Suppr超能文献

探讨颊侧骨开窗对上颌前牙种植体的影响:一项 1 至 6 年的回顾性研究。

Investigating the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants: A 1- to 6-year retrospective study.

出版信息

Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2024 May 27;17(2):163-172.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent implant placement in the maxillary anterior region between January 2017 and December 2021 and had received final restorations 1 to 6 years prior were screened for inclusion in the present study. Propensity score matching was used to match the two-group sample size and reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Generalised linear mixed models were employed to evaluate the correlation between buccal bone fenestration and peri-implant marginal bone loss.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients with 50 implants were included in the study, 16 of whom had buccal bone fenestration (group 1) and 26 of whom did not (group 2). No implant failures occurred, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 100.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between the pink aesthetic scores for the two groups. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.44 ± 0.46 mm for group 1 and 0.33 ± 0.32 mm for group 2 (P > 0.05). Buccal bone fenestration was not the influencing factor of marginal bone loss (P > 0.05). Marginal bone loss was greater around implants used to replace canines than those inserted to replace central incisors (P < 0.05). Far less marginal bone loss occurred around immediately loaded implants than delayed implants with cover screws (P < 0.05). When there is sufficient keratinised mucosa around the implant, marginal bone loss will decrease significantly (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, buccal bone fenestration defects around dental implants cannot influence peri-implant bone loss.

CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST STATEMENT: The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.

摘要

目的

研究颊侧骨开窗对上颌前牙种植体的影响。

材料和方法

筛选了 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在上颌前牙区接受种植体植入并在 1 至 6 年前完成最终修复的患者,纳入本研究。采用倾向评分匹配法匹配两组样本量,以减少潜在混杂因素的影响。采用广义线性混合模型评估颊侧骨开窗与种植体边缘骨丧失的相关性。

结果

共有 42 名患者(50 枚种植体)纳入本研究,其中 16 名患者有颊侧骨开窗(组 1),26 名患者无颊侧骨开窗(组 2)。所有种植体均未发生失败,累积种植体存活率为 100.0%。两组的粉色美学评分无统计学差异。组 1 的平均边缘骨丧失为 0.44±0.46mm,组 2 为 0.33±0.32mm(P>0.05)。颊侧骨开窗不是边缘骨丧失的影响因素(P>0.05)。用于替代尖牙的种植体周围边缘骨丧失大于用于替代中切牙的种植体(P<0.05)。带覆盖螺丝的延迟植入的边缘骨丧失明显多于即刻负载植入的(P<0.05)。当种植体周围有足够的角化黏膜时,边缘骨丧失会显著减少(P<0.05)。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,牙种植体颊侧骨开窗缺损不会影响种植体周围骨丧失。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验