一线新辅助卡铂-紫杉醇方案治疗卵巢、输卵管或原发性腹膜癌的客观反应(ICON8):一项随机、3 期试验的事后探索性分析。

Objective responses to first-line neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (ICON8): post-hoc exploratory analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):277-288. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30591-X. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed primary surgery (DPS) is an established strategy for women with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Although this therapeutic approach has been validated in randomised, phase 3 trials, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) has not been reported. We describe RECIST and Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 responses in patients receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS in the ICON8 trial.

METHODS

ICON8 was an international, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done across 117 hospitals in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, South Korea, and Ireland. The trial included women aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, life expectancy of more than 12 weeks, and newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO; 1988) stage IC-IIA high-grade serous, clear cell, or any poorly differentiated or grade 3 histological subtype, or any FIGO (1988) stage IIB-IV epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC]5 or AUC6) and intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m by body surface area) on day 1 of every 21-day cycle (control group; group 1); intravenous carboplatin (AUC5 or AUC6) on day 1 and intravenous dose-fractionated paclitaxel (80 mg/m by body surface area) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21-day cycle (group 2); or intravenous dose-fractionated carboplatin (AUC2) and intravenous dose-fractionated paclitaxel (80 mg/m by body surface area) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21-day cycle (group 3). The maximum number of cycles of chemotherapy permitted was six. Randomisation was done with a minimisation method, and patients were stratified according to GCIG group, disease stage, and timing and outcome of cytoreductive surgery. Patients and clinicians were not masked to group allocation. The scheduling of surgery and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were determined by local multidisciplinary case review. In this post-hoc exploratory analysis of ICON8, progression-free survival was analysed using the landmark method and defined as the time interval between the date of pre-surgical planning radiological tumour assessment to the date of investigator-assessed clinical or radiological progression or death, whichever occurred first. This definition is different from the intention-to-treat primary progression-free survival analysis of ICON8, which defined progression-free survival as the time from randomisation to the date of first clinical or radiological progression or death, whichever occurred first. We also compared the extent of surgical cytoreduction with RECIST and GCIG CA125 responses. This post-hoc exploratory analysis includes only women recruited to ICON8 who were planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS and had RECIST and/or GCIG CA125-evaluable disease. ICON8 is closed for enrolment and follow-up, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01654146.

FINDINGS

Between June 6, 2011, and Nov 28, 2014, 1566 women were enrolled in ICON8, of whom 779 (50%) were planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS. Median follow-up was 29·5 months (IQR 15·6-54·3) for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS population. Of 564 women who had RECIST-evaluable disease at trial entry, 348 (62%) had a complete or partial response. Of 727 women who were evaluable by GCIG CA125 criteria at the time of diagnosis, 610 (84%) had a CA125 response. Median progression-free survival was 14·4 months (95% CI 9·2-28·0; 297 events) for patients with a RECIST complete or partial response and 13·3 months (8·1-20·1; 171 events) for those with RECIST stable disease. Median progression-free survival for women with a GCIG CA125 response was 13·8 months (95% CI 8·8-23·4; 544 events) and 9·7 months (5·8-14·5; 111 events) for those without a GCIG CA125 response. Complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in 187 (56%) of 335 women with a RECIST complete or partial response and 73 (42%) of 172 women with RECIST stable disease. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 290 (50%) of 576 women with a GCIG CA125 response and 30 (30%) of 101 women without a GCIG CA125 response.

INTERPRETATION

The RECIST-defined radiological response rate was lower than that frequently quoted to patients in the clinic. RECIST and GCIG CA125 responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer should not be used as individual predictive markers to stratify patients who are likely to benefit from DPS, but instead used in conjunction with the patient's clinical capacity to undergo cytoreductive surgery. A patient should not be denied surgery based solely on the lack of a RECIST or GCIG CA125 response.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, Health Research Board in Ireland, Irish Cancer Society, and Cancer Australia.

摘要

背景

新诊断为晚期上皮性卵巢癌的女性,采用铂类为基础的新辅助化疗后延迟进行初次手术(DPS)是一种既定的治疗策略。尽管这一治疗方法在随机、3 期临床试验中得到了验证,但尚未报道使用实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)第 1.1 版和癌症抗原 125(CA125)评估新辅助化疗的反应。我们描述了在 ICON8 试验中接受铂类为基础的新辅助化疗后行 DPS 的患者的 RECIST 和妇科肿瘤协作组(GCIG)CA125 反应。

方法

ICON8 是一项在英国、澳大利亚、新西兰、墨西哥、韩国和爱尔兰的 117 家医院进行的国际、多中心、随机、3 期临床试验。该试验纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为 0-2 分、预期寿命超过 12 周、新诊断为国际妇产科联合会(FIGO;1988 年)IC-IIA 期高级别浆液性、透明细胞或任何低分化或 3 级组织学亚型,或任何 FIGO(1988 年)IIB-IV 期卵巢、输卵管或原发性腹膜上皮性癌的女性。患者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配(1:1:1)至接受静脉注射卡铂(AUC5 或 AUC6)和静脉注射紫杉醇(175mg/m2 体表面积),每 21 天周期的第 1 天(对照组;组 1);静脉注射卡铂(AUC5 或 AUC6),第 1 天和静脉注射剂量分割紫杉醇(80mg/m2 体表面积),每 21 天周期的第 1、8 和 15 天(组 2);或静脉注射剂量分割卡铂(AUC2)和静脉注射剂量分割紫杉醇(80mg/m2 体表面积),每 21 天周期的第 1、8 和 15 天(组 3)。允许的化疗周期最大数为 6 个。随机化采用最小化方法,患者根据 GCIG 组、疾病分期以及细胞减灭术的时机和结果进行分层。患者和临床医生未对分组分配情况进行设盲。手术时间的安排和新辅助化疗的使用由当地多学科病例审查决定。在 ICON8 的这项探索性事后分析中,无进展生存期通过里程碑方法进行分析,定义为术前计划放射肿瘤评估日期至研究者评估的临床或放射学进展或死亡日期之间的时间间隔,以先发生者为准。这一定义与 ICON8 的意向治疗无进展生存期分析不同,后者将无进展生存期定义为从随机分组到首次临床或放射学进展或死亡的时间,以先发生者为准。我们还比较了 RECIST 和 GCIG CA125 反应与手术减瘤程度的关系。这项探索性事后分析仅包括计划接受新辅助化疗后行 DPS 的、具有 RECIST 和/或 GCIG CA125 可评估疾病的 ICON8 招募的女性。ICON8 已停止入组和随访,并在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01654146。

结果

2011 年 6 月 6 日至 2014 年 11 月 28 日,ICON8 共纳入 1566 名女性,其中 50%(779 名)计划接受新辅助化疗后行 DPS。新辅助化疗后行 DPS 人群的中位随访时间为 29.5 个月(IQR 15.6-54.3)。在试验入组时具有 RECIST 可评估疾病的 564 名女性中,348 名(62%)有完全或部分缓解。在诊断时可根据 GCIG CA125 标准进行评估的 727 名女性中,610 名(84%)有 CA125 反应。RECIST 完全或部分缓解患者的无进展生存期为 14.4 个月(95%CI 9.2-28.0;297 例事件),RECIST 稳定疾病患者的无进展生存期为 13.3 个月(8.1-20.1;171 例事件)。GCIG CA125 有反应的女性的无进展生存期为 13.8 个月(95%CI 8.8-23.4;544 例事件),无 GCIG CA125 有反应的女性为 9.7 个月(5.8-14.5;111 例事件)。在 335 名 RECIST 完全或部分缓解的女性中,187 名(56%)和在 172 名 RECIST 稳定疾病的女性中 73 名(42%)达到完全肿瘤减灭术(R0)。在 576 名 GCIG CA125 有反应的女性中,290 名(50%)和在 101 名 GCIG CA125 无反应的女性中 30 名(30%)达到完全肿瘤减灭术。

解释

RECIST 定义的影像学反应率低于经常在临床中向患者报告的数值。上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗的 RECIST 和 GCIG CA125 反应不应作为单独的预测标志物,用于分层可能从 DPS 中获益的患者,而应与患者接受细胞减灭术的临床能力一起使用。不应仅仅因为缺乏 RECIST 或 GCIG CA125 反应而拒绝手术。

资金

英国癌症研究中心、英国医学研究理事会、爱尔兰健康研究委员会、爱尔兰癌症协会和澳大利亚癌症协会。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索