Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC, BRAC Centre, 75 Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Tuberculosis and Malaria Control Programme, BRAC, BRAC Centre, 75 Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Malar J. 2018 Dec 6;17(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2610-0.
Malaria is still a major public health concern in Bangladesh in spite of mass distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) as a key preventive strategy. There might be a considerable gap between coverage and actual use of nets by the population in endemic areas. This study intended to assess the gap between coverage, access to and use of LLINs among the households in malaria-endemic settings in Bangladesh.
This cross-sectional study collected data from 2640 households of 13 endemic districts of Bangladesh through three-stage cluster random sampling. The gap between coverage, access and use of LLINs were calculated using the procedure established by the Roll Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group. To support the quantitative findings, qualitative data were also collected through in-depth interview, focus group discussion and key informant interview and analysed accordingly.
Of 2640 total households, 77.4% (n = 2044) possessed at least two LLINs, 56.8% (n = 1499) had insufficient access, and 18.8% (n = 495) had excess LLINs. Members of 77.9% (n = 2056) households had used LLINs the previous night and 6.0% (n = 68) did not use LLINs despite having sufficient access. LLIN use was lower in non-hill track areas, in Bengali community, in richer households and households with more than four members. Moreover, qualitative findings revealed that the major reasons behind not using LLINs were insufficient access, sleeping outside the home, migration, perceived low efficacy of LLINs, or fear of physical side effects.
Closing the access gap by providing enough nets through solid investment and well-designed behavioural change interventions are crucial for achieving and sustaining universal coverage.
尽管大规模分发长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)作为主要预防策略,但疟疾仍然是孟加拉国的一个主要公共卫生关注点。在流行地区,人口对蚊帐的覆盖率和实际使用率之间可能存在相当大的差距。本研究旨在评估孟加拉国疟疾流行地区家庭中 LLINs 的覆盖率、可及性和使用率之间的差距。
本横断面研究通过三阶段整群随机抽样从孟加拉国 13 个流行地区的 2640 户家庭中收集数据。使用由遏制疟疾监测和评估参考小组制定的程序来计算 LLINs 的覆盖率、可及性和使用率之间的差距。为了支持定量研究结果,还通过深入访谈、焦点小组讨论和关键知情人访谈收集定性数据,并进行相应分析。
在 2640 户家庭中,77.4%(n=2044)拥有至少两张 LLINs,56.8%(n=1499)存在可及性不足,18.8%(n=495)存在 LLINs 过剩。77.9%(n=2056)的家庭中有成员在前一晚使用了 LLINs,而 6.0%(n=68)尽管有足够的可及性,但没有使用 LLINs。在非丘陵地带、孟加拉社区、富裕家庭和家庭成员超过四人的家庭中,LLIN 的使用率较低。此外,定性研究结果表明,不使用 LLINs 的主要原因是可及性不足、睡在户外、迁移、认为 LLINs 效果不佳或担心身体副作用。
通过提供足够的蚊帐进行投资和精心设计的行为改变干预措施,以缩小可及性差距,对于实现和维持全民覆盖至关重要。