• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫的保留率:单中心回顾性研究。

Retention rate of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-centre, retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2024 Jul;203:107383. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107383. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107383
PMID:38795656
Abstract

The aim of this single-centre, retrospective, observational study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) by using retention rate as a surrogate measure for seizure reduction. We included all patients with DRE, treated at the adult neurology department of the University Hospitals Leuven and who started VNS therapy from January 1, 1994, until May 1, 2021, with follow-up data cutoff on January 1, 2023. Retention rate of VNS was defined as the percentage of patients who maintain VNS at established time points. We estimated cumulative retention rate and battery replacement rate and correlated these with seizure reduction, using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical analysis of potential predictors of VNS outcome (age, sex and epilepsy duration at implantation) was performed using mono- and multivariate analyses. VNS was started in 110 patients with DRE, with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years (SD 6.5). VNS was discontinued in 55 patients (50%), with ineffectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation (98%). The battery was replaced at least once in 42 patients (38%). Estimated retention rates were 70%, 52%, 45% and 33% after 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Estimated first battery replacement rates were 16%, 42% and 47% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Both estimates showed a statistically significant correlation with seizure reduction. No independent predictors of long-term outcome of VNS were found. This is the first long-term study using retention rate of VNS to assess effectiveness. VNS is a well-tolerated therapy, but retention rates decline with long follow-up.

摘要

这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究的目的是通过保留率作为衡量减少癫痫发作的替代指标,评估迷走神经刺激(VNS)在耐药性癫痫(DRE)中的长期疗效。我们纳入了所有在鲁汶大学附属医院成人神经科接受治疗的 DRE 患者,并于 1994 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 1 日开始接受 VNS 治疗,随访数据截止到 2023 年 1 月 1 日。VNS 的保留率定义为在既定时间点保留 VNS 的患者比例。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析来估计累积保留率和电池更换率,并将其与癫痫发作减少相关联。使用单变量和多变量分析来分析 VNS 结果(年龄、性别和植入时癫痫持续时间)的潜在预测因素。110 例 DRE 患者开始接受 VNS 治疗,平均随访 8.7 年(标准差 6.5 年)。55 例患者(50%)停止了 VNS 治疗,主要原因是无效(98%)。42 例患者(38%)至少更换过一次电池。分别估计 5、10、15 和 20 年后的保留率为 70%、52%、45%和 33%。估计首次更换电池的比例分别为 16%、42%和 47%,分别在 5、10 和 15 年后。这两个估计都与癫痫发作减少呈显著相关。未发现 VNS 长期疗效的独立预测因素。这是首次使用 VNS 的保留率来评估疗效的长期研究。VNS 是一种耐受良好的治疗方法,但随着随访时间的延长,保留率会下降。

相似文献

1
Retention rate of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-centre, retrospective study.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫的保留率:单中心回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Jul;203:107383. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107383. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.迷走神经刺激治疗部分性癫痫发作。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 3;2015(4):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.pub2.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation for focal seizures.迷走神经刺激治疗局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 14;7(7):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.pub3.
4
A pilot study on the programming protocol of vagus nerve stimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: High pulse amplitude or high duty cycle.耐药性癫痫患儿迷走神经刺激编程方案的初步研究:高脉冲幅度还是高占空比。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Jun;10(3):831-841. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70043. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
5
The effect of Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on seizure control, cognitive function, and quality of life in individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review article.迷走神经刺激(VNS)对耐药性癫痫患者癫痫控制、认知功能及生活质量的影响:一篇系统综述文章。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Dec;9(6):2101-2111. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13066. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
6
The Effectiveness of Cenobamate in Patients Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug Resistant Epilepsy.氯巴占在接受迷走神经刺激治疗的耐药性癫痫患者中的有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70229. doi: 10.1111/ene.70229.
7
The role of vagus nerve stimulation in genetic etiologies of drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis.迷走神经刺激在耐药性癫痫遗传病因中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 Mar 18;29(6):667-680. doi: 10.3171/2022.1.PEDS222. Print 2022 Jun 1.
8
Reduction of generalized tonic-clonic seizures following vagus nerve stimulation therapy: CORE-VNS Study 24-month follow-up.迷走神经刺激疗法后全身强直阵挛性发作的减少:CORE-VNS研究24个月随访
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul;66(7):2307-2314. doi: 10.1111/epi.18371. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
9
Safety of vagus nerve stimulation and responsive neurostimulation used in combination for multifocal and generalized onset epilepsy in pediatric patients.儿童患者多灶性和全面性癫痫发作时联合使用迷走神经刺激和反应性神经刺激的安全性。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023 Mar 17;31(6):565-573. doi: 10.3171/2023.1.PEDS22486. Print 2023 Jun 1.
10
Rates and Predictors of Seizure Freedom With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫的无癫痫发作率及预测因素
Neurosurgery. 2016 Sep;79(3):345-53. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001165.