Rapid Innovation Unit - School of Design and Confirm Smart Manufacturing Centre, University of Limerick, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Rapid Innovation Unit - School of Design and Confirm Smart Manufacturing Centre, University of Limerick, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024 Aug;156:106585. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106585. Epub 2024 May 20.
This study aims to assess the efficacy of post-curing guidance supplied by 3D printing resin manufacturers. Current guidance applies generically to all geometries with the caveat that post-curing should be extended for 'large' or 'complex' geometries but specific guidance is not provided. Two vat-polymerisation 3D printers (Form3B, Figure 4 Standalone) were used to print test models in 6 biocompatible resins (Pro Black, Med White, Med Amber, Biomed Black, Biomed White, Biomed Amber). The test model is of a complex geometry whilst also housing ISO 527 test specimens in concentric layers. Two separate intervals of curing were applied (100%, 500% stated guidance) creating different curing treatments of the specimens throughout the model. Post processed test models were disassembled and pull testing performed on each of the specimens to assess the mechanical properties. The analysis showed that extending the curing duration had significant effects on the mechanical properties of some materials but not all. The layers of the model had a significant effect except for elongation at break for the Med Amber material. This research demonstrates that generic post-curing guidance regarding UV exposures is not sufficient to achieve homogenous material strength properties for complex geometries. Large variations in mechanical properties throughout the models suggest some material was not fully-cured. This raises a query if such materials as originally marketed as biocompatible are fully cured and therefore safe to use for medical applications involving complex geometries.
本研究旨在评估 3D 打印树脂制造商提供的后固化指导的效果。目前的指导适用于所有几何形状,但有一个警告,即对于“大”或“复杂”的几何形状,应延长后固化时间,但没有提供具体的指导。使用两台 vat 聚合 3D 打印机(Form3B,图 4 独立式)在 6 种生物相容性树脂(Pro Black、Med White、Med Amber、Biomed Black、Biomed White、Biomed Amber)中打印测试模型。测试模型的几何形状复杂,同时在同心层中还容纳了 ISO 527 测试标本。应用了两个单独的固化间隔(100%,500%为规定的指导值),在整个模型中对标本进行不同的固化处理。对后处理的测试模型进行拆卸,并对每个标本进行拉伸测试,以评估机械性能。分析表明,延长固化时间对某些材料的机械性能有显著影响,但并非所有材料都有影响。模型的层对机械性能有显著影响,但 Med Amber 材料的断裂伸长率除外。这项研究表明,对于复杂几何形状,通用的紫外线曝光后固化指导不足以实现均匀的材料强度性能。模型中存在很大的机械性能差异,这表明有些材料没有完全固化。这引发了一个疑问,如果最初作为生物相容性销售的材料没有完全固化,那么它们是否安全用于涉及复杂几何形状的医疗应用。