Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.049. Epub 2024 May 24.
Interfacility transfer to higher levels of care is becoming increasingly common. This study aims to evaluate the association between transfer to higher levels of care and prolonged transfer times with outcomes of severely injured geriatric trauma patients compared to those who are managed definitively at lower-level trauma centers.
Severely injured (Injury Severity Score >15) geriatric (≥60 y) trauma patients in the 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database managing at an American College of Surgeons/State Level III trauma center or transferring to a level I or II trauma center were included. Outcome measures were 24-h and in-hospital mortality and major complications.
Forty thousand seven hundred nineteen patients were identified. Mean age was 75 ± 8 y, 54% were male, 98% had a blunt mechanism of injury, and the median Injury Severity Score was 17 [16-21]. Median transfer time was 112 [79-154] min, and the most common transport mode was ground ambulance (82.3%). Transfer to higher levels of care within 90 min was associated with lower 24-h mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.493, P < 0.001) and similar odds of in-hospital mortality as those managed at level III centers. However, every 30-min delay in transfer time beyond 90 min was progressively associated with increased odds of 24-h (aOR: 1.058, P < 0.001) and in-hospital (aOR: 1.114, P < 0.001) mortality and major complications (aOR: 1.127, P < 0.001).
Every 30-min delay in interfacility transfer time beyond 90 min is associated with 6% and 11% higher risk-adjusted odds of 24-h and in-hospital mortality, respectively. Estimated interfacility transfer time should be considered while deciding about transferring severely injured geriatric trauma patients to a higher level of care.
医疗机构间的转院治疗越来越常见。本研究旨在评估与在较低级别创伤中心接受确定性治疗的患者相比,转往较高级别医疗机构的患者,其转院时间延长与严重老年创伤患者结局的关系。
纳入 2017-2018 年美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划数据库中,在接受美国外科医师学会/州立三级创伤中心治疗或转往一级或二级创伤中心的严重(损伤严重度评分>15)老年(≥60 岁)创伤患者。结局指标为 24 小时和住院死亡率以及主要并发症。
共确定了 4719 例患者。平均年龄为 75±8 岁,54%为男性,98%有钝性损伤机制,损伤严重度评分中位数为 17[16-21]。中位转院时间为 112[79-154]min,最常见的转运方式是地面救护车(82.3%)。90min 内转往较高级别医疗机构与较低的 24 小时死亡率相关(校正优势比[aOR]:0.493,P<0.001),且住院死亡率与在三级中心接受治疗的患者相似。然而,超过 90min 的每 30min 转院时间延迟与 24 小时(aOR:1.058,P<0.001)和住院期间(aOR:1.114,P<0.001)死亡率以及主要并发症(aOR:1.127,P<0.001)的发生风险呈正相关。
超过 90min 的每 30min 转院时间延迟与 24 小时和住院死亡率的风险调整优势比分别增加 6%和 11%相关。在决定将严重老年创伤患者转往更高级别医疗机构时,应考虑预估的医疗机构间转院时间。