Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Trop Med Int Health. 2024 Jul;29(7):647-656. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14006. Epub 2024 May 25.
Mosquito nets, particularly insecticide-treated nets, are the most recommended method of malaria control in endemic countries. However, individuals do not always have access to insecticide-treated nets or use them as recommended. The current paper expands on a previous review published in 2011 which highlighted a need for more qualitative research on the reasons for mosquito net non-use. We present a systematic review of qualitative research published in the past decade to assess the growth and quality of qualitative papers about net non-use and examine and update the current understanding. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Global Health, in addition to a citation search of the initial review. Relevant papers were screened and discussed. The critical appraisal assessment tool was used to ensure quality. Thematic synthesis was used to extract, synthesise, and analyse study findings. Compared with the initial review, the results showed a 10-fold increase in qualitative research on the reasons for mosquito net non-use between 2011 and 2021. In addition, the quality of the research has improved, with more than 90% of the papers receiving high scores, using the critical appraisal assessment tool. The reported reasons for non-use were categorised into four themes: human factors, net factors, housing structure, and net access. More than two thirds of the studies (25/39) were led by authors affiliated with institutions in malaria-endemic countries. Despite the distribution of free mosquito nets in malaria-endemic countries, earlier reported challenges remain pertinent. The most common reasons for net non-use across all regions of Malaria endemic countries pertained to human- and net-related factors. The research focus should shift towards intervention studies to address these issues.
蚊帐,特别是经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐,是流行国家控制疟疾最推荐的方法。然而,个人并不总是能够获得或按照建议使用经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐。本文在 2011 年发表的一篇综述的基础上进一步扩展,该综述强调需要进行更多关于不使用蚊帐的原因的定性研究。我们对过去十年发表的定性研究进行了系统综述,以评估关于不使用蚊帐的定性论文的数量和质量,并审查和更新当前的认识。除了对初始综述进行引文搜索外,我们还在 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和全球健康数据库中进行了全面的文献搜索。对相关论文进行了筛选和讨论。使用批判性评估工具确保质量。采用主题综合法提取、综合和分析研究结果。与初始综述相比,结果显示,2011 年至 2021 年期间,关于不使用蚊帐的原因的定性研究增加了 10 倍。此外,研究质量有所提高,超过 90%的论文使用批判性评估工具获得了高分。报告的不使用原因分为四个主题:人为因素、蚊帐因素、住房结构和蚊帐获取。超过三分之二的研究(25/39)由来自疟疾流行国家机构的作者领导。尽管在疟疾流行国家免费分发了蚊帐,但早期报告的挑战仍然相关。在疟疾流行国家的所有地区,不使用蚊帐最常见的原因与人为因素和蚊帐有关。研究重点应转向干预研究,以解决这些问题。