suggests that high-quality evidence is lacking yet.
肌少症因其高患病率和对临床结局的重大影响,在临床实践中受到广泛关注。多个组织发布了肌少症相关指南文件,为临床实践和/或研究提供了基于证据的建议。我们旨在评估纳入文献的方法学质量,并综合现有建议,以筛查、诊断和干预肌少症。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆、中国知网、指南数据库以及临床实践、共识声明和立场文件相关的指南组织和专业协会网站,检索时间截至 2023 年 4 月 17 日,纳入肌少症、肌肉萎缩或肌肉减少相关的临床实践指南、共识声明和立场文件。由三位独立评审员使用 AGREE II 工具评估这些文件的方法学质量。
共纳入 2010 年至 2023 年期间发布的 36 份指南文件。7 份文件满足 AGREE II 所有领域的≥50%。有 7 份文件经过 Delphi 流程,6 份文件对建议的强度进行了分级。筛选(n=21)、早期肌少症诊断(n=12)、肌少症和严重肌少症诊断(n=10)和管理(n=21)的建议越来越多。SARC-F(n=14)是最推荐的筛查工具,评估肌肉功能被认为是诊断肌少症的第一步。针对与年龄相关和与疾病相关的肌少症的管理策略主要侧重于运动和营养干预。
这些指南提供了具有重要指导意义的参考建议。但建议的不一致性和方法学严谨性的变化表明,目前缺乏高质量的证据。