Janowski Adam J, Berardi Giovanni, Hayashi Kazuhiro, Plumb Ashley N, Lesnak Joe B, Khataei Tahsin, Martin Ben, Benson Christopher J, Sluka Kathleen A
University of Iowa.
University of Texas at Dallas.
Res Sq. 2024 May 14:rs.3.rs-4365992. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4365992/v1.
Physical activity is commonly used for both measuring and treating dysfunction. While preclinical work has been historically biased towards males, the use of both male and female animals is gaining popularity after multiple NIH initiatives. With increasing inclusion of both sexes, it has become imperative to determine sex differences in common behavioral assays. The purpose of this study was to determine baseline sex differences in 3 activity assays: voluntary wheel running, forced treadmill running, and open field testing.
This was a secondary analysis of sex differences in healthy mice in 3 different assays: Separate mice were used for each assay. Specifically, 16 mice underwent 28 days of voluntary wheel running, 178 mice underwent forced treadmill running, and 88 mice underwent open field testing. Differences between sex across several activity parameters were examined for each assay.
In voluntary wheel running, sex differences with larger effect sizes were observed in distance run, running time, and bout duration, with smaller effect size differences in speed, and no difference in total bouts. In forced treadmill running, differences were shown in time to exhaustion, but no difference in max speed attained. In open field, there were sex differences in active time but not in distance and speed in data aggregated over 30 minutes; however, distance and speed in male mice showed a downward trajectory over the final 20 minutes of testing, whereas females maintained the same trajectory.
These data suggest that male mice demonstrate comparable activity intensity as female mice but do not match female's duration of activity, especially for volitional tasks. Researchers utilizing these assays should account for sex differences as they could potentially mask true findings in an experiment.
Physical activity is a common measure to examine function in human subjects with and without disease. Animal models often use measures of physical activity to assess function, yet most of these measures have been done in males only, making interpretation and translation to females and humans difficult. Several measures have been used to measure activity in animals, including those examining voluntary running behavior, maximum capacity, and general activity levels; sex differences between these measures are unclear. We discovered sex differences throughout each of three activity tests. In voluntary running behavior there were large differences between sexes with females running a greater distance and spending more time running. There were small differences in the maximum capacity with females running for a longer period at high intensity. General activity levels showed small differences with females being less active than males. Thus, the greatest differences were found for voluntary running and small differences were found for maximum capacity and general activity levels; differences observed were dependent on the task. Researchers utilizing these assays should account for sex differences as they could potentially mask true findings in an experiment.
身体活动常用于功能的测量和治疗。虽然临床前研究在历史上一直偏向于雄性动物,但在国立卫生研究院的多项倡议之后,雄性和雌性动物的使用越来越普遍。随着两性动物越来越多地被纳入研究,确定常见行为试验中的性别差异变得至关重要。本研究的目的是确定三种活动试验中的基线性别差异:自愿轮转跑步、强迫跑步机跑步和旷场试验。
这是对健康小鼠在三种不同试验中的性别差异进行的二次分析:每种试验使用不同的小鼠。具体而言,16只小鼠进行了28天的自愿轮转跑步,178只小鼠进行了强迫跑步机跑步,88只小鼠进行了旷场试验。对每种试验中几个活动参数的性别差异进行了检查。
在自愿轮转跑步中,在跑步距离、跑步时间和运动 bout 持续时间方面观察到性别差异,效应大小较大,在速度方面效应大小差异较小,在总 bout 数方面无差异。在强迫跑步机跑步中,在疲劳时间上存在差异,但在达到的最大速度上无差异。在旷场试验中,在30分钟汇总数据中的活动时间存在性别差异,但在距离和速度方面无差异;然而,雄性小鼠在测试的最后20分钟内距离和速度呈下降趋势,而雌性小鼠保持相同趋势。
这些数据表明,雄性小鼠的活动强度与雌性小鼠相当,但在活动持续时间上与雌性不匹配,尤其是在自愿任务方面。使用这些试验的研究人员应考虑性别差异,因为它们可能会在实验中掩盖真实的研究结果。
身体活动是检查有无疾病的人类受试者功能的常用指标。动物模型经常使用身体活动指标来评估功能,但大多数这些指标仅在雄性动物中进行,这使得对雌性动物和人类的解释及转化变得困难。已经使用了几种指标来测量动物的活动,包括那些检查自愿跑步行为、最大能力和一般活动水平的指标;这些指标之间的性别差异尚不清楚。我们在三项活动测试中的每一项中都发现了性别差异。在自愿跑步行为中,两性之间存在很大差异,雌性跑的距离更远,花费的跑步时间更多。在最大能力方面存在小差异,雌性在高强度下跑步的时间更长。一般活动水平显示出小差异,雌性比雄性活动少。因此,在自愿跑步方面发现的差异最大,在最大能力和一般活动水平方面发现的差异较小;观察到的差异取决于任务。使用这些试验的研究人员应考虑性别差异,因为它们可能会在实验中掩盖真实的研究结果。