Suppr超能文献

[卵巢上皮癌、输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌序贯化疗疗效分析]

[Analysis of sequential chemotherapy efficacy in ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma and primary peritoneal carcinoma].

作者信息

Shen X Y, Li X P, Wang Y, Wu Y, Li Y, Yang Y C, Wei L H, Fan Y, Tang Z Q

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Department of Gynecology, Central Hospital of Zhuzhou City of Hunan Province, Zhuzhou 412001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 25;59(5):383-390. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231201-00235.

Abstract

To explore the sequential chemotherapy efficacy of different chemotherapeutic regimens in ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and pathological data of 100 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma treated at Peking University Peopel's Hospital from January 1992 to January 2019. All patients underwent staging surgery or cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on different postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, patients were divided into the sequential chemotherapy group (70 cases) and the conventional chemotherapy group (30 cases). Clinical and pathological characteristics, chemotherapy efficacy, adverse reactions, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. (1) Clinical and pathological characteristics: the age, tumor types (including ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma), pathological types, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, postoperative residual disease size, presence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and total number of chemotherapy cycles were compared between the sequential chemotherapy group and the conventional chemotherapy group. There were no statistically significant differences observed in these characteristics between the two groups (all >0.05). (2) Chemotherapy efficacy: the median sum of complete response (CR)+partial response (PR) duration in the sequential chemotherapy group was 80.0 months (range: 39 to 369 months), whereas in the conventional chemotherapy group, it was 28.0 months (range: 13 to 52 months). A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (=-7.82, <0.001). (3) Chemotherapy adverse reactions: in the sequential chemotherapy group, 55 cases (79%, 55/70) experienced bone marrow suppression and 20 cases (29%, 20/70) had neurological symptoms. In the conventional chemotherapy group, these adverse reactions occurred in 11 cases (37%, 11/30) and 2 cases (7%, 2/30), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both bone marrow suppression and neurological symptoms (all <0.05). For the other chemotherapy adverse reactions compared between the two groups, no statistically significant differences were observed (all >0.05). (4) Prognosis: during the follow-up period, the recurrence rate in the sequential chemotherapy group was 73% (51/70) and in the conventional chemotherapy group was 100% (30/30). The median sum of recurrence-free interval was 70.5 months (range: 19 to 330 months) in the sequential chemotherapy group and 15.0 months (range: 6 to 40 months) in the conventional chemotherapy group. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both recurrence rate and median recurrence-free interval (all <0.01).In the sequential chemotherapy group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 84.0 months (range: 34 to 373 months), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 87.0 months (range: 45 to 377 months). In contrast, in the conventional chemotherapy group, the median PFS time was 30.5 months (range: 14 to 60 months), and the median OS time was 37.5 months (range: 18 to 67 months). Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both PFS and OS (all <0.001). In the sequential chemotherapy group, the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates were 100% (70/70), 93% (65/70), and 21% (15/70), respectively. In contrast, in the conventional chemotherapy group, the OS rates were 50% (15/30) at 3 years, 3% (1/30) at 5 years, and 0 at 10 years, respectively. The two groups were compared respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (all <0.05). Sequential chemotherapy significantly prolongs PFS and OS in patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. The efficacy is superior to that of the conventional chemotherapy, with manageable adverse reactions. The use of sequential chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma is recommended.

摘要

探讨不同化疗方案对卵巢上皮癌、输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌的序贯化疗疗效。对1992年1月至2019年1月在北京大学人民医院接受治疗的100例铂敏感型卵巢上皮癌、输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌患者的临床和病理资料进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受分期手术或肿瘤细胞减灭术,随后进行辅助化疗。根据术后不同的辅助化疗方案,将患者分为序贯化疗组(70例)和传统化疗组(30例)。比较两组患者的临床病理特征、化疗疗效、不良反应及预后。(1)临床病理特征:比较序贯化疗组和传统化疗组患者的年龄、肿瘤类型(包括卵巢上皮癌、输卵管癌和原发性腹膜癌)、病理类型、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期、术后残留病灶大小、新辅助化疗情况及化疗周期总数。两组在这些特征方面均未观察到统计学显著差异(均>0.05)。(2)化疗疗效:序贯化疗组完全缓解(CR)+部分缓解(PR)持续时间的中位数为80.0个月(范围:39至369个月),而传统化疗组为28.0个月(范围:13至52个月)。两组间差异有统计学意义(=-7.82,<0.001)。(3)化疗不良反应:序贯化疗组中,55例(79%,55/70)出现骨髓抑制,20例(29%,20/70)出现神经症状。传统化疗组中,这些不良反应分别发生在11例(37%,11/30)和2例(7%,2/30)。两组在骨髓抑制和神经症状方面均观察到统计学显著差异(均<0.05)。两组间比较的其他化疗不良反应未观察到统计学显著差异(均>0.05)。(4)预后:随访期间,序贯化疗组的复发率为73%(51/70),传统化疗组为100%(30/30)。序贯化疗组无复发生存期的中位数为70.5个月(范围:19至330个月),传统化疗组为15.0个月(范围:6至40个月)。两组在复发率和无复发生存期中位数方面均观察到统计学显著差异(均<0.01)。序贯化疗组中,无进展生存期(PFS)的中位数为84.0个月(范围:34至373个月),总生存期(OS)的中位数为87.0个月(范围:45至377个月)。相比之下,传统化疗组中,PFS的中位数为30.5个月(范围:14至60个月),OS的中位数为37.5个月(范围:18至67个月)。两组在PFS和OS方面均观察到统计学显著差异(均<0.001)。序贯化疗组中,3年、5年和10年的OS率分别为100%(70/70)、93%(65/70)和21%(15/70)。相比之下,传统化疗组中,3年的OS率为50%(15/30),5年为3%(1/30),10年为0。两组分别比较,差异有统计学意义(均<0.05)。序贯化疗可显著延长卵巢上皮癌、输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌患者的PFS和OS。疗效优于传统化疗,且不良反应可控。推荐将序贯化疗作为卵巢上皮癌、输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌患者的一线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验